Skip to content

Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Injectable Collagen Scaffold Transplantation for Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

The Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hUC-MSCs) With Injectable Collagen Scaffold Transplantation for Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02635464
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-12-18
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2020-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of allogeneic human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) with injectable collagen scaffold transplanted into patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALhUC-MSCs+Injectable collagen scaffold+CABG

Patients underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG) with 10\^8 allogeneic human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) in collagen scaffold injecting in the infarct region.

BIOLOGICALhUC-MSCs+CABG

Patients underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG) with 10\^8 allogeneic human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) injecting in the infarct region.

PROCEDURECABG

Patients underwent CABG alone.

Sponsors

The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, 35-65 years old. 2. Chronic coronary artery disease with coronary Stenosis detectable by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ineligibility for percutaneous revascularization, as assessed by coronary arteriography. Ineligibility for percutaneous revascularization procedures was determined by 2 expert committees: a surgical committee comprising 2 cardiovascular surgeons and a noninvasive cardiologist, and an interventional committee comprising 2 interventional cardiologists and 1 noninvasive cardiologist. 3. MRI confirmed that chronic coronary artery disease and ischemic regions. 4. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤40%. 5. NYHA Class II-IV. 6. No organ dysfunction for lung, liver and kidney. 7. Patients are able and willing to observe therapeutic effect and adverse events. 8. Signed informed consent. 9. Negative serum pregnancy test. 10. No coagulation dysfunction. 11. Glycated hemoglobin ≤6.5.

Exclusion criteria

1. Lactating or pregnant woman. 2. Ineligibility for CABG. 3. Unexplainable baseline laboratory abnormalities. 4. Sensitivity to any of the study medications. 5. Acute myocardial infarction within 1 months of enrollment in the study. 6. Patients suffering cardiovascular disease, such as aortic disease, malignant arrhythmias, congenital heart disease, intracardiac mass, moderate or severe valvular stenosis or regurgitation. 7. History of life threatening allergic or immune-mediated reaction. 8. Systemic infection or severe local infection. 9. Shock or MODS or patients cannot cooperate with doctors. 10. Severe heart, lung, liver or renal dysfunction. 11. Taking medicine that might have effect on outcomes assess. 12. Suffering HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C. 13. Participation in any clinical trial in recent three months. 14. History of mental illness or suicide risk. 15. High expectation or unrealistic demands. 16. Recently suffered a lot of radiation exposure. 17. Previous or current history of neoplasia or other comorbidity that could impact the patient's short-term survival. 18. Patients with serious complications of coronary artery disease (e.g., perforation of interventricular septum and ventricular aneurysm and mitral regurgitation due to papillary muscle dysfunction). 19. Abnormal coagulation function. 20. Patients with hemodynamic instability which may lead to serious complications. 21. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would place the patient at under risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse eventsup to 24 months after surgeryAdverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) and laboratory values were measured.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial blood flow1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsChange in myocardial blood flow evaluated by Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsChange in LVEF as measured by ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) and Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Infarct size1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsChange in infarct size evaluated by Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsChange in clinical symptoms evaluated by NYHA.
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Grading Scale1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsChange in clinical symptoms evaluated by CCS.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026