Skip to content

Neurostimulation and Electromyographs Assessment of th TetraGraph in Healthy (Volunteers

Neurostimulation and Electromyographs Assessment of th TetraGraph in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02630576
Acronym
NEAT-2
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-12-15
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Electromyography, Neuromuscular Monitoring

Keywords

electromyography, neuromuscular blockade

Brief summary

TetraGraph is a newly developed EMG-based (electromyograph), quantitative, battery-powered neuromuscular monitoring system intended for daily clinical use. The primary aim of this clinical investigation is to examine the applicability (ease of use, equipment need, etc.), repeatability (precision or internal consistency) and performance (signal quality, accuracy of outcome, voltage of stimulation output before and during a stimulus) and tolerability of the Tetragraph device in healthy volunteers.

Detailed description

The primary endpoint will be assessment of the ability of the TetraGraph prototype to deliver neuro-stimulation, and assessment of the ability to acquire muscle action potentials and record these evoked responses on the SD-card. The study will be performed on healthy volunteers - 10 male and 10 female. Testing will be done at two separate stimulation/recording sites: ulnar nerve stimulation/abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle recording; and ulnar nerve stimulation/adductor pollices (AP) muscle recording. The side of testing (RIGHT vs. LEFT hand) will be determined a priori and randomly by the principal investigator, such that 10 volunteers each will be tested on the RIGHT and 10 on the LEFT hands. At each stimulating/recording site two stimulation protocols (single twitch stimulation and train-of-four stimulation) will be performed with growing current intensity (10-60 mA (milliAmps), in a 10 mA step-up fashion). Volunteers will rate the tolerability of each stimulation protocols on a visual analogue scale. EMG data will be recorded on the SD card and evaluated off-line.

Interventions

Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity

Sponsors

University of Debrecen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Volunteer is American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III (Tabl * Volunteer has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease * Use of medications known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission * Presence of renal or hepatic disease * Subject has only one upper extremity * Subject has open sores at the skin sites needed for electrode application

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary performance assessment of TetraGraph deviceSubjects will be followed for the time of measurements an expected avarage of one hourThe primary objective of this study is the assessment of the ability of the prototype to deliver neuro-stimulation, and assessment of the ability to acquire muscle action potentials and record these evoked responses on the SD-card.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary performance assessment of TetraGraph DeviceSubjects will be followed for the time of measurements an expected avarage of one hourThe secondary outcome measures is a composite of several performance data: 1. Confirmation that the prototype can independently stimulate and record repetitive patterns of neuro-stimulation (1 Hz ST and TOF); 2. Verify that stimulus artifact will not exceed 2.0 mV( millivolt), nor overlap with the evoked EMG response when a stimulus is applied; 3. Validate the consistency of delivered stimuli, assessed by repeatability of evoked responses. 4. Verify delivery of neuro-stimulation at varying currents, from the lowest current that produces an evoked response to the current above which the evoked response no longer increases, at increasing current levels separated by steps of 10 mA; 5. Determine any difference in recording performance using evoked responses (1 Hz ST, TOF) between recordings at two different hand muscles, the abductor digiti minimi and adductor pollices muscles; 6. Document consistency of stimulation at constant currents independent of patient age, sex, handedness or

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety assessment of TetraGraph deviceSubjects will be followed for the time of measurements an expected avarage of one hourThe safety of Tetragraph device will be assesses by checking the stimulating and recording electrode positions for skin reactions and by establishing the discomfort, if any, associated with nerve stimulation in awake, un-medicated human volunteers. Assessment will be made using an 11-point visual analog score (VAS) scale, anchored with 0 (representing no distress) and 10 (representing the worst distress ever experienced) (Table I). These VAS scores will be compared to those reported in the literature.

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026