Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Asian Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy (MK-8835-012)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 26-Week Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Asian Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy (VERTIS-ASIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02630706
Enrollment
506
Registered
2015-12-15
Start date
2015-12-16
Completion date
2017-12-27
Last updated
2018-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin to metformin monotherapy in Asian participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitis (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that the mean reduction from baseline in HbA1C for 15 mg and 5 mg ertugliflozin (tested sequentially) is greater than for placebo.

Detailed description

This study includes a 1-week screening period, an 8-week (or greater) antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) wash-off and/or metformin dose stable period (as necessary), a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, a 26-week double-blind treatment period, and a post-treatment telephone contact 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

Interventions

Ertugliflozin 5 mg oral tablet taken once daily

Ertugliflozin 15 mg (5-mg and 10-mg tablets) oral taken once daily

DRUGPlacebo matching ertugliflozin

Placebo matching ertugliflozin (5-mg and/or 10-mg tablet) oral taken once daily

DRUGMetformin

Participants are to remain on their stable doses of metformin (oral, \>=1500 mg/day) while receiving blinded investigational product during the double-blind treatment period. Participants on metformin \<1500 at screening are up-titrated to \>= 1500 daily.

DRUGGlimepiride

Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride will be initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. Dosing and titration of open-label glimepiride rescue therapy will be at the Investigator's discretion.

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Sponsor was masked.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Asian participants ≥18 years of age at the time of initial Screening. * Type 2 diabetes mellitus as per American Diabetes Association guidelines. * Metformin monotherapy (≥1500 mg/day) with an initial Screening A1C of 7.0-10.5% (53-91 mmol/mol) OR metformin monotherapy (\<1500 mg/day) with an initial Screening A1C of 7.5-11.0% (58-97 mmol/mol) OR dual combination therapy with metformin + sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitor, meglitinide, or alpha-glucosidase inhibitor with an initial Screening A1C of 6.5-9.5% (48-80 mmol/mol). * Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.0 kg/m\^2. * Male or female not of reproductive potential. * Female of reproductive potential who agrees to remain abstinent from heterosexual activity or to use 2 acceptable combinations of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

* History of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis. * History of other specific types of diabetes (e.g., genetic syndromes, secondary pancreatic diabetes, diabetes due to endocrinopathies, drug- or chemical-induced, and post-organ transplant.) * History of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV heart failure within 3 months of study start. * Mean value for triplicate screening sitting systolic blood pressure \>160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure \>90 mm Hg after at least a 5-minute seated rest at screening * Active, obstructive uropathy or indwelling urinary catheter. * History of malignancy ≤5 years prior to study start, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer. * Routinely consumes \>2 alcoholic drinks per day or \>14 alcoholic drinks per week or engages in binge drinking. * Any clinically significant malabsorption condition. * Is on a weight-loss program or weight-loss medication or other medication associated with weight changes and is not weight stable prior to study start. * Has undergone bariatric surgery within the past 12 months or \>12 months and is not weight stable prior to study start. * A known hypersensitivity or intolerance to any sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor. * On a previous clinical study with ertugliflozin. * Is taking blood pressure or lipid altering medications that have not been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to study start. * Current treatment for hyperthyroidism. * Male participants with a serum creatinine \>=1.3 mg/dL (\>=115 mol/L) or female participants with a serum creatinine \>=1.2 mg/dL (\>=106 mol/L) or participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<55 mL/min/1.73m\^2 according to the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation at screening. * An aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) \>2X the upper limit of normal (ULN) range at screening, or a total bilirubin \>1.5 X the ULN unless the participant has a history of Gilbert's. * On thyroid replacement therapy and has not been on a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to study start. * A medical history of active liver disease (other than non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease. * Has been treated with any of the following agents within 12 weeks of study start or during the pre-randomization period: Insulin of any type (except for short-term use during concomitant illness or other stress), other injectable anti-hyperglycemic agents (e.g., pramlintide, exenatide, liraglutide), another SGLT2 inhibitor, bromocriptine, colesevelam, rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, or any other AHA with the exception of the protocol-approved agents. * Is on or likely to require treatment ≥14 consecutive days or repeated courses of pharmacologic doses of corticosteroids. * Has undergone a surgical procedure within 6 weeks prior to study start or has planned major surgery during the study. * Pregnant or breast-feeding, or planning to conceive during the trial, including 14 days following the last dose of study medication. * Planning to undergo hormonal therapy in preparation for egg donation during the trial, including 14 days following the last dose of study medication. * Donated blood or blood products within 6 weeks of study start. * Has Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). * Has blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing hemolysis or unstable red blood cells. * Has clinically important hematological disorders (such as aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodyplastic syndromes, thrombocytopenia.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)Baseline and Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Baseline and Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)Up to 28 weeksAn AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Up to 28 weeksAn AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)Up to 26 weeksAn AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Up to 26 weeksAn AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)Baseline and Week 26This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Baseline and Week 26This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)Baseline and Week 26This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Baseline and Week 26This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)Baseline and Week 26Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)Week 26Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time to Glycemic Rescue TherapyUp to 183 daysPer protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)Up to 149 daysPer protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue ApproachWeek 6: Pre-DoseNo ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)Week 6: Pre-DoseNo ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.Week 26Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Baseline and Week 26Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)Baseline and Week 26The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Baseline and Week 26The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)Week 26A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In total, 1078 participants were screened, and 506 participants were randomized at 50 sites in China, Hong Kong, Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ertugliflozin 5 mg
Ertugliflozin 5 mg oral and matching placebo for ertugliflozin 10 mg, oral, once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values.
170
Ertugliflozin 15 mg
Ertugliflozin 15 mg administered orally once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values.
169
Placebo
Placebo matching ertugliflozin administered orally once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values.
167
Total506

