Type II Refractory Celiac Disease (RCD-II), In-situ Small Bowel T-cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
Protocol CELIM-RCD-002 is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG 714 for the treatment of adult patients with type II refractory celiac disease (RCD-II), an in-situ small bowel T-cell lymphoma.
Interventions
Administered via a 120-minute IV infusion for a total of 7 times over 10 weeks.
Administered via a 120-minute IV infusion for a total of 7 times over 10 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of refractory celiac disease Type II (RCD-II) * Greater than 20% aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) as assessed by flow cytometry * On a gluten-free diet for at least 6 months * Avoid pregnancy
Exclusion criteria
* Enteropathy-Associated T cell Lymphoma (EATL) * Infections * Immune suppression * Clinically significant co-morbidities
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes | Baseline and week 12 | The primary endpoint in this study was the change form baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with respect to total IELs, as assessed by flow cytometry (Immunological Response 1). Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. In refractory coeliac disease type 2, aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes make up 20% or more of total intraepithelial lymphocytes. Aberrant IELs were defined by flow cytometry as surface cluster of differentiation (CD)3-negative, intracellular CD3-positive IELs (sCD3-, icCD3+). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio | Baseline and week 12 | Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease and increases in the VH:CD ratio indicate an improvement in the histology of intestinal mucosa (Histological Response). Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist. |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist. The total IEL count is the density of IELs vs intestinal epithelial cells measured by immunohistochemistry. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells | Baseline and week 12 | Percent change from baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal IELs with respect to intestinal epithelial cells (Immunological Response 2) is a composite endpoint calculated by multiplying the percent of aberrant IEL versus total IELs (per flow cytometry) by the percent of total IEL versus intestinal epithelial cells as assessed by immunohistochemistry. |
| Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes). |
| Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of 10 questions from the GSRS questionnaire (questions 1, 4-9, 11, 12 and 14), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes). |
| Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced by the participant on any given day, the participant was required to document this in the diary. |
Countries
Finland, France, Netherlands, Spain, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted at 6 sites in France, Netherlands, Finland, Spain, and the United States. Participants with previously confirmed diagnosis of refractory coeliac disease (RCD) type 2 were enrolled from April 13, 2016 to January 19, 2017.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 8 mg/kg AMG 714 or placebo. Randomization and initial dosing of the first 10 participants were staggered to allow observation for any possible unanticipated side effects.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| AMG 714 Participants were administered 8 mg/kg AMG 714 via intravenous infusion on day 0, day 7 and every 2 weeks thereafter through week 10. | 19 |
| Placebo Participants were administered placebo via intravenous infusion on day 0, day 7 and every 2 weeks thereafter through week 10. | 9 |
| Total | 28 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | AMG 714 | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 68.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 64.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 |
| Age, Customized 18 - 64 years | 12 Participants | 2 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Age, Customized 65 - 84 years | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 19 Participants | 7 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes (IELs) Versus Total IELs | 62.86 percentage of aberrant IELs STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.889 | 57.60 percentage of aberrant IELs STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.199 | 60.94 percentage of aberrant IELs STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.55 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 19 Participants | 9 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 6 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 3 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 19 | 0 / 9 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 19 | 8 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 19 | 1 / 9 |
Outcome results
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes
The primary endpoint in this study was the change form baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with respect to total IELs, as assessed by flow cytometry (Immunological Response 1). Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. In refractory coeliac disease type 2, aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes make up 20% or more of total intraepithelial lymphocytes. Aberrant IELs were defined by flow cytometry as surface cluster of differentiation (CD)3-negative, intracellular CD3-positive IELs (sCD3-, icCD3+).
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: The per protocol (PP) population included participants who received study drug and provided evaluable data for efficacy analysis, excluded non-evaluable participants and those with major protocol deviations. Participants with atypical RCD-II were also excluded from analyses of Immunological Response 1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes | 2.45 percent change | Standard Error 8.83 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes | 7.30 percent change | Standard Error 11.7 |
Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12
The CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of 10 questions from the GSRS questionnaire (questions 1, 4-9, 11, 12 and 14), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes).
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12 | -0.14 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12 | 0.17 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.24 |
Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12
The GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes).
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12 | -0.14 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12 | 0.20 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.19 |
Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12
Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced by the participant on any given day, the participant was required to document this in the diary.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: The intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of the study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline | 10.3 bowel movements per week | Standard Deviation 5.21 |
| AMG 714 | Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12 | 11.3 bowel movements per week | Standard Deviation 5.72 |
| Placebo | Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12 | 8.3 bowel movements per week | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| Placebo | Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline | 7.4 bowel movements per week | Standard Deviation 4.03 |
Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12
The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline | 52.6 percentage of participants |
| AMG 714 | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12 | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12
The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Per protocol population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12 | 35.3 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12 | 33.3 percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells
Percent change from baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal IELs with respect to intestinal epithelial cells (Immunological Response 2) is a composite endpoint calculated by multiplying the percent of aberrant IEL versus total IELs (per flow cytometry) by the percent of total IEL versus intestinal epithelial cells as assessed by immunohistochemistry.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: The per protocol (PP) population included participants who received study drug and provided evaluable data for efficacy analysis, excluded non-evaluable participants and those with major protocol deviations. Participants with atypical RCD-II were also excluded from analyses of Immunological Response 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells | 11.66 percent change | Standard Error 15.79 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells | 49.88 percent change | Standard Error 21.33 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12
Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist. The total IEL count is the density of IELs vs intestinal epithelial cells measured by immunohistochemistry.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: The per protocol population
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12 | 26.84 percent change | Standard Error 17.9 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12 | 39.57 percent change | Standard Error 24.95 |
Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio
Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease and increases in the VH:CD ratio indicate an improvement in the histology of intestinal mucosa (Histological Response). Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Per protocol population
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMG 714 | Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio | 26.44 percent change | Standard Error 14.06 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio | 15.77 percent change | Standard Error 19.36 |