Skip to content

A Study Comparing Ponatinib and Nilotinib in Participants With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

A Randomized, Open-label Study of Ponatinib Versus Nilotinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Following Resistance to Imatinib

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02627677
Acronym
OPTIC-2L
Enrollment
44
Registered
2015-12-11
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2021-01-20
Last updated
2021-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

CML, CP-CML, Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Neoplasms by Histologic Type, Neoplasms, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases, Hematologic Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 starting doses of ponatinib compared to nilotinib in participants with imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP).

Detailed description

This is a multi-center, randomized study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of 2 starting doses of ponatinib as a treatment for CP-CML compared to nilotinib. Eligible participants must have chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML), be resistant to first-line imatinib treatment and have received no other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Interventions

DRUGPonatinib 30 mg QD

Ponatinib 30 mg, taken orally once daily.

DRUGPonatinib 15 mg QD

Ponatinib 15 mg, taken orally once daily.

DRUGNilotinib 400 mg BID

Nilotinib 400 mg, taken orally twice daily.

Sponsors

Ariad Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have CP-CML and are resistant to first-line imatinib treatment. 2. Be male or female ≥18 years old. 3. Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. 4. Have adequate renal function as defined by the following criterion: • Serum creatinine ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) for institution. 5. Have adequate hepatic function as defined by all of the following criteria: * Total serum bilirubin ≤1.5 × ULN, unless due to Gilbert's syndrome * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 × ULN or ≤5 × ULN if leukemic infiltration of the liver is present * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 × ULN or ≤5 × ULN if leukemic infiltration of the liver is present. 6. Have normal pancreatic status as defined by the following criterion: * Serum lipase and amylase ≤1.5 × ULN.

Exclusion criteria

1. Have previously been treated with any approved or investigational TKIs other than imatinib or treated with imatinib within 14 days prior to receiving study drug. 2. Have previously been treated with any anti-CML therapy other than hydroxyurea, including interferon, cytarabine, immunotherapy, or any cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or investigational therapy. 3. Underwent autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant. 4. Are in CCyR or MMR. 5. Have clinically significant, uncontrolled, or active cardiovascular disease, specifically including, but not restricted to: * Any history of myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack (TIA) * Any history of peripheral vascular infarction, including visceral infarction * Any history of a revascularization procedure, including vascular surgery or the placement of a stent * History of venous thromboembolism, including deep venous thrombosis, superficial venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism, within 6 months prior to enrollment * Congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV) within 6 months prior to enrollment or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 45% or less than the institutional lower limit of normal (whichever is higher) within 6 months prior to enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)Up to 12 monthsMMR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ratio of ≤0.1% Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson (BCR ABL) to ABL transcripts on the international scale (≤0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL\[IS\]) at any time within 12 months after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)Up to 12 monthsCCyR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving CCyR up to 12 months after randomization. CCyR is defined as 0% Philadelphia chromosome-positive \[Ph+\] metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow.
Percentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)From Month 3 to every 3 months up to 48 monthsMolecular response rate is defined as percentage of participants achieving MR2: Molecular response with 2-log reduction (defined as ≤1% BCR-ABL\[IS\]), MMR: Major molecular responder, MR4 (defined as ≤0.01% BCR-ABL\[IS\]), and MR4.5 (defined as ≤0.0032% BCR-ABL\[IS\]) after randomization.
Percentage of Participants With MR1Month 3MR1 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ratio of ≤10% BCR ABL to ABL transcripts on the international scale at 3 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)From first dose up to 30 days post last dose (Up to approximately 46 months)TE-AOE: arterial occlusive event with an initial onset date on or after first dose date and no later than 30 days after last dose date of study treatment or events starting after initial consent that worsen in severity on or after first dose date. TE-VTE: vascular occlusive event with an initial onset date on or after first dose date and no later than 30 days after last dose date of study treatment or events starting after initial consent that worsen in severity on or after first dose date. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered pharmaceutical product; untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect/is medically important event.
Time to ResponseUp to approximately 60 monthsTime to MMR defined as the interval between the randomization date and the first date at which the criteria for response was met. MMR was defined as \<=0.1% BCR-ABL.
Percentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)Up to 12 monthsMCyR was the percentage of participants achieving Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR: defined as 0% Philadelphia chromosome-positive \[Ph+\] metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow) or Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR: defined as \>0% to 35% Ph+ metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow) at any time within 12 months after randomization.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to end of study (approximately 60 months)Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the interval between the first dose date of study treatment and the first date at which the criteria for progression was met (progression to AP- or BP CML), or death due to any cause, censored at the last response assessment.
Overall SurvivalUp to end of study (approximately 60 months)Overall survival (OS) defined as the interval between the first dose date of study treatment and date of death due to any cause, censored at the last contact date to be alive.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved/Maintained Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)3 months after the first dose of study treatmentCHR rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving CHR at any time after initiation of study treatment. CHR is defined as achieving all of the following measurements: White blood cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets \<450 x 10\^9/L; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; Basophils in peripheral blood \<5%; No extramedullary involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly).
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionFrom first dose up to end of treatment (Up to approximately 45 months)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Phase (BP)-CMLUp to end of study (Up to approximately 60 months)Progression to AP is defined as: \>=15% and \<30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow or \>=20% basophils in peripheral blood or bone marrow or \>=30% blasts + promyelocytes in peripheral blood or bone marrow (but \<30% blasts) or \<100\*10\^9 platelets/L in peripheral blood unrelated to therapy or cytogenetic, genetic evidence of clonal evolution, and no extramedullary disease. Progression to BP-CML is defined as: \>=30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow or extramedullary disease other than hepatosplenomegaly.
Duration of ResponseUp to approximately 60 monthsDuration of response defined as the interval between the first assessment at which the criteria for response was met until the earliest date at which loss of response occurs, or the criteria for progression was met.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 90 investigative sites in Austria, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Korea, and Russia from 31 December 2015 to 20 January 2021

