Leg Ulcers, Varicose Ulcers, Venous Ulcers
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to test FOOTFIT and enhanced FOOTFIT+, home-based mobile health (mHealth) physical activity (PA) interventions for a minimally ambulatory, chronically-ill, population with leg ulcers. A highly sensitive clinically designed Bluetooth® enabled accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during a progressive and evidence-based non-exertive leg conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) captures minute foot movements and sends the data to a Smartphone. This six-week feasibility study will compare FOOTFIT to FOOTFIT+, with the added connectivity feature, to promote patient-provider communication, evaluate adherence to PA, and assess signals of efficacy on functional outcomes in a very low fitness population.
Detailed description
FOOTFIT is a study of a lower leg conditioning mHealth intervention for patients with venous leg ulcers. The aims are to compare two versions, one of which is enhanced (FOOTFIT+), to determine which has the greatest impact on physical activity adherence, patient-provider communication, and leg function. FOOTFIT and FOOTFIT+ share three components: 1) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during, 2) phased conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) tracked by a, 3) Smartphone that captures signals from BEAT, provides motivational messages, CALF instruction, and automated feedback on progress. Forty patients will be targeted in this six-week study, 20 of which will receive FOOTFIT and 20 FOOTFIT+.
Interventions
DEVICEFOOTFIT
Individuals with venous leg ulcers will be instructed on physical activity movements for their lower legs to be performed over six weeks while wearing a foot based activity monitor (accelerometer) that will send them motivational messages and progress reports. For those in the FOOTFIT Plus group, individuals will have the option to communicate with their wound care provider via text messages, emails or phone calls.
Sponsors
Medical University of South Carolina
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Active venous leg ulcer * Ankle brachial index 0.80 to 1.3 mmHg, a measure of arterial sufficiency * Sedentary-able to only walk a few steps at a time or not farther than 10 feet * Not currently exercising or participate in a PA or physical therapy program * Receives at least weekly wound care anticipated to last for at least six weeks from start of study * Able to don accelerometer - if unable to apply independently, has assistance from other * Capable of using Smartphone
Exclusion criteria
* Co-morbid conditions such as stroke (limits ankle function) * Ulcer from other causes (arterial, diabetic, trauma, surgery) * Documented cognitive impairment (MiniCog) * No 3G service in area where patient resides
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FOOTFIT feasibility | 6 weeks | Measure adherence by recording frequency and intensity of foot/toe movements reported in minutes. |
| FOOTFIT reach | 6 weeks | Measure reach, recorded as qualitative documents on a log of how patients learned about the study. |
| FOOTFIT technology implementation procedures | 6 weeks | Record on study log the number and types of problems encountered with the study nurses teaching participants to use the foot accelerometer technology, the number and types problems reported by patient, the number and types of recommendations made by the participant regarding the use of the accelerometer, and nurse or provider recommendations for changes to refine the foot accelerometer technology, and the number and types of refinements to the technology that were made. |
| FOOTFIT acceptability | 6 weeks | Record on study logs the the number (frequency) and types of interactions such as phone calls, emails or texts, between the patient and provider regarding FOOTFIT+ including reasons (i.e., exercises, adverse events that are related to, and not related to the use of the accelerometer). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy on pain | 6 weeks | Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS) as a single score. |
| Efficacy on walking performance | 6 weeks | The Six Minute Walk Test reported as distance in feet over six minutes time. |
| Efficacy on foot strength | 6 weeks | Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot strength using the dynamometer and reported as pounds per square inch. |
| Efficacy on foot range of motion. | 6 weeks | Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot range of motion using the goniometer and reported in degrees. |
| Efficacy on walking function. | 6 weeks | Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on walking function using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and reported as a sum score. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed