Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Cerebral Infarction
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose is to compare the effects of tDCS and constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) in the premotor cortex vs. primary motor cortex in severely subacute stroke survivors.
Detailed description
Stroke survivors experience one or more movement-related impairments and activity limitations. In this sense, the premotor cortex (PMC) can be considered as an alternative locus for post-stroke rehabilitation. In relation to physical rehabilitation protocols, associate to neuromodulation, the investigators have chosen a standardized physical therapy protocol for this study, the Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), which presents evidence of good therapeutic results. The investigators hypothesized that applying tDCS and CIMT over the PMC promotes motor restoration in stroke patients.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 18 and 65 years * Diagnosis of unilateral, non-recurring, subacute stroke * Participants also had to be able, by using any method of pinch, to grasp a washcloth from a table top, lift it up a few inches, and release it.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with difficulty to follow the procedures or understand the instructions; cognitive deficits * tDCS criteria: * use of modulators of the Central Nervous System drugs * patients with implanted metallic or electronic devices * pacemaker * seizures * pregnancy * any other condition that might limit or interfere in the sensorimotor system
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Functional Independence measured by Barthel Index | Change for functional independence at baseline and week 2 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale) | Baseline and Week 2 |
| Muscle strength (Medical Research Council Scale) | Baseline and Week 2 |
Countries
Brazil