Skip to content

Real-World Outcome of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Korea on Adalimumab

Real-World Outcome of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Korea on Adalimumab (ROCKA Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02627924
Acronym
ROCKA
Enrollment
91
Registered
2015-12-11
Start date
2015-11-18
Completion date
2017-12-28
Last updated
2019-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Work productivity, patient-reported QoL(Quality of Life)

Brief summary

The study is designed as a prospective, observational study to assess the effect of adalimumab on health-related quality of life (QoL) and work productivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Korea.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has a diagnosis of RA as defined by the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and/or the ACR/the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria (any duration since diagnosis). * Male or female subject ≥ 18 years of age (local definition according to adalimumab label) who is in compliance with eligibility for adalimumab based on the local label. * Patients with moderate to severe RA defined as Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) (ESR) or DAS28 (CRP) \> 3.2 * Biologically treatment naïve and initiated adalimumab at baseline visit * Availability of clinical data of the previous 12 weeks prior to baseline * Ability to self-complete patient questionnaires * Subject must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of this study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding at enrolment or wish to become pregnant in the next 24 weeks. * Participation in any RA-related clinical trial at the time of enrolment, at baseline or at any point during the past 24 weeks prior to baseline * Patients who in the clinician's view, may not be able to accurately report their QoL or prior resource utilization * Patients who in the clinician's view, may not be able to adhere to adalimumab therapy over 24 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24Baseline and week 24The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, week 12 and week 24The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as an improvement of -0.22 points or greater in the HAQ-DI score.
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, week 12, and week 24The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included the following subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, week 12, and week 24The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life states (mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems') within a particular EQ-5D-3L dimension. The EQ-5D-3L results were converted into a weighted health state index with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, week 12, and week 24The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Patient Treatment SatisfactionBaseline, week 12 and week 24Participants were asked to answer the following four questions as either Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, or Very dissatisfied. Question 1: Satisfaction with RA treatment in improving morning stiffness in and around the joints Question 2: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving mobility Question 3: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving the ability to perform daily living requiring fine motor skills Questions 4: Satisfaction with RA treatment overall
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12Baseline and week 12The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis24 weeksThe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis24 weeksThe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis24 weeksThe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis24 weeksThe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.
Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis24 weeksThe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Ninety-one patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled at nine different sites in Korea.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adalimumab
Participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis who were prescribed adalimumab according to their physician's discretion and routine clinical practice.
91
Total91

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumab
Age, Continuous55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Heath Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)1.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 91
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24

The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Participants who were still receiving adalimumab at week 24 and with available HAQ-DI data at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24

The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life states (mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of three responses. The responses record three levels of severity ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems') within a particular EQ-5D-3L dimension. The EQ-5D-3L results were converted into a weighted health state index with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24

Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24Week 120.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index at Weeks 12 and 24Week 240.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Comparison: Change from Baseline in EQ-5D-3L at 12 weeksp-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline in EQ-5D-3L at 24 weeksp-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12

The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Participants who were still receiving adalimumab at week 24 and with available HAQ-DI data at baseline and week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24

The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included the following subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24

Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Physical Component Score at Week 126.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.98
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Physical Component Score at Week 249.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Mental Component Score at Week 125.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.62
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores at Weeks 12 and 24Mental Component Score at Week 246.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.31
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score at Week 12p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score at Week 24p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score at Week 12p-value: 0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score at Week 24p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in RA consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, week 12, and week 24

Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point. Overall work impairment was only assessed in participants who were employed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24Overall Work Impairment at Week 12-19 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 32
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24Overall Work Impairment at Week 24-25 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 31
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24Activity Impairment at Week 12-15 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 31
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) at Weeks 12 and 24Activity Impairment at Week 24-25 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 34
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment at Week 12p-value: 0.0098Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment at Week 24p-value: 0.0015Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Activity Impairment at Week 12p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Change From Baseline in Activity Impairment at Week 24p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis

The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid ArthritisDisease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD)36 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid ArthritisAnti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID)32 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid ArthritisOthers26 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications for Rheumatoid ArthritisAny Concomitant Medication44 Participants
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisBlood sample taken61 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisChest X-Ray19 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisSpine X-Ray5 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisNeck X-Ray2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisShoulder X-Ray4 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisHand X-Ray4 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisKnee X-Ray5 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)0 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisComputed tomography (CT) scan4 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisElectrocardiogram4 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisUrine test35 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisEndoscopy2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisBone scan1 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisLiver function test8 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisTuberculin Skin Test3 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisSputum tests2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisOther8 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants Who Underwent Procedures Related to Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisAny Procedure67 Participants
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis

The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Hospitalization Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis3 Participants
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis

The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Surgery Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis0 Participants
Secondary

Healthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

The healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) questionnaire collected data on the healthcare resources used over the course of the study.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Enrolled participants who did not discontinue adalimumab during the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisFamily medicine2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatologist87 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisOrthopaedist4 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisRehabilitation Medicine2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisOther2 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisInternist6 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisEmergency department0 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisTraditional Medicine3 Participants
AdalimumabHealthcare Resource Utilization: Number of Participants With Visits to Healthcare Professionals for Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisAny healthcare professional87 Participants
Secondary

Patient Treatment Satisfaction

Participants were asked to answer the following four questions as either Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, or Very dissatisfied. Question 1: Satisfaction with RA treatment in improving morning stiffness in and around the joints Question 2: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving mobility Question 3: Satisfaction with RA treatment improving the ability to perform daily living requiring fine motor skills Questions 4: Satisfaction with RA treatment overall

Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied26 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat dissatisfied21 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied26 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery satisfied9 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied25 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat dissatisfied21 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied32 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat satisfied12 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery dissatisfied10 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat dissatisfied25 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery satisfied12 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery dissatisfied12 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat satisfied14 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery dissatisfied13 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat satisfied15 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery satisfied9 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery satisfied6 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat dissatisfied21 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery dissatisfied18 Participants
AdalimumabPatient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat satisfied25 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied16 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery satisfied27 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery satisfied27 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied17 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat dissatisfied7 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery dissatisfied4 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery satisfied27 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat satisfied24 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied18 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat dissatisfied7 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery dissatisfied3 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat satisfied24 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied19 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat dissatisfied7 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery dissatisfied2 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery satisfied32 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat satisfied22 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat satisfied24 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat dissatisfied7 Participants
Week 12Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery dissatisfied2 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied16 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat dissatisfied6 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery satisfied27 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat satisfied19 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery dissatisfied1 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery dissatisfied2 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery dissatisfied0 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallVery satisfied32 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessSomewhat dissatisfied6 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat dissatisfied6 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 4 - Treatment overallSomewhat satisfied17 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityVery dissatisfied2 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsVery satisfied33 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat dissatisfied7 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied14 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsSomewhat satisfied16 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilityNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied13 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 1 - morning stiffnessVery satisfied30 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 3 - Fine motor skillsNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied15 Participants
Week 24Patient Treatment SatisfactionQuestion 2 - MobilitySomewhat satisfied22 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24

The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported assessment of physical function that includes 20 items in eight categories representing a comprehensive set of functional activities, including dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst), with a higher score representing a high-dependency disability. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as an improvement of -0.22 points or greater in the HAQ-DI score.

Time frame: Baseline, week 12 and week 24

Population: Participants still receiving adalimumab and with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24Week 1265.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the HAQ-DI at Weeks 12 and 24Week 2477.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026