Skip to content

Oxytocin vs. Placebo for the Treatment Hyperphagia in Children and Adolescents With Prader-Willi Syndrome

Oxytocin vs. Placebo for the Treatment Hyperphagia in Children and Adolescents With Prader-Willi Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02629991
Acronym
OXT-PWS
Enrollment
23
Registered
2015-12-15
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2021-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperphagia, Prader-Willi Syndrome

Keywords

Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS), Hyperphagia

Brief summary

The investigators propose a randomized double-blind 8 week treatment trial of intranasal oxytocin (IN-OXT) vs. placebo in 24 subjects aged 5 to 18 years with PWS in order to assess IN-OXT's affect on (1) Eating behaviors (2) Repetitive and disruptive behaviors and (3) Salivary OXT levels.

Detailed description

The investigators propose to conduct a treatment study of intranasal oxytocin (IN-OXT) vs. placebo in children and adolescents with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS). OXT has already been proven safe and effective in a treatment study of socialization and disruptive behavior in adults with PWS and is being used in infants with PWS in an ongoing clinical trial. The investigators hypothesize that OXT will be superior to placebo and have a positive effect on child and adolescent PWS eating and repetitive behaviors. Additional knowledge of OXT's ability to reduce overeating could lead to improvement of patient's quality of life and physical health and reduction in familial stress. The investigators propose a randomized double-blind 8 week treatment trial of intranasal OXT vs. placebo in 24 subjects aged 5 to 18 years with PWS in order to assess IN-OXT's affect on (1) Eating behaviors (2) Repetitive and disruptive behaviors and (3) Salivary OXT levels. If superior to placebo, this data will add to the current knowledge that OXT is an effective treatment for hyperphagia as well as other problematic symptomatology of PWS.

Interventions

Participants were instructed to take 16 IU/per day everyday (2 puffs per nostril, 4 IU each puff).

OTHERMatched Placebo

Participants were instructed to take 16 IU/per day everyday (2 puffs per nostril, 4 IU each puff).

Sponsors

Foundation for Prader-Willi Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or Female child outpatients aged 5 to 18 years 2. Diagnosis of PWS confirmed by genetic testing and patient medical records and history 3. Stable pharmacologic, educational, behavioral and/or dietary interventions for 4 weeks prior to the study start, and for the duration of the study. 4. Have a physical exam and laboratory results that are within the norms for PWS 5. Have a parent/caregiver/guardian that is able to consent for their participation and complete assessments regarding the child's development and behavior improvement throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Exposure to any investigational agent in the 30 days prior to randomization 2. Prior chronic treatment with oxytocin. 3. A primary psychiatric diagnosis other than ASD, including bipolar disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD or major depressive disorder. These patients will be excluded due to potential confounding results. 4. Pregnant or lactating patients. IN-OXT has not been studied in pregnant or lactating women. 5. A medical condition that might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound interpretation of study results or endanger their own well-being. 6. Plan to initiate or change nonpharmacologic or pharmacologic interventions during the course of the study. 7. Females using an estrogen-based contraceptive. As an alternative to an estrogen based contraceptive, subjects will be counseled to use progesterone-based contraceptives; cervical caps; cervical sponges; or spermicidal foam in combination with a condom. Subjects will need to use a double barrier method to be in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreAssessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total Score. The HQ is a 11-item clinician-rated instrument that was designed to measure food related behaviors in PWS. Items map onto 3 subscales; Hyperphagic Behavior, Hyperphagic Drive, and Hyperphagia Severity. The subscales are summed together to compute the Total Score. The Total Score ranges from 11-55, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagia and a worse outcome.
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreAssessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor Score assesses food seeking behaviors (e.g., stealing food). The Behavior Factor Score ranges from 5-25, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagic behaviors and a worse outcome.
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreAssessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor Score assesses the persistence in asking for food. The Drive Factor Score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher hyperphagic drive and a worse outcome
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreAssessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Severity Factor Score assesses the severity of hyperphagia. The Severity Factor Score ranges from 2-10, with higher scores indicating higher severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor Score assesses self-injurious behaviors. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more self-injurious behaviors and a worse outcome.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor Score assesses ritualistic behaviors. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicating more ritualistic behaviors and a worse outcome.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor Score assesses restricted interests. Scores range from 0-12, with higher scores indicating more restricted interests and a worse outcome.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor Score assesses the need for sameness in the environment. Scores range from 0-33, with higher scores indicating more need for sameness and a worse outcome.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor Score assesses stereotyped behaviors. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicating more stereotyped behaviors and a worse outcome.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreTrends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor Score assesses compulsive behaviors. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more compulsive behaviors and a worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intranasal Oxytocin
Participants were instructed to take 16 IU/per day everyday (2 puffs per nostril, 4 IU each puff).
11
Matched Placebo
Participants were instructed to take 16 IU/per day everyday (2 puffs per nostril, 4 IU each puff).
12
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMatched PlaceboTotalIntranasal Oxytocin
Age, Continuous8.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.82
8.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68
9.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Baseline BMI21.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.05
20.92 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.47
20.61 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.04
Baseline Height (cm)124.91 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.71
132.92 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.11
141.65 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.23
Baseline Weight (kg)38.53 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.97
40.25 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.89
42.13 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)-Total30.58 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
29.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.34
27.91 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants18 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 117 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor Score