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia were enrolled and randomised at a ratio of 1:2:1 to receive ponatinib 30 mg and ponatinib 15 mg compared with nilotinib 400 mg.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mg
Ponatinib 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily (QD) until achievement of major molecular response (MMR) up to 12 months. Once MMR was achieved, participants received reduced dose of ponatinib 15 mg orally once daily up to approximately 42 months.
10
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mg
Ponatinib 15 mg, tablets, orally, QD until achievement of MMR up to 12 months. Once MMR was achieved, participants received reduced dose of ponatinib 15 mg orally once daily up to approximately 45 months.
21
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mg
Nilotinib 400 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily up to approximately 42 months.
12
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse event (not progressive disease)141
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy120
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision002
Overall StudyPregnancy010
Overall StudyProgressive disease130
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated100
Overall StudyReason not Specified001
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor5106
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgCohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgCohort C: Nilotinib 400 mg
Age, Continuous47.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.69
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.43
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23
Body Mass Index (BMI)25.44 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95
25.90 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.87
25.35 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.974
25.18 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.442
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height170.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
172.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62
169.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.35
168.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants7 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, North
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
31 Participants8 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants3 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants7 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Weight73.34 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.65
77.50 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.335
72.72 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.213
70.94 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.711

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 101 / 210 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1020 / 2112 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 103 / 212 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)

MMR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ratio of ≤0.1% Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson (BCR ABL) to ABL transcripts on the international scale (≤0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL\[IS\]) at any time within 12 months after randomization.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug, with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)45.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response defined as the interval between the first assessment at which the criteria for response was met until the earliest date at which loss of response occurs, or the criteria for progression was met.

Time frame: Up to approximately 60 months

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgDuration of ResponseNA months
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgDuration of ResponseNA months
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgDuration of ResponseNA months
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) defined as the interval between the first dose date of study treatment and date of death due to any cause, censored at the last contact date to be alive.

Time frame: Up to end of study (approximately 60 months)

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgOverall SurvivalNA months
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgOverall SurvivalNA months
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgOverall SurvivalNA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved/Maintained Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)

CHR rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving CHR at any time after initiation of study treatment. CHR is defined as achieving all of the following measurements: White blood cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets \<450 x 10\^9/L; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; \<5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; Basophils in peripheral blood \<5%; No extramedullary involvement (including no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly).

Time frame: 3 months after the first dose of study treatment

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved/Maintained Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)60.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved/Maintained Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)81.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved/Maintained Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)

CCyR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving CCyR up to 12 months after randomization. CCyR is defined as 0% Philadelphia chromosome-positive \[Ph+\] metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug, with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)55.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)

MCyR was the percentage of participants achieving Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR: defined as 0% Philadelphia chromosome-positive \[Ph+\] metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow) or Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR: defined as \>0% to 35% Ph+ metaphases by cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow) at any time within 12 months after randomization.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: Safety Population included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug, with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)60.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)

Molecular response rate is defined as percentage of participants achieving MR2: Molecular response with 2-log reduction (defined as ≤1% BCR-ABL\[IS\]), MMR: Major molecular responder, MR4 (defined as ≤0.01% BCR-ABL\[IS\]), and MR4.5 (defined as ≤0.0032% BCR-ABL\[IS\]) after randomization.

