Skip to content

Cooling Leg and Foot Ulcer Skin Post Healing to Prevent Ulcer Recurrence

Monitoring and Managing Newly Healed Chronic Leg and Foot Ulcer Skin Temperature: A Cooling Intervention (MUSTCOOL) to Prevent Ulcer Recurrence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02626156
Acronym
MUSTCOOL
Enrollment
140
Registered
2015-12-10
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2021-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot, Foot Ulcer, Leg Ulcer, Varicose Ulcer, Venous Hypertension Ulcers, Venous Insufficiency, Venous Stasis Ulcer, Venous Ulcer

Keywords

post healed venous leg ulcer, posted healed diabetic foot ulcer

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to test MUSTCOOL, a home-based self-monitoring and self-management ulcer prevention intervention for patients with newly healed chronic venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers. Almost 90% of ulcers recur within 3 months of healing. During the six-month randomized clinic trial, skin temperature will be monitored daily, a maintenance dose of cooling gel pack or placebo will be applied three times weekly to the affected skin, and a bolus dose of cooling will be applied for 5 consecutive days if skin temperature becomes elevated. Outcomes on the incidence of leg ulcer recurrence, pain, physical activity and quality of life will be measured.

Detailed description

The goal of this randomized control trial is to test a patient directed self-monitoring and self-management intervention aimed at preventing the recurrence of chronic venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers using skin temperature and cryotherapy (cooling). This MUSTCOOL study is a novel ulcer prevention strategy for patients at highest risk for developing chronic ulcers; those with a previous history. The aims are to compare a cooling treatment to a placebo to determine the outcomes on ulcer recurrence, pain, physical activity and quality of life. Individuals with newly healed chronic ulcers will be invited to participate in MUSTCOOL's two component intervention: 1. self monitoring skin temperature over targeted hot spots daily with an infrared thermometer; and 2. maintenance cooling with a cooling pack (or placebo pack) placed over the hot spot three times each week for 30 minutes. If the temperature of the hot spot becomes elevated 2°F above baseline (average of 30 days of daily temperature readings) for 2 days in a row, a bolus regimen of 5 consecutive daily, 30 minute applications of the cooling or placebo pack will be implemented. The safety and side effects will be monitored, however, there have been no reported adverse events reported in our previous cryotherapy studies. This study was designed as a chronic ulcer prevention intervention that targets the remodeling phase, the final repair process of healing after chronic ulcer closure. The skin environment is particularly vulnerable to ulcer recurrence due to a persistent aberrant inflammatory state. The previous research conducted by the study team has demonstrated that cooling this skin reduces the abnormal metabolic activity, protecting it against ulcer recurrence. Recent advancements in infrared technology allow us to take images of the affect skin to identify the area that has the highest temperature or vulnerable hot spot. These hot spots will be self monitored by patients with newly healed ulcers in the home with an infrared thermometer that date and time stamps each reading. The study's outcomes on physical activity will be evaluated with an accelerometer. It is hypothesized that by improving the skin environment and reducing pain, patients will more likely be physically active and have better quality of life, all measurable goals for this study. This prevention strategy will be evaluated over six months in 180 patients, 90 of whom will be randomized to receive the cooling pack and 90 the placebo. The goal is to test this non-pharmacological, non-invasive clinical intervention as a tailored self-management strategy to prevent chronic ulcer recurrence. It will also determine alleviation of symptoms such as pain, and the debilitating effects on physical activity and quality of life.

Interventions

DEVICECooling gel pack

Individuals will self monitor skin temperature of skin over a recently health venous leg or diabetic foot ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cooling gel pack will be applied to skin of recently healed venous leg or diabetic foot ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increases and stays elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual will cool the skin 5 consecutive days and will continue to monitor skin temperature.

DEVICECooling cotton pack

Individuals will self monitor skin temperature of skin over a recently health venous leg or diabetic foot ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cotton filled pack will be applied to skin of recently healed venous leg or diabetic foot ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increases and stays elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual will cool the skin 5 consecutive days and will continue to monitor skin temperature.