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event211
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up012
Overall StudyPhysician Decision110
Overall StudyPregnancy010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject457

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalErtugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin 15 mg
Age, Continuous56.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
56.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Age Continuous (China Substudy)56.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
56.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Anti-AHA status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) (China Substudy)
Metformin Alone
93 Participants270 Participants85 Participants92 Participants
Anti-AHA status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) (China Substudy)
Metformin + Another AHA
42 Participants136 Participants51 Participants43 Participants
Anti-hyperglycemic Agent (AHA) Status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA)
Metformin alone
121 Participants353 Participants111 Participants121 Participants
Anti-hyperglycemic Agent (AHA) Status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA)
Metformin + Another AHA
46 Participants153 Participants59 Participants48 Participants
Baseline A1C (China Substudy)8.09 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
8.14 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
8.22 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
8.13 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
Baseline eGFR (China Substudy)100.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1
101.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
99.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
102.7 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)99.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2
99.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
97.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2
100.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)165.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.6
167.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.3
170.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36
167.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.1
Baseline FPG (China Substudy)165.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.9
170.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.3
175.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.2
170.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43
Baseline Hemoglobin A1C (A1C)8.13 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
8.12 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92
8.14 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89
8.09 Percentage A1C
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
Body Weight70.1 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
70.3 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
71.4 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
69.5 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Body Weight (China Substudy)70.6 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
70.7 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
71.4 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
70.2 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Country
China
135 Participants406 Participants136 Participants135 Participants
Country
Hong Kong
7 Participants27 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Country
Korea, Republic of
9 Participants32 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Country
Philippines
8 Participants23 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Country
Taiwan
8 Participants18 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Gender (China Substudy)
Female
66 Participants182 Participants65 Participants51 Participants
Gender (China Substudy)
Male
69 Participants224 Participants71 Participants84 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
167 Participants506 Participants170 Participants169 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants225 Participants75 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants281 Participants95 Participants98 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1700 / 1690 / 167
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 17031 / 16944 / 167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 17010 / 1692 / 167

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-1.00 Percentage A1C
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-0.89 Percentage A1C
PlaceboChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-0.20 Percentage A1C
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of the study was the mean change from baseline in HbA1c for 15 mg ertugliflozin is greater than that for placebo.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.85, -0.52]cLDA
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of the study was the mean change from baseline in HbA1c for 5 mg ertugliflozin is greater than that for placebo.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.97, -0.63]cLDA
Primary

Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-1.01 Percentage A1C
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-0.92 Percentage A1C
PlaceboChange From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-0.24 Percentage A1C
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.86, -0.5]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.95, -0.58]cLDA
Primary

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

Time frame: Up to 26 weeks

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)1.2 Percentage of Participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)0.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)1.8 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

Time frame: Up to 26 weeks

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)0.7 Percentage of Participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)0.7 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)2.2 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)56.5 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)53.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)59.3 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-16.5, 4.6]
95% CI: [-13.3, 7.7]
Primary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product .

