Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 714 in Adult Patients With Type II Refractory Celiac Disease

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 714 in Adult Patients With Type II Refractory Celiac Disease, an In Situ Small Bowel T Cell Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02633020
Enrollment
28
Registered
2015-12-17
Start date
2016-04-13
Completion date
2017-05-02
Last updated
2019-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type II Refractory Celiac Disease (RCD-II), In-situ Small Bowel T-cell Lymphoma

Brief summary

Protocol CELIM-RCD-002 is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMG 714 for the treatment of adult patients with type II refractory celiac disease (RCD-II), an in-situ small bowel T-cell lymphoma.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAMG 714

Administered via a 120-minute IV infusion for a total of 7 times over 10 weeks.

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Administered via a 120-minute IV infusion for a total of 7 times over 10 weeks.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of refractory celiac disease Type II (RCD-II) * Greater than 20% aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) as assessed by flow cytometry * On a gluten-free diet for at least 6 months * Avoid pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

* Enteropathy-Associated T cell Lymphoma (EATL) * Infections * Immune suppression * Clinically significant co-morbidities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial LymphocytesBaseline and week 12The primary endpoint in this study was the change form baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with respect to total IELs, as assessed by flow cytometry (Immunological Response 1). Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. In refractory coeliac disease type 2, aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes make up 20% or more of total intraepithelial lymphocytes. Aberrant IELs were defined by flow cytometry as surface cluster of differentiation (CD)3-negative, intracellular CD3-positive IELs (sCD3-, icCD3+).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) RatioBaseline and week 12Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease and increases in the VH:CD ratio indicate an improvement in the histology of intestinal mucosa (Histological Response). Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12Baseline and week 12The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12Baseline and week 12Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist. The total IEL count is the density of IELs vs intestinal epithelial cells measured by immunohistochemistry.
Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial CellsBaseline and week 12Percent change from baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal IELs with respect to intestinal epithelial cells (Immunological Response 2) is a composite endpoint calculated by multiplying the percent of aberrant IEL versus total IELs (per flow cytometry) by the percent of total IEL versus intestinal epithelial cells as assessed by immunohistochemistry.
Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline and week 12The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week.
Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12Baseline and week 12The GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes).
Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12Baseline and week 12The CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of 10 questions from the GSRS questionnaire (questions 1, 4-9, 11, 12 and 14), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes).
Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline and week 12Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced by the participant on any given day, the participant was required to document this in the diary.

Countries

Finland, France, Netherlands, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 6 sites in France, Netherlands, Finland, Spain, and the United States. Participants with previously confirmed diagnosis of refractory coeliac disease (RCD) type 2 were enrolled from April 13, 2016 to January 19, 2017.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 8 mg/kg AMG 714 or placebo. Randomization and initial dosing of the first 10 participants were staggered to allow observation for any possible unanticipated side effects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AMG 714
Participants were administered 8 mg/kg AMG 714 via intravenous infusion on day 0, day 7 and every 2 weeks thereafter through week 10.
19
Placebo
Participants were administered placebo via intravenous infusion on day 0, day 7 and every 2 weeks thereafter through week 10.
9
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAMG 714PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Age, Customized
18 - 64 years
12 Participants2 Participants14 Participants
Age, Customized
65 - 84 years
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants7 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes (IELs) Versus Total IELs62.86 percentage of aberrant IELs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.889
57.60 percentage of aberrant IELs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.199
60.94 percentage of aberrant IELs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.55
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
19 Participants9 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants3 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 198 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 191 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes

The primary endpoint in this study was the change form baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) with respect to total IELs, as assessed by flow cytometry (Immunological Response 1). Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELS) are white blood cells interspersed between epithelial cells of the small and large intestine where they function to preserve the integrity of the mucosal barrier by protecting the epithelium against pathogen or immune-induced pathology. In refractory coeliac disease type 2, aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes make up 20% or more of total intraepithelial lymphocytes. Aberrant IELs were defined by flow cytometry as surface cluster of differentiation (CD)3-negative, intracellular CD3-positive IELs (sCD3-, icCD3+).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol (PP) population included participants who received study drug and provided evaluable data for efficacy analysis, excluded non-evaluable participants and those with major protocol deviations. Participants with atypical RCD-II were also excluded from analyses of Immunological Response 1.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes2.45 percent changeStandard Error 8.83
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intraepithelial Lymphocytes7.30 percent changeStandard Error 11.7
p-value: 0.745190% CI: [-30.26, 20.56]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12

