Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 714 in Adult Patients With Celiac Disease

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 714 in Adult Patients With Celiac Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02637141
Enrollment
64
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-04-13
Completion date
2017-03-14
Last updated
2019-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Celiac Disease

Keywords

celiac, gluten, Interleukin 15 (IL-15), AMG 714, gluten challenge

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG 714 for the attenuation of the effects of gluten exposure in adult patients with celiac disease during a gluten challenge.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAMG 714

AMG 714 administered by subcutaneous injection

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Matching placebo to AMG 714 administered by subcutaneous injection

OTHERPlacebo Gluten Challenge

Gluten-free cookies (Finnish rusks)

Gluten-containing cookies (Finnish rusks), 1-2 g gluten per serving

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of celiac disease by intestinal biopsy at least 12 months prior to screening * On a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months * Negative celiac serology * Avoidance of pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

* Severe complications of celiac disease, such as refractory celiac disease * Celiac symptoms * Other concomitant autoimmune disease * Chronic, active gastrointestinal disease * Infections, concomitant diseases * Prohibited medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio (VH:CD) at Week 12Baseline and week 12Attenuation of the effects of gluten exposure was assessed by measuring the percent change from baseline in villous height to crypt depth ratio after 10 weeks of gluten challenge. Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease. Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12Baseline and week 12The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline.
Percent Change From Baseline in Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies at Week 12Baseline and week 12Levels of anti-tTG IgA antibodies in serum were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) immunoassay.
Change From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Baseline and week 12Levels of serum anti-DGP antibodies (immunoglobulin A \[IgA\] and immunoglobulin G \[IgG\]) were determined using ELISA immunoassay.
Percent Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Density at Week 12Baseline and week 12Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes is associated with celiac disease. Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.
Number of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline and week 12The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help study participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined as at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12Baseline and 12 weeksThe GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain, and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes).
Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12Baseline and 12 weeksThe CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of questions from the GSRS questionnaire, including the diarrhea, indigestion, and abdominal pain domains (a total of 10 questions), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 10 questions, and ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes).
Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline and week 12Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced on any given day, the participant was required to document this using the electronic diary.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at three sites in Finland.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met the study entry criteria were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 150 mg or 300 mg AMG 714 or placebo once every 2 weeks for a total of 6 administrations over a period of 10 weeks. Randomization was stratified by study site and sex.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AMG 714 150 mg
Participants received 150 mg AMG 714 via subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses over 10 weeks from day 0. Participants received gluten-free cookies twice a day for the first 2 weeks and gluten-containing cookies twice a day from weeks 2 to 12 (gluten-challenge).
22
AMG 714 300 mg
Participants received 300 mg AMG 714 via subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses over 10 weeks from day 0. Participants received gluten-free cookies twice a day for the first 2 weeks and gluten-containing cookies twice a day from weeks 2 to 12 (gluten-challenge).
22
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses over 10 weeks from day 0. Participants received gluten-free cookies twice a day for the first 2 weeks and gluten-containing cookies twice a day from weeks 2 to 12 (gluten-challenge).
20
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAMG 714 150 mgAMG 714 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Age, Customized
18 - 64 years
17 Participants20 Participants12 Participants49 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
5 Participants2 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants22 Participants20 Participants63 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
22 Participants22 Participants20 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants17 Participants14 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Small Intestinal Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio2.12 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.251
2.19 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.343
2.19 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.426
2.17 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.341

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 210 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 2220 / 2119 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio (VH:CD) at Week 12

Attenuation of the effects of gluten exposure was assessed by measuring the percent change from baseline in villous height to crypt depth ratio after 10 weeks of gluten challenge. Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease. Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol 1 (PP1) population included randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were histologically evaluable (provided a post-treatment biopsy sample) and received gluten challenge for at least 1 week.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio (VH:CD) at Week 12-62.66 percent changeStandard Error 5.39
AMG 714 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio (VH:CD) at Week 12-53.78 percent changeStandard Error 4.83
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth Ratio (VH:CD) at Week 12-60.17 percent changeStandard Error 5.22
p-value: 0.727195% CI: [-16.82, 11.83]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.343895% CI: [-7.07, 19.85]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12

