Skip to content

A Comparison of Bimatoprost SR to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

A Comparison of Bimatoprost SR to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02636946
Enrollment
144
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-02-24
Completion date
2021-01-26
Last updated
2022-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-Angle Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect and safety of Bimatoprost SR compared with selective laser trabeculoplasty in participants with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are not adequately managed with topical IOP-lowering medication for reasons other than medication efficacy (e.g., due to intolerance or nonadherence).

Interventions

Up to three Bimatoprost SR 15 micrograms (μg) administrations at Day 4, Weeks 16 and 32 (Stage 1) or two Bimatoprost SR 15 μg administrations at Day 4 and Week 16 (Stage 2).

Up to three Sham Bimatoprost SR administrations at Day 4, Weeks 16 and 32 (Stage 1) or two Sham Bimatoprost SR administrations at Day 4 and Week 16 (Stage 2).

PROCEDURESelective Laser Trabeculoplasty

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty administered on Day 1.

Sham Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty administered on Day 1.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Diagnosis of either Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in each eye that require IOP lowering treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Eye surgery (including cataract surgery) and or eye laser surgery within the past 6 months. * Enrollment in other studies using Bimatoprost SR.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at BaselineBaseline (prior to treatment)IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0.
Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 4IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analyses.
Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 12IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A MMRM was used for analyses.
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 24Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 24IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A MMRM was used for analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Initial Use of Nonstudy IOP-lowering Treatment as Determined by the InvestigatorFirst treatment to end of study (up to 525 days)Median time in days from first treatment to the initial use of non-study IOP-lowering treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPBaseline (prior to treatment) to Cycle 1: Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 31, 36, 40, 44, 47, 52; Cycle 2:Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 31, 36; Cycle 3: Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 15, 20IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. The participants who did not continue in the subsequent cycle were followed up to Week 52 in Cycle 1, Week 36 in Cycle 2, and Week 20 in Cycle 3.
Change From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Baseline (prior to treatment) to Weeks 8, 15 and 20IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

Countries

Australia, Denmark, France, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 144 participants were randomized with 72 participants in each treatment group. Out of them 142 participants were treated. The primary eye was defined as the eye with the higher intraocular pressure (IOP) at Baseline. If both the eyes were the same, the right eye was used as the primary eye. The contralateral eye is the other eye.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SLT (Primary Eye) / Bim SR 15 µg (Contralateral Eye)
Primary Eye: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) administered on Day 1 followed by up to three Sham Bimatoprost sustained release (Bim SR) administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1), Weeks 16 (Cycle 2) and 32 (Cycle 3) or two Sham Bimatoprost SR administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1) and Week 16 (Cycle 2) for participants who were enrolled under Protocol Amendment 2 or later. Contralateral (Other) Eye: Sham SLT administered on Day 1 followed by up to three Bimatoprost SR 15 μg administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1), Weeks 16 (Cycle 2) and 32 (Cycle 3) or two Bimatoprost SR 15 μg administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1) and Week 16 (Cycle 2) for participants enrolled under Protocol Amendment 2 or later.
72
Bim SR 15 µg (Primary Eye) / SLT (Contralateral Eye)
Primary Eye: Sham SLT administered on Day 1 followed by up to three Bimatoprost SR 15 μg administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1), Weeks 16 (Cycle 2) and 32 (Cycle 3) or two Bimatoprost SR 15 μg administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1) and Week 16 (Cycle 2) for participants who were enrolled under Protocol Amendment 2 or later. Contralateral (Other) Eye: SLT administered on Day 1 followed by up to three Sham Bimatoprost SR administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1), Weeks 16 (Cycle 2) and 32 (Cycle 3) or two Sham Bimatoprost SR administrations at Day 4 (Cycle 1) and Week 16 (Cycle 2) for participants who were enrolled under Protocol Amendment 2 or later.
72
Total144

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Cycle 1 (Day 1 to Week 15)Lost to Follow-up10
Cycle 1 (Day 1 to Week 15)Protocol Violation01
Cycle 1 (Day 1 to Week 15)Randomized but not Treated02
Cycle 1 (Day 1 to Week 15)Reason not Specified01
Cycle 1 (Day 1 to Week 15)Withdrawal of Consent01
Cycle 2 (Week 16 to Week 31)Adverse Event21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSLT (Primary Eye) / Bim SR 15 µg (Contralateral Eye)Bim SR 15 µg (Primary Eye) / SLT (Contralateral Eye)Total
Age, Continuous57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
61 Participants64 Participants125 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
53 Participants59 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants39 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants33 Participants77 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 720 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 7244 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 726 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 24

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A MMRM was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 24