The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor Score assesses food seeking behaviors (e.g., stealing food). The Behavior Factor Score ranges from 5-25, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagic behaviors and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Assessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline9.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.01
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 49.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 89.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline9.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.47
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 47.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 88.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
p-value: 0.088Mixed effects model
Primary

Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor Score

The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor Score assesses the persistence in asking for food. The Drive Factor Score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher hyperphagic drive and a worse outcome

Time frame: Assessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreBaseline10.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreWeek 411 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreWeek 810.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreBaseline13.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreWeek 410.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Drive Factor ScoreWeek 810.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.48
p-value: 0.027Mixed effects model
Primary

Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor Score

The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Severity Factor Score assesses the severity of hyperphagia. The Severity Factor Score ranges from 2-10, with higher scores indicating higher severity.

Time frame: Assessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreBaseline7.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreWeek 47.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreWeek 86.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreBaseline7.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreWeek 45.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) -Severity Factor ScoreWeek 86.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
p-value: 0.16Mixed effects model
Primary

Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total Score

The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total Score. The HQ is a 11-item clinician-rated instrument that was designed to measure food related behaviors in PWS. Items map onto 3 subscales; Hyperphagic Behavior, Hyperphagic Drive, and Hyperphagia Severity. The subscales are summed together to compute the Total Score. The Total Score ranges from 11-55, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagia and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Assessed trends over multiple time points (weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), week 0 (baseline), week 4 and week 8 are reported.

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreBaseline27.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreWeek 427.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.85
Intranasal OxytocinHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreWeek 826.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.67
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreBaseline30.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreWeek 423.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.41
Matched PlaceboHyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total ScoreWeek 825.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.86
p-value: 0.059Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor Score assesses compulsive behaviors. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more compulsive behaviors and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline5.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 44.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 84.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.89
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 45.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 85.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.41
p-value: 0.033Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor Score assesses restricted interests. Scores range from 0-12, with higher scores indicating more restricted interests and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreBaseline3.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.55
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreWeek 42.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.81
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreWeek 82.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.13
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreBaseline5.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.27
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreWeek 44.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.13
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Restricted Interest Factor ScoreWeek 83.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.82
p-value: 0.53Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor Score assesses ritualistic behaviors. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicating more ritualistic behaviors and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline6.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.74
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 44.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.84
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 84.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.73
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline9.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 5
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 46.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.77
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Ritualistic Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 86.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.65
p-value: 0.69Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor Score assesses the need for sameness in the environment. Scores range from 0-33, with higher scores indicating more need for sameness and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreBaseline9.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreWeek 46.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.25
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreWeek 87.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreBaseline14.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.07
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreWeek 48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Sameness Factor ScoreWeek 87.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39
p-value: 0.034Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor Score assesses self-injurious behaviors. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more self-injurious behaviors and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreBaseline5.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreWeek 44.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreWeek 84.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreBaseline2.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreWeek 43.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Self-Injurious Factor ScoreWeek 83.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
p-value: 0.78Mixed effects model
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor Score

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor Score assesses stereotyped behaviors. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicating more stereotyped behaviors and a worse outcome.

Time frame: Trends over multiple time points (Weeks 0, 4, and 8).

Population: 1 subject discontinued oxytocin early and 1 subject discontinued placebo early

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 42.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Intranasal OxytocinRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 82.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreBaseline3.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Matched PlaceboRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) Stereotyped Behavior Factor ScoreWeek 81.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
p-value: 0.009Mixed effects model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026