Skip to content

Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions

Randomized Controlled Trial on Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02631161
Enrollment
88
Registered
2015-12-16
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2021-02-01
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Cervical Non-carious Lesion

Brief summary

A glass hybrid restorative system (EQUIA forte) clinically compared to a composite resin based material (Clearfil SE Bond, Filtek Supreme XT) for the treatment of dental non-carious cervical lesions.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, monocenter parallel group study on restoration of tooth with non-carious cervical restorations. Each patient receives cervical restoration(s) either with glass hybrid EQUIA forte or with composite resin/adhesive combination Filtek Supreme XT/Clearfil SE Bond in anterior/posterior tooth region. Restorations will be provided by one experienced operator. One of two independent examiners will evaluate the restorations at baseline (1 week after placement), and after 18, and 36 months according to the FDI criteria. Reliability of examination will be assessed on a random sample of 30 restorations.

Interventions

Restoration of cavities with a Glasshybrid material (Equia Forte)

OTHERFiltek Supreme XT/Clearfil SE Bond

Restoration of cavities with a composite resin based material after placing an adhesive

Sponsors

GC Europe
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* indication of a restorative treatment for a sclerotic non-carious cervical lesion * lesions should be accessible for treatment and visual-tactile re-evaluation * sufficient moisture control should be possible * cervical margins should be located in dentin whereas the coronal margin should be located in enamel

Exclusion criteria

* allergy/hypersensitivity against any of the used materials * participants should not be systematically ill, disabled, pregnant or participating in another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of restorations with a re-intervention per all restorations36 monthsNumber of all restorations with a re-intervention being required per all placed restorations (events/sample)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Restoration score36 monthsscore according to FDI criteria
Costs for initial and retreatmentrecorded initially and, if required, each re-treatment appointment, over the total trial period (i.e. expected 36 months)Costs incurred for staff and material for initial and re-treatments

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026