Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin to metformin monotherapy in Asian participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitis (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that the mean reduction from baseline in HbA1C for 15 mg and 5 mg ertugliflozin (tested sequentially) is greater than for placebo.
Detailed description
This study includes a 1-week screening period, an 8-week (or greater) antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) wash-off and/or metformin dose stable period (as necessary), a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, a 26-week double-blind treatment period, and a post-treatment telephone contact 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
Interventions
Ertugliflozin 5 mg oral tablet taken once daily
Ertugliflozin 15 mg (5-mg and 10-mg tablets) oral taken once daily
Placebo matching ertugliflozin (5-mg and/or 10-mg tablet) oral taken once daily
Participants are to remain on their stable doses of metformin (oral, \>=1500 mg/day) while receiving blinded investigational product during the double-blind treatment period. Participants on metformin \<1500 at screening are up-titrated to \>= 1500 daily.
Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride will be initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. Dosing and titration of open-label glimepiride rescue therapy will be at the Investigator's discretion.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Sponsor was masked.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Asian participants ≥18 years of age at the time of initial Screening. * Type 2 diabetes mellitus as per American Diabetes Association guidelines. * Metformin monotherapy (≥1500 mg/day) with an initial Screening A1C of 7.0-10.5% (53-91 mmol/mol) OR metformin monotherapy (\<1500 mg/day) with an initial Screening A1C of 7.5-11.0% (58-97 mmol/mol) OR dual combination therapy with metformin + sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitor, meglitinide, or alpha-glucosidase inhibitor with an initial Screening A1C of 6.5-9.5% (48-80 mmol/mol). * Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.0 kg/m\^2. * Male or female not of reproductive potential. * Female of reproductive potential who agrees to remain abstinent from heterosexual activity or to use 2 acceptable combinations of contraception.
Exclusion criteria
* History of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis. * History of other specific types of diabetes (e.g., genetic syndromes, secondary pancreatic diabetes, diabetes due to endocrinopathies, drug- or chemical-induced, and post-organ transplant.) * History of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV heart failure within 3 months of study start. * Mean value for triplicate screening sitting systolic blood pressure \>160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure \>90 mm Hg after at least a 5-minute seated rest at screening * Active, obstructive uropathy or indwelling urinary catheter. * History of malignancy ≤5 years prior to study start, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer. * Routinely consumes \>2 alcoholic drinks per day or \>14 alcoholic drinks per week or engages in binge drinking. * Any clinically significant malabsorption condition. * Is on a weight-loss program or weight-loss medication or other medication associated with weight changes and is not weight stable prior to study start. * Has undergone bariatric surgery within the past 12 months or \>12 months and is not weight stable prior to study start. * A known hypersensitivity or intolerance to any sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor. * On a previous clinical study with ertugliflozin. * Is taking blood pressure or lipid altering medications that have not been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to study start. * Current treatment for hyperthyroidism. * Male participants with a serum creatinine \>=1.3 mg/dL (\>=115 mol/L) or female participants with a serum creatinine \>=1.2 mg/dL (\>=106 mol/L) or participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<55 mL/min/1.73m\^2 according to the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation at screening. * An aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) \>2X the upper limit of normal (ULN) range at screening, or a total bilirubin \>1.5 X the ULN unless the participant has a history of Gilbert's. * On thyroid replacement therapy and has not been on a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to study start. * A medical history of active liver disease (other than non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease. * Has been treated with any of the following agents within 12 weeks of study start or during the pre-randomization period: Insulin of any type (except for short-term use during concomitant illness or other stress), other injectable anti-hyperglycemic agents (e.g., pramlintide, exenatide, liraglutide), another SGLT2 inhibitor, bromocriptine, colesevelam, rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, or any other AHA with the exception of the protocol-approved agents. * Is on or likely to require treatment ≥14 consecutive days or repeated courses of pharmacologic doses of corticosteroids. * Has undergone a surgical procedure within 6 weeks prior to study start or has planned major surgery during the study. * Pregnant or breast-feeding, or planning to conceive during the trial, including 14 days following the last dose of study medication. * Planning to undergo hormonal therapy in preparation for egg donation during the trial, including 14 days following the last dose of study medication. * Donated blood or blood products within 6 weeks of study start. * Has Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). * Has blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing hemolysis or unstable red blood cells. * Has clinically important hematological disorders (such as aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodyplastic syndromes, thrombocytopenia.)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | Baseline and Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Baseline and Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) | Up to 28 weeks | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. |
| Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Up to 28 weeks | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. |
| Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) | Up to 26 weeks | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. |
| Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Up to 26 weeks | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | Baseline and Week 26 | This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Baseline and Week 26 | This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | Baseline and Week 26 | This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Baseline and Week 26 | This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) | Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | Baseline and Week 26 | Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation) | Week 26 | Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. |
| Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy | Up to 183 days | Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. |
| Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation) | Up to 149 days | Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. |
| Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | Week 6: Pre-Dose | No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL. |
| Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | Week 6: Pre-Dose | No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL. |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26. | Week 26 | Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Baseline and Week 26 | Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | Baseline and Week 26 | The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Baseline and Week 26 | The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) | Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
| Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | Week 26 | A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
In total, 1078 participants were screened, and 506 participants were randomized at 50 sites in China, Hong Kong, Republic of Korea, the Philippines, and Taiwan.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg Ertugliflozin 5 mg oral and matching placebo for ertugliflozin 10 mg, oral, once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. | 170 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg Ertugliflozin 15 mg administered orally once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. | 169 |
| Placebo Placebo matching ertugliflozin administered orally once daily for 26 weeks, while maintaining metformin at a stable dose (\>=1500 mg/day). Glycemic rescue therapy with open-label glimepiride was initiated in participants with glucose values exceeding protocol-specified values. | 167 |
| Total | 506 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 5 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Total | Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 56.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 | 56.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 56.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 |
| Age Continuous (China Substudy) | 56.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 56.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 56.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 56.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 |
| Anti-AHA status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) (China Substudy) Metformin Alone | 93 Participants | 270 Participants | 85 Participants | 92 Participants |
| Anti-AHA status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) (China Substudy) Metformin + Another AHA | 42 Participants | 136 Participants | 51 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Anti-hyperglycemic Agent (AHA) Status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) Metformin alone | 121 Participants | 353 Participants | 111 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Anti-hyperglycemic Agent (AHA) Status at Screening (Metformin Alone OR Metformin + Another AHA) Metformin + Another AHA | 46 Participants | 153 Participants | 59 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Baseline A1C (China Substudy) | 8.09 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98 | 8.14 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 | 8.22 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 | 8.13 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 |
| Baseline eGFR (China Substudy) | 100.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1 | 101.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9 | 99.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 | 102.7 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8 |
| Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) | 99.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 | 99.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 | 97.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2 | 100.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8 |
| Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | 165.8 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.6 | 167.8 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.3 | 170.1 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 36 | 167.3 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.1 |
