Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Work productivity, patient-reported QoL(Quality of Life)
Brief summary
The study is designed as a prospective, observational study to assess the effect of adalimumab on health-related quality of life (QoL) and work productivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Korea.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject has a diagnosis of RA as defined by the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and/or the ACR/the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria (any duration since diagnosis). * Male or female subject ≥ 18 years of age (local definition according to adalimumab label) who is in compliance with eligibility for adalimumab based on the local label. * Patients with moderate to severe RA defined as Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) (ESR) or DAS28 (CRP) \> 3.2 * Biologically treatment naïve and initiated adalimumab at baseline visit * Availability of clinical data of the previous 12 weeks prior to baseline * Ability to self-complete patient questionnaires * Subject must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of this study protocol.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding at enrolment or wish to become pregnant in the next 24 weeks. * Participation in any RA-related clinical trial at the time of enrolment, at baseline or at any point during the past 24 weeks prior to baseline * Patients who in the clinician's view, may not be able to accurately report their QoL or prior resource utilization * Patients who in the clinician's view, may not be able to adhere to adalimumab therapy over 24 weeks.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 | Baseline and week 24 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24 | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as an improvement of -0.22 points or greater in the HAQ-DI score. |
| Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24 | Baseline, week 12, and week 24 | The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included the following subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24 | Baseline, week 12, and week 24 | The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life states (mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems') within a particular EQ-5D-3L dimension. The EQ-5D-3L results were converted into a weighted health state index with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24 | Baseline, week 12, and week 24 | The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Baseline, week 12 and week 24 | Participants were asked to answer the following four questions as either Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, or Very dissatisfied. Question 1: Satisfaction with RA treatment in improving morning stiffness in and around the joints Question 2: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving mobility Question 3: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving the ability to perform daily living requiring fine motor skills Questions 4: Satisfaction with RA treatment overall |
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | 24 weeks | The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis | 24 weeks | The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis | 24 weeks | The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis | 24 weeks | The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study. |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | 24 weeks | The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Ninety-one patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled at nine different sites in Korea.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Adalimumab Participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis who were prescribed adalimumab according to their physician's discretion and routine clinical practice. | 91 |
| Total | 91 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Adalimumab | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 55.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | — |
| Heath Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) | 1.33 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 64 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 27 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 91 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 6 / 91 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 91 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Population: Participants who were still receiving adalimumab at week 24 and with available HAQ-DI data at baseline and week 24.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 | -0.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life states (mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems') within a particular EQ-5D-3L dimension. The EQ-5D-3L results were converted into a weighted health state index with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24 | Week 12 | 0.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24 | Week 24 | 0.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Participants who were still receiving adalimumab at week 24 and with available HAQ-DI data at baseline and week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12 | -0.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included the following subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24 | Physical Component Score at Week 12 | 6.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.98 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24 | Physical Component Score at Week 24 | 9.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.77 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24 | Mental Component Score at Week 12 | 5.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.62 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24 | Mental Component Score at Week 24 | 6.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.31 |
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24
Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point. Overall work impairment was only assessed in participants who were employed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24 | Overall Work Impairment at Week 12 | -19 percent impairment | Standard Deviation 32 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24 | Overall Work Impairment at Week 24 | -25 percent impairment | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24 | Activity Impairment at Week 12 | -15 percent impairment | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Adalimumab | Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24 | Activity Impairment at Week 24 | -25 percent impairment | Standard Deviation 34 |
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis
The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis | Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) | 36 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis | Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) | 32 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis | Others | 26 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis | Any Concomitant Medication | 44 Participants |
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Blood sample taken | 61 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Chest X-Ray | 19 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Spine X-Ray | 5 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Neck X-Ray | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Shoulder X-Ray | 4 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Hand X-Ray | 4 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Knee X-Ray | 5 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | 0 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Computed tomography (CT) scan | 4 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Electrocardiogram | 4 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Urine test | 35 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Endoscopy | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Bone scan | 1 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Liver function test | 8 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Tuberculin Skin Test | 3 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Sputum tests | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Other | 8 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Any Procedure | 67 Participants |
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis
The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis | 3 Participants |
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis
The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis | 0 Participants |
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Family medicine | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Rheumatologist | 87 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Orthopaedist | 4 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Rehabilitation Medicine | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Other | 2 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Internist | 6 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Emergency department | 0 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Traditional Medicine | 3 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis | Any healthcare professional | 87 Participants |
Patient Treatment Satisfaction
Participants were asked to answer the following four questions as either Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, or Very dissatisfied. Question 1: Satisfaction with RA treatment in improving morning stiffness in and around the joints Question 2: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving mobility Question 3: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving the ability to perform daily living requiring fine motor skills Questions 4: Satisfaction with RA treatment overall
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 26 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat dissatisfied | 21 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 26 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very satisfied | 9 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 25 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat dissatisfied | 21 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 32 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat satisfied | 12 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very dissatisfied | 10 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat dissatisfied | 25 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very satisfied | 12 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very dissatisfied | 12 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat satisfied | 14 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very dissatisfied | 13 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat satisfied | 15 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very satisfied | 9 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very satisfied | 6 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat dissatisfied | 21 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very dissatisfied | 18 Participants |
| Adalimumab | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat satisfied | 25 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 16 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very satisfied | 27 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very satisfied | 27 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 17 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat dissatisfied | 7 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very dissatisfied | 4 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very satisfied | 27 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat satisfied | 24 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 18 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat dissatisfied | 7 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very dissatisfied | 3 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat satisfied | 24 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 19 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat dissatisfied | 7 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very dissatisfied | 2 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very satisfied | 32 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat satisfied | 22 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat satisfied | 24 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat dissatisfied | 7 Participants |
| Week 12 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very dissatisfied | 2 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 16 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat dissatisfied | 6 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very satisfied | 27 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat satisfied | 19 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very dissatisfied | 1 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very dissatisfied | 2 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very dissatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Very satisfied | 32 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Somewhat dissatisfied | 6 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat dissatisfied | 6 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 4 - Treatment overall | Somewhat satisfied | 17 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Very dissatisfied | 2 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Very satisfied | 33 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat dissatisfied | 7 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 14 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Somewhat satisfied | 16 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 13 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 1 - morning stiffness | Very satisfied | 30 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 3 - Fine motor skills | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 15 Participants |
| Week 24 | Patient Treatment Satisfaction | Question 2 - Mobility | Somewhat satisfied | 22 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24
The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as an improvement of -0.22 points or greater in the HAQ-DI score.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24
Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24 | Week 12 | 65.8 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24 | Week 24 | 77.5 percentage of participants |