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)54.4 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)50.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)59.3 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [-20.5, 3]
95% CI: [-16.5, 6.9]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants and who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-2.95 Kilograms
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-3.18 Kilograms
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-1.17 Kilograms
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.51, -1.5]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.28, -1.28]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-3.11 Kilograms
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-3.38 Kilograms
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-1.33 Kilograms
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.63, -1.21]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.36, -1.21]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-37.09 mg/dL
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-34.47 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-6.69 mg/dL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-33.85, -21.7]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-36.45, -24.35]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-39.01 mg/dL
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-36.67 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-10.46 mg/dL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-32.41, -20.01]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-34.67, -22.43]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-2.38 mmHg
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-2.36 mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-0.96 mmHg
p-value: 0.08695% CI: [-3, 0.2]cLDA
p-value: 0.08195% CI: [-3.01, 0.17]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-2.82 mmHg
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-2.77 mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-1.82 mmHg
p-value: 0.31595% CI: [-2.8, 0.9]cLDA
p-value: 0.28295% CI: [-2.83, 0.83]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-5.09 mmHg
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)-3.87 mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)0.22 mmHg
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.48, -1.69]cLDA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.68, -2.92]cLDA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-5.64 mmHg
Ertugliflozin 15 mgChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-4.19 mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)-1.56 mmHg
p-value: 0.05895% CI: [-5.36, 0.09]cLDA
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-6.78, -1.39]cLDA
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach8.18 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.25
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach27.11 ng/mLStandard Deviation 66.02
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach7.34 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.18
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach26.66 ng/mLStandard Deviation 62.17
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach91.40 ng/mLStandard Deviation 44.77
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach274.23 ng/mLStandard Deviation 146.14
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach6.59 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.53
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach17.54 ng/mLStandard Deviation 24.62
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach91.49 ng/mLStandard Deviation 50.61
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach277.60 ng/mLStandard Deviation 130.66
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach9.17 ng/mLStandard Deviation 18.39
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach24.59 ng/mLStandard Deviation 43.84
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)7.26 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.09
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)24.91 ng/mLStandard Deviation 57.95
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)7.88 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.88
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)22.29 ng/mLStandard Deviation 42.81
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)7.40 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.21
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)23.84 ng/mLStandard Deviation 52.64
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)97.36 ng/mLStandard Deviation 48.98
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)294.49 ng/mLStandard Deviation 124.73
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)6.30 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11.5
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)17.07 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.06
Secondary

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)

No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.

Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ertugliflozin 5 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)94.82 ng/mLStandard Deviation 41.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mgErtugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)285.28 ng/mLStandard Deviation 141.59
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.1.2 Percentage of Participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.0.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.9.6 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-14.5, -5]Miettinen & Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-14, -4.4]Miettinen & Nurminen method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)0.7 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)9.6 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-15.1, -4.2]Miettinen & Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-15.8, -5.7]Miettinen & Nurminen method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)14.7 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)15.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)2.4 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [2.46, 32.22]Logistic regression model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.95, 38.71]Logistic regression model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)14.7 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)17.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)3.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.52, 27.6]Logistic regression model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.44, 28.11]Logistic regression model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)38.2 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)40.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)16.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.49, 8.35]Logistic regression model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.52, 8.36]Logistic regression model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)35.3 Percentage of participants
Ertugliflozin 15 mgPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)42.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)18.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.32, 8.68]Logistic regression model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.77, 6.8]Logistic regression model
Secondary

Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.

Time frame: Up to 183 days

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product who received glycemic rescue through Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ertugliflozin 5 mgTime to Glycemic Rescue TherapyNA Days
Ertugliflozin 15 mgTime to Glycemic Rescue TherapyNA Days
PlaceboTime to Glycemic Rescue TherapyNA Days
Secondary

Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.

Time frame: Up to 149 days

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who received glycemic rescue through Week 26. No participants in the Ertugliflozin 5 mg group were rescued.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ertugliflozin 15 mgTime to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)NA Days
PlaceboTime to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)NA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026