The CeD-GSRS score is derived from a subset of 10 questions from the GSRS questionnaire (questions 1, 4-9, 11, 12 and 14), which are each assessed on a scale of 1 (no discomfort at all) to 7 (very severe discomfort). The total CeD-GSRS score ranges from 10 (no discomfort at all) to 70 (very severe discomfort in all celiac syndromes).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Change From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 12-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Celiac Disease GSRS (CeD-GSRS) Score at Week 120.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
p-value: 0.556195% CI: [-0.64, 0.35]Linear mixed effects repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12

The GSRS is a 15-question 7-scale questionnaire used to assess 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain and reflux. Questions are scored between 1 (no discomfort at all) and 7 (very severe discomfort). The total GSRS score is calculated as the sum of the scores of all 15 questions, and ranges from 15 (no discomfort at all) to 105 (very severe discomfort in all 5 dimensions of gastrointestinal syndromes).

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Change From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 12-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Weekly Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score at Week 120.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
p-value: 0.483295% CI: [-0.53, 0.26]Linear mixed effects repeated measures
Secondary

Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12

Participants were asked to record every bowel movement during the study using an electronic diary. If no bowel movements were experienced by the participant on any given day, the participant was required to document this in the diary.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline10.3 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 5.21
AMG 714Number of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Week 1211.3 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 5.72
PlaceboNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Week 128.3 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 3.39
PlaceboNumber of Weekly Bowel Movements at Baseline and Week 12Baseline7.4 bowel movements per weekStandard Deviation 4.03
p-value: 0.446995% CI: [0.77, 1.8]Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12

The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is a pictorial aid to help participants identify the shape and consistency of their bowel movements. Participants were asked to complete this form daily using an electronic diary at the time of each bowel movement. The BSFS categorizes bowel movements into 7 types, from Type 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts; hard to pass) to Type 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Diarrhoea was defined at least one BSFS score \>= 6 for the given week.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AMG 714Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline52.6 percentage of participants
AMG 714Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12Week 1236.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12Baseline22.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Diarrhea at Baseline and Week 12Week 1244.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 12

The Marsh classification system describes the stages of damage in the small intestine as seen under a microscope, with possible values of 0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, or 3c. A score of 0 (best score) indicates that the intestinal lining is normal and celiac disease highly unlikely, a score of 3c (worst score) indicates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, increased crypt hyperplasia and complete villi atrophy. Improvement is defined as a lower grade on the Marsh score scale compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AMG 714Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 1235.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Marsh Score at Week 1233.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.920495% CI: [0.2, 6.01]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Percent change from baseline in the percentage of aberrant intestinal IELs with respect to intestinal epithelial cells (Immunological Response 2) is a composite endpoint calculated by multiplying the percent of aberrant IEL versus total IELs (per flow cytometry) by the percent of total IEL versus intestinal epithelial cells as assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol (PP) population included participants who received study drug and provided evaluable data for efficacy analysis, excluded non-evaluable participants and those with major protocol deviations. Participants with atypical RCD-II were also excluded from analyses of Immunological Response 2.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Percent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells11.66 percent changeStandard Error 15.79
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Aberrant Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes With Respect to All Intestinal Epithelial Cells49.88 percent changeStandard Error 21.33
p-value: 0.180395% CI: [-95.73, 19.29]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 12

Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist. The total IEL count is the density of IELs vs intestinal epithelial cells measured by immunohistochemistry.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: The per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Percent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 1226.84 percent changeStandard Error 17.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count at Week 1239.57 percent changeStandard Error 24.95
p-value: 0.688595% CI: [-77.57, 52.12]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio

Villi are the small fingerlike projections that line the small intestine and promote nutrient absorption and are often shortened in patients with celiac disease. Crypts are grooves between the villi that are often elongated in patients with celiac disease. A decreased VH:CD ratio indicates worsening disease and increases in the VH:CD ratio indicate an improvement in the histology of intestinal mucosa (Histological Response). Small bowel biopsies were performed at baseline and week 12; histological assessments were performed by a blinded central pathologist.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AMG 714Percent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio26.44 percent changeStandard Error 14.06
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Villous Height to Crypt Depth (VH:CD) Ratio15.77 percent changeStandard Error 19.36
p-value: 0.660795% CI: [-38.97, 60.31]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026