Skip to content

Autologous Cartilage Implantation vs Arthroscopic Debridement

Focal Cartilage Defects in the Knee -A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Arthroscopic Debridement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02636881
Acronym
ACI
Enrollment
28
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Injury, Knee Injury

Brief summary

82 patients aged 18-49 years with an isolated focal cartilage defect in the knee will be randomized to either receive autologous cartilage implantation or arthroscopic debridement. Both groups will then undergo a systematic physiotherapy training regime for 6-9 months. The Groups will then be compared for results, after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, by using validated patient reported outcome scores (Lysholm, KOOS, Tegner) and EQ5D (European Quality of Life 5 dimensions) as well as clinical examination and radiological findings at 2 years (MRI).

Detailed description

Details Focal cartilage defects in the knee - A randomized controlled trial comparing Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with arthroscopic debridement Clinical Compare the effect of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) with arthroscopic debridement (AD) in patients with symptomatic full thickness knee cartilage injuries larger than 2cm2. Focal cartilage injuries in the knee might have devastating effect both in the short term and in the long term. Various surgical treatment options are available; with ACI established as a recognized treatment method for larger lesions. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews have required well-designed, long-term, multicenter studies to evaluate clinical outcomes of ACI with the use of a no treatment group as a control group. H0: There is no difference in KOOS QoL after ACI or AD from baseline to 24 months after surgery. H1: There is a difference in KOOS QoL after ACI or AD from baseline to 24 months after surgery. Questionnaires: KOOS, Tegner score, Lysholm score, EQ-5D, VAS (Visual analogue scale). Physical examination: range of motion and hop test. Radiology: x-ray and MRI of the knee. Primary aim: KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscore. Prospective, single-blinded parallel-group bicenter study with 2 treatment arms. Approx. 36 months inclusion and 24 months follow up. In total 5 years. 24 months. All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. 2 Norwegian hospitals: Akershus University Hospital and Oslo University Hospital - Ullevål. 82 patients Inclusion: age 18-50 years old, single symptomatic cartilage defect on femoral condyle or trochlea, defect size larger than 2 cm2, defect ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) grade 3-4, ligamentous stable knee, range of motion 5-105°, Lysholm score \< 75 and informed consent. Exclusion: Osteoarthritis, rheumatoid or other systemic arthritis, malalignment \> 5° measured on x-rays, BMI \> 30, comorbidities that may influence surgery or rehabilitation, pregnancy, inability to complete questionnaires or rehabilitation, serious alcohol or drug abuse, previous cartilage surgery to the chondral defect except OCD (osteochondritis dissecans)surgery. 2 treatment groups with 41 patients in each group. 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 4 weeks), 12 months (± 6 weeks) and 24 months (± 8 weeks). All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. If any unforeseen complication outside normal clinical practice occurs, the sponsor representative will be contacted as soon as possible with a parallel message to the local coordinators at the involved hospitals. During each follow up, there will be a case report form (CRF) regarding complications and safety. A 5 mL venous blood sample will be drawn on the day of operation. The blood sample will be centrifuged before serum is pipetted in a sterile tube. The serum will be analyzed at Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet on the cartilage biomarker microRNA-140 (miR-140). During the open chondrocyte implantation the excess cartilage debrided from the rim of the lesion will be sent for similar microRNA-140 (miR-140) analysis. (applicable for the 41 patients in the ACI arm only) If normal distribution, aims will be analyzed using linear mixed models (LMM), and the primary aim will be performed as a post hoc test for the LMM, similar to performing a two-sample t-test. If no normal distribution, analysis will be performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Detecting a difference of 10 in primary aim with 80% power using a standard deviation of 15. A p \< 0,05 is statistically significant. This gives 37 patients in each group, adding 10% drop out meaning 41 patients in each group and 82 in total. No interim analysis will be done. Monitor at Akershus University Hospital. Inclusion of 82 patients. The end of this study is 24 months after the last included patient. Inability to include 82 patients in 3 years. May prolong the inclusion period, or add other including hospitals in the study.

Interventions

Implantation of the patients own cartilage cells in a chondral defect of the knee

Arthroscopic diagnosis and debridement of the lesion, without cartilage therapy. Removal of lose bodies etc.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Single symptomatic lesion of the trochlea, medial or lateral femoral condyle of the knee larger than 2 cm2. * Cartilage lesion ICRS grade 3 or 4. * More than 50 % of the menisci intact. * Ligamentous stable knee * Lysholm Score \< 75 * Acceptable range of motion (5-105 degrees)

Exclusion criteria

* Osteoarthritis * Malalignment \> 5 degrees measured on HKA (hip-knee-ankle) radiographs * Systemic arthritis * Previous cartilage surgery * Obesity BMI \> 30 * Serious drig or alcohol abuse * Inability to answer questionnaires or partake in rehabilitation * Comorbidity that may influence surgery or rehabilitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Lifeup to 24 monthsThe KOOS is a validated patient oriented outcome measure validated to use in cartilage Research. It assesses five domains, and the Fifth domain (knee related quality of life) will be the primary endpoint in this study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tegner Scorepreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.A validated knee-score to assess the Level of physical activity
Lysholm Knee Scorepreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.A condition specific knee score that assesses 8 domains: limp, locking, swelling, pain, stair climbing, use of support, instability and squatting
EQ5Dpreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.A generic measure of health status that produces a simple descriptive profile of Health status used in clinical evaluation of Health care.
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Other domainspreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.The other four domains of the KOOS score (pain, symptoms, Activity of daily living, sport and recreational function) will act as secondary endpoints
Range of motionpreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.Clinical evaluation of the joint range of motion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging24 monthsA radiographic evaluation of the cartilage injury at 2 years
A Hop test24 monthsClinical evaluation of the knees agility, validated in knee sport medicine Research.
Visual Analogue Scalepreop, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.VAS scale for pain from 0 to 10

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026