Levels of serum anti-DGP antibodies (immunoglobulin A \[IgA\] and immunoglobulin G \[IgG\]) were determined using ELISA immunoassay.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol 1 population with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin A43.19 kU/LStandard Error 12.85
AMG 714 150 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin G28.29 kU/LStandard Error 21.45
AMG 714 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin A18.47 kU/LStandard Error 10.7
AMG 714 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin G17.98 kU/LStandard Error 14.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin A25.38 kU/LStandard Error 11.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anti-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) Antibodies at Week 12Immunoglobulin G15.12 kU/LStandard Error 16.02
Comparison: Analysis of Change From Baseline in Anti-DGP-IgAp-value: 0.303495% CI: [-16.68, 52.29]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Comparison: Analysis of Change From Baseline in Anti-DGP-IgAp-value: 0.656995% CI: [-38.11, 24.28]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Comparison: Analysis of Change From Baseline in Anti-DGP-IgGp-value: 0.625495% CI: [-40.86, 67.2]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Comparison: Analysis of Change From Baseline in Anti-DGP IgGp-value: 0.895595% CI: [-40.84, 46.57]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12

The CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of questions from the GSRS questionnaire, including the diarrhea, indigestion, and abdominal pain domains (a total of 10 questions), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 10 questions, and ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes).

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Per protocol 1 population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgChange From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 120.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
AMG 714 300 mgChange From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 121.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 123.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
p-value: 0.190895% CI: [-6.89, 1.3]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.408895% CI: [-5.53, 2.25]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Number of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12

The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help study participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined as at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol 1 population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMG 714 150 mgNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline4 Participants
AMG 714 150 mgNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Week 121 Participants
AMG 714 300 mgNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline9 Participants
AMG 714 300 mgNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Week 125 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Diarrhoea at Baseline and Week 12Week 126 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12

The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol 1 (PP1) population included randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were histologically evaluable (provided a post-treatment biopsy sample) and received gluten challenge for at least 1 week.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMG 714 150 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 120 Participants
AMG 714 300 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 120 Participants
Secondary

Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12

Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced on any given day, the participant was required to document this using the electronic diary.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol 1 population with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline8.9 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 3.66
AMG 714 150 mgNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Week 129.3 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 2.58
AMG 714 300 mgNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline10.2 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 3.96
AMG 714 300 mgNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Week 1211.5 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 5.25
PlaceboNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline9.6 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 2.92
PlaceboNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Week 1211.6 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 3.99
Comparison: Analysis of Total Weekly Bowel Movements at Week 12p-value: 0.16195% CI: [0.63, 1.08]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
p-value: 0.78195% CI: [0.81, 1.32]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies at Week 12

Levels of anti-tTG IgA antibodies in serum were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) immunoassay.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol 1 population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies at Week 125019.77 percent changeStandard Error 1482.59
AMG 714 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies at Week 121562.42 percent changeStandard Error 784.83
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Antibodies at Week 12617.53 percent changeStandard Error 866.44
p-value: 0.01495% CI: [936.39, 7868.1]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.422895% CI: [-1410.65, 3300.44]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Density at Week 12

Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes is associated with celiac disease. Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol 1 (PP1) population included randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were histologically evaluable (provided a post-treatment biopsy sample) and received gluten challenge for at least 1 week.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Density at Week 1295.14 percent changeStandard Error 15.06
AMG 714 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Density at Week 1268.22 percent changeStandard Error 13.64
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Density at Week 12109.46 percent changeStandard Error 14.65
p-value: 0.474695% CI: [-54.39, 25.74]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.034395% CI: [-79.28, -3.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12

The GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain, and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes).

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Per protocol 1 population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714 150 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 124.14 percent changeStandard Error 9.01
AMG 714 300 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 1214.96 percent changeStandard Error 8.17
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 1217.58 percent changeStandard Error 8.93
p-value: 0.276195% CI: [-37.66, 10.77]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.822195% CI: [-25.51, 20.27]Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measurement

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026