| Baseline FPG (China Substudy) | 165.5 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.9 | 170.6 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.3 | 175.7 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.2 | 170.5 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 43 |
| Baseline Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) | 8.13 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 | 8.12 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92 | 8.14 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89 | 8.09 Percentage A1C STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91 |
| Body Weight | 70.1 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 70.3 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 | 71.4 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 | 69.5 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 |
| Body Weight (China Substudy) | 70.6 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 70.7 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 | 71.4 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 | 70.2 Kilograms STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 |
| Country China | 135 Participants | 406 Participants | 136 Participants | 135 Participants |
| Country Hong Kong | 7 Participants | 27 Participants | 10 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Country Korea, Republic of | 9 Participants | 32 Participants | 13 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Country Philippines | 8 Participants | 23 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Country Taiwan | 8 Participants | 18 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Gender (China Substudy) Female | 66 Participants | 182 Participants | 65 Participants | 51 Participants |
| Gender (China Substudy) Male | 69 Participants | 224 Participants | 71 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 167 Participants | 506 Participants | 170 Participants | 169 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 79 Participants | 225 Participants | 75 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 88 Participants | 281 Participants | 95 Participants | 98 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 170 | 0 / 169 | 0 / 167 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 22 / 170 | 31 / 169 | 44 / 167 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 170 | 10 / 169 | 2 / 167 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -1.00 Percentage A1C |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -0.89 Percentage A1C |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -0.20 Percentage A1C |
Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -1.01 Percentage A1C |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -0.92 Percentage A1C |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in A1C (%) at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -0.24 Percentage A1C |
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) | 1.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) | 0.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) | 1.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 0.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 0.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 2.2 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) | 56.5 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) | 53.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product .
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 54.4 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 50.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 59.3 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants and who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -2.95 Kilograms |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -3.18 Kilograms |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -1.17 Kilograms |
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -3.11 Kilograms |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -3.38 Kilograms |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -1.33 Kilograms |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -37.09 mg/dL |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -34.47 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -6.69 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post-baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -39.01 mg/dL |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -36.67 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -10.46 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -2.38 mmHg |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -2.36 mmHg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -0.96 mmHg |
Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -2.82 mmHg |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -2.77 mmHg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -1.82 mmHg |
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -5.09 mmHg |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | -3.87 mmHg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) | 0.22 mmHg |
Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -5.64 mmHg |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -4.19 mmHg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | -1.56 mmHg |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 8.18 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 15.25 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 27.11 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 66.02 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 7.34 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.18 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 26.66 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 62.17 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 91.40 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 44.77 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 274.23 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 146.14 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 6.59 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 12.53 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 17.54 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 24.62 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 91.49 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 50.61 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 277.60 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 130.66 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 9.17 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 18.39 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach | 24.59 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 43.84 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 26: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 7.26 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.09 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 24.91 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 57.95 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 6: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 7.88 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.88 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 22.29 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 42.81 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 7.40 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 12.21 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 23.84 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 52.64 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12: 60 min. Post-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 97.36 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 48.98 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 294.49 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 124.73 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: Pre-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 6.30 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 17.07 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 27.06 |
Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation)
No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo. Lower limit of quantification for ertugliflozin was 0.500 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 18: 60 min. Post-Dose
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one plasma concentration value above the lower limit of quantification. No ertugliflozin plasma concentrations were determined for participants receiving placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 94.82 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations Summary Statistics Over Time: Including Rescue Approach (China Subpopulation) | 285.28 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 141.59 |
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26.
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26. | 1.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26. | 0.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26. | 9.6 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation)
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation) | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation) | 0.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy Through Week 26 (China Subpopulation) | 9.6 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 14.7 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 14.7 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 17.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 38.2 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 40.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) | 16.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation)
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who had at least one assessment of the respective endpoint at baseline or post baseline up to Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 35.3 Percentage of participants |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 42.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With HbA1c of <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation Based on cLDA Model: Excluding Rescue Approach) (China Subpopulation) | 18.5 Percentage of participants |
Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Up to 183 days
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of investigational product who received glycemic rescue through Week 26.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg | Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy | NA Days |
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy | NA Days |
| Placebo | Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy | NA Days |
Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation)
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride and dosed according to Investigator judgment.
Time frame: Up to 149 days
Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants in China who received at least one dose of investigational product and who received glycemic rescue through Week 26. No participants in the Ertugliflozin 5 mg group were rescued.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg | Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation) | NA Days |
| Placebo | Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy (China Subpopulation) | NA Days |