Skip to content

The Use of CoreBone Coral Particles vs. Cones for Preservation of Alveolar Bone

Comparison Between CoreBone Coral Particles and CoreBone Coral Cones as Graft After Extraction Sockets for Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02632734
Acronym
CoreBone
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-12-17
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2015-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss

Keywords

alveolar bone preservation, coral grafting device

Brief summary

Normally, dentists do not graft the socket after extraction of teeth. When they do graft they use particulate graft devices. The purpose of this study is to examine whether coral particles of 300-450um in comparison to coral cones of 4-5mm wide and 8-10 mm long will preserve alveolar ridge of maxilla or mandible when grafted immediately after tooth extraction. The coral grafting devices are processed from Porites corals grown in aquariums, under controlled environment. The devices are cleansed and sterilized by gamma irradiation. The measurements during follow ups will be performed from CT x rays and measurements by caliber and models.The width and height measurements from follow up x rays and models. The study will be performed on 10 patients, that two parallel teeth are diagnosed to be extracted, in same patient.The data will be analysed for bone loss and compared to previous published studies. Also comparison between two devices will be performed.

Detailed description

Normally, dentists do not graft the socket after extraction of teeth. When they do graft they use particulate graft devices.The purpose of this study is to examine whether coral particles of 300-450um in comparison to coral cones of 4-5mm wide and 8-10 mm long will preserve alveolar ridge of maxilla or mandible when grafted immediately after tooth extraction. Methods: 10 patients adults that are diagnosed for extraction of same tooth number ,each on different side of jaw. A non traumatic extraction will be performed, on both sides, sometimes not on same date. After extraction, coral device 'CoreBone500' sterile particles will fill the extraction site. Usually 0.3cc will be used. On the other side of same jaw 'CoreBone' Cone sterile of 4-5mm width and 8-10mm height will be placed in socket. Sutures will be placed and efforts will be put in covering the opening by soft tissues. Follow up of the alveolar ridge preservation will be performed using CT at time of grafting and 6 month later. Measurements during follow ups will be performed by caliber the width and height of alveolar ridge 2 weeks, 3month and 6 month follow up. A clinical follow up of healing soft tissues after grafting and patients complaints of pain will be addressed. If any unusual complaints from patients appears the study will be terminated immediately. From our preclinical studies no adverse effects were found. The analysis of data will be statistically analysed and compared to published data. We expect that CoreBone Cones are more effective in ridge preservation.

Interventions

DEVICECoreBone Cone device

coral derived devices in the form of Cones are placed in extraction sites for preservation of bone during 6month and more.

DEVICECoreBone 500 device

coral derived devices in the form of particulate (CoreBone 500) are placed in extraction sites for preservation of bone. Follow up during 6month and more.

Sponsors

The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriya
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy individuals

Exclusion criteria

* smoking * wound healing is disturbance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone loss will be measured from dental impression models of the grafted site by caliper2 weeks, 3 month, 6 month after graftingThe bone loss will be measured from dental impression models of the grafted site that will be taken 2 weeks,3 month,6 month after grafting,using a caliper for measurements from models.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
preferred device for socket preservation2yearIn addition a comparison between bone loss when CoreBone500 device will be grafted and CoreBone Cone.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026