Time frame: From Month 3 to every 3 months up to 48 months

Population: Safety Population included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Number analyzed are participants with data available for analyses at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 480.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2450.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 4510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2410.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2120.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 4210.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2720.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 4810.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3910.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3020.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2750.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3610.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 330.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 4510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 330.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3610.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3050.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3010.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3920.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2710.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 4210.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 4210.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2410.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2110.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 4510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3330.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 1510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 4810.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1250.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 120.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3920.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 90.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 620.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3650.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 660.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3640.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3920.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1210.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3320.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 4210.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1550.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3040.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 4510.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 370.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2740.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 4810.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 910.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2440.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 330.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1850.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2140.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 630.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1820.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1840.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 930.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 620.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1540.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1240.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2150.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 1810.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 950.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2719.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 124.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2714.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 480.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 338.1 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 657.1 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 952.4 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1252.4 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1552.4 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1847.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2152.4 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2447.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3038.1 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3333.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3633.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3914.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 429.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 4514.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 484.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 34.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 628.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 928.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1233.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 394.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 154.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 219.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2419.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2742.9 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3014.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3314.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3619.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 394.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 420.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 454.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 480.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 60.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 94.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 189.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 219.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 244.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 304.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 334.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 369.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 420.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 450.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1528.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1838.1 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2133.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2433.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2733.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3033.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3328.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3628.6 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3914.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 429.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 459.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 484.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 614.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 99.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 129.5 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1519.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1823.8 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2436.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 489.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 429.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2136.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2145.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 459.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3918.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 489.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1245.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 945.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1827.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1545.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 636.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 1845.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 318.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1854.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2145.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 489.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1527.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2445.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 459.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 69.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 2745.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 429.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1554.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3045.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3918.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 654.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3327.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3636.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 918.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3636.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3327.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 1254.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 3918.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 3045.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 60.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 30.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 345.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 99.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 489.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 1218.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 459.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 429.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 189.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 429.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2754.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2127.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 159.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 1227.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2418.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3918.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 2718.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3627.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR3/MMR - Month 459.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3027.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 339.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 2454.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 330.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 3036.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR2 - Month 945.5 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4.5 - Month 3618.2 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Molecular Response (MR)MR4 - Month 2736.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With MR1

MR1 was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a ratio of ≤10% BCR ABL to ABL transcripts on the international scale at 3 months.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug, with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With MR170.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With MR166.7 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With MR163.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Phase (BP)-CML

Progression to AP is defined as: \>=15% and \<30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow or \>=20% basophils in peripheral blood or bone marrow or \>=30% blasts + promyelocytes in peripheral blood or bone marrow (but \<30% blasts) or \<100\*10\^9 platelets/L in peripheral blood unrelated to therapy or cytogenetic, genetic evidence of clonal evolution, and no extramedullary disease. Progression to BP-CML is defined as: \>=30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow or extramedullary disease other than hepatosplenomegaly.

Time frame: Up to end of study (Up to approximately 60 months)

Population: As the study was terminated, data was not collected and analyzed for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose Interruption

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Time frame: From first dose up to end of treatment (Up to approximately 45 months)

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation10.0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Interruption70.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction19.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation23.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Interruption38.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Interruption41.7 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation, Dose Reduction and Dose InterruptionTEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction33.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)

TE-AOE: arterial occlusive event with an initial onset date on or after first dose date and no later than 30 days after last dose date of study treatment or events starting after initial consent that worsen in severity on or after first dose date. TE-VTE: vascular occlusive event with an initial onset date on or after first dose date and no later than 30 days after last dose date of study treatment or events starting after initial consent that worsen in severity on or after first dose date. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered pharmaceutical product; untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is congenital anomaly/birth defect/is medically important event.

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days post last dose (Up to approximately 46 months)

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-AOE0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-VOEs0 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)AEs100 percentage of participants
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)SAEs40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)SAEs14.3 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-AOE4.8 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)AEs95.2 percentage of participants
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-VOEs0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)SAEs16.7 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-VOEs0 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)AEs100 percentage of participants
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Arterial Occlusive Events (TE-AOEs), Treatment Emergent Venous Thromboembolic Events (TE-VTE), Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)TE-AOE8.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the interval between the first dose date of study treatment and the first date at which the criteria for progression was met (progression to AP- or BP CML), or death due to any cause, censored at the last response assessment.

Time frame: Up to end of study (approximately 60 months)

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgProgression-free Survival (PFS)NA months
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgProgression-free Survival (PFS)NA months
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgProgression-free Survival (PFS)NA months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to MMR defined as the interval between the randomization date and the first date at which the criteria for response was met. MMR was defined as \<=0.1% BCR-ABL.

Time frame: Up to approximately 60 months

Population: Safety Population includes all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study drug. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mgTime to Response3.07 months
Cohort B: Ponatinib 15 mgTime to Response6.29 months
Cohort C: Nilotinib 400 mgTime to Response6.07 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026