Population: mITT Population was defined based in the ITT population but excluded participants who did not receive the second implant after implementation of Amendment 3. Overall number analyzed are number of participants and eyes with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 24-6.34 mmHgStandard Error 0.29
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 24-6.59 mmHgStandard Error 0.29
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Week 24: The null hypothesis was that bimatoprost SR 15 μg was to be declared non-inferior to SLT if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was ≤ 1.5 mmHg at all scheduled visits (Weeks 4, 12, and 24).p-value: 0.392895% CI: [-0.81, 0.32]MMRM
Primary

Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A MMRM was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 12

Population: mITT Population was defined based in the ITT population but excluded participants who did not receive the second implant after implementation of Amendment 3. Overall number analyzed are number of participants and eyes with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in IOP at Week 12-6.28 mmHgStandard Error 0.29
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in IOP at Week 12-6.81 mmHgStandard Error 0.29
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Week 12: The null hypothesis was that bimatoprost SR 15 μg was to be declared non-inferior to SLT if the upper limit of the 95% CI was ≤ 1.5 mmHg at all scheduled visits (Weeks 4, 12, and 24).p-value: 0.073595% CI: [-1.09, 0.05]MMRM
Primary

Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. A mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to Week 4

Population: mITT Population was defined based in the ITT population but excluded participants who did not receive the second implant after implementation of Amendment 3. Overall number analyzed are number of participants and eyes with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in IOP at Week 4-6.28 mmHgStandard Error 0.3
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in IOP at Week 4-6.98 mmHgStandard Error 0.29
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Week 4: The null hypothesis was that bimatoprost SR 15 μg was to be declared non-inferior to SLT if the upper limit of the 95% CI was ≤ 1.5 mmHg at all scheduled visits (Weeks 4, 12, and 24).p-value: 0.016695% CI: [-1.28, -0.13]MMRM
Primary

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Baseline

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was defined based in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population but excluded participants who did not receive the second implant after implementation of Amendment 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyIntraocular Pressure (IOP) at Baseline24.45 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 2.75
Bim SR 15 μgIntraocular Pressure (IOP) at Baseline24.38 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 2.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to Weeks 8, 15 and 20

Population: ITT Population was defined as all randomized participants. Number analyzed is the number of participants and eyes analyzed at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 8-6.65 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.1
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 15-6.14 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.47
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 20-5.06 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.33
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 8-7.09 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.93
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 15-5.36 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.73
Bim SR 15 μgChange From Baseline in IOP at Weeks 8, 15, and 20Change from Baseline at Week 20-4.29 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.93
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOP

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Measurements were taken at Hour 0. The participants who did not continue in the subsequent cycle were followed up to Week 52 in Cycle 1, Week 36 in Cycle 2, and Week 20 in Cycle 3.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to Cycle 1: Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 31, 36, 40, 44, 47, 52; Cycle 2:Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 31, 36; Cycle 3: Day 2, Weeks 4, 8, 15, 20

Population: ITT Population was defined as all randomized participants. Number analyzed is number of participants and eyes analyzed at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Day 270.2 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2863.6 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 468.8 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Day 260.6 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 868.5 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 31100.0 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 1272.0 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 1567.2 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 1569.4 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 3672.7 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2076.9 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 872.9 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2464.4 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4054.5 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2876.5 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2050.0 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 3176.7 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4481.8 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 3679.1 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Day 275.8 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 470.2 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 474.2 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4772.7 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 875.0 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2481.8 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 1570.0 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 5281.8 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 2069.7 percentage of participants
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 1267.9 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 1265.3 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Day 292.7 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 478.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 880.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 1275.2 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 1564.2 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2040.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2445.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 2845.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 3140.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 3672.7 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4054.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4445.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 4754.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 1 Week 5281.8 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Day 289.5 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 475.2 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 871.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 3667.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 1564.3 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2064.8 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2471.3 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 2874.1 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 2 Week 3174.4 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Day 290.9 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 471.0 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 859.4 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 1543.3 percentage of participants
Bim SR 15 μgPercentage of Participants With Eyes Achieving a ≥ 20% Reduction in IOPCycle 3 Week 2039.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Initial Use of Nonstudy IOP-lowering Treatment as Determined by the Investigator

Median time in days from first treatment to the initial use of non-study IOP-lowering treatment.

Time frame: First treatment to end of study (up to 525 days)

Population: ITT Population was defined as all randomized participants. Overall number analyzed are number of participants and eyes with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Selective Laser TrabeculoplastyTime to Initial Use of Nonstudy IOP-lowering Treatment as Determined by the Investigator410 days
Bim SR 15 μgTime to Initial Use of Nonstudy IOP-lowering Treatment as Determined by the Investigator446 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026