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly healed leg or diabetic foot ulcer within past 7 - 14 days * Ankle brachial index 0.8- 1.3mmHg (rule out absence of arterial disease) * Willing to wear compression stockings and appropriate footwear * Working freezer

Exclusion criteria

* Open leg or foot ulcers * Cognitive impairment: unable to recall 2 or more words or draw clock Mini-Cog™ for cognitive impairment * Chronic inflammatory or vascular conditions where blood flow of skin may be impaired such as Lupus erythematosus, Raynaud's, scleroderma, end stage renal disease, chronic regional pain syndrome, multiple sclerosis, hypersensitivity to cold, on chemotherapy * Unable to preform required protocol activities without assistance (return demonstration to study staff)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical ActivitiesThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineMean time spent in minutes engaging in physical activities, reported via accelerometer data, from baseline to post treatment at 6 months end of intervention for the 4 groups.
Change in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym QuestionnaireThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineThe Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of life/Symptoms (VEINES QOL/Sym) Questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. A sum score is provided as an overall quality of life score for both the QOL and Sym portions of the questionnaire. This instrument was used only for the VLU groups because it is a disease-specific measure. Of the 26 items in the questionnaire, 25 items are combined to create a summary score (VEINES-QOL). One item which asks about the time of day the leg problem is most intense, question 2, provides only descriptive information and is not scored. A subset (symptoms score) of ten of these items, questions 1a to 1i and 7, is used to create a symptom score (VEINES-Sym). For both the VEINES-QOL and VEINES-Sym scores, high values indicate better outcomes. VEINES-QOL scores can be compared only to other members of the same sample. Each set of VEINES-QOL scores will have a mean T-score = 50.
Changes in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventoryThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineThe Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale is reported as an average score. BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning for intensity and Pain Intensity and Pain Interference. Pain Intensity is measured in four categories: worst, least, on average, and currently, while Pain Interference is measured in 7 categories: mood, work, general activity, walking, relationships, enjoyment of life, and sleep. The patient rates each of these on a scale from 0-10, 10 being excruciating pain intensity and a complete interference in their life. Subscores are determined by averaging over the 4 intensity items for the severity subscore and over the 7 interference items for the interference subscore; possible total scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse intensity and severity.
Change in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity QuestionnaireThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineChange in metabolic equivalent of task (METS) min per week for physical activity per The International Physical Activity Questionnaire reported for 4 groups from baseline to 6 months end of study. Scoring HIGH indicate physical activity levels equate to \ 1hour of activity per day or more at least moderate intensity level or engage in vigorous intensity activity on at least 3 days achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 1500 MET min a week or 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous intensity activities achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 3000 MET min a week. MODERATE suggests engagement equivalent to 30 min of at least moderate intensity activity on most days; engage in 3 or more days of vigorous intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 min per day or 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 minutes per day. LOW level means that neither MODERATE or HIGH levels are met.
Number of Participants With Ulcer RecurrenceThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineNumber of recurrent ulcers that develop during the 6 month study period for in participants for 4 groups of patients with previously healed venous leg ulcers receiving the cooling gel pack and cooling cotton pack and those with previously healed diabetic foot ulcers receiving the cooling gel pack or cooling cotton pack.
Change in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Through study completion at 6 months from baselinePain was measured with a visual analog scale and reported numerically (0 to 10 with 10 being the most severe pain) at baseline and at 6 months end of study
Differences in Step CountsThrough study completion at 6 months from baselineDifferences in step counts reported via accelerometer data, from baseline to post treatment at 6 months end of intervention for the 4 groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessSurvey conducted at end of the 6-month study period.Patients satisfaction was measured by study personnel a during end of study phone survey with the following questions asked as follows (Yes/No): Were study instructions adequate, was thermometer easy to use, found cooling helpful, would cool skin area if it was proven that cooling prevented reulceration; (Easy/Not Easy): completing logs, performing the cooling treatment. Data are for (Yes/No) as number of participants who reported yes or if (Easy/Not Easy) the number of participants who reported easy.
Knowledge Questionnaire of Study InstructionsBaseline after participant enrollmentParticipants were administered a 12-item (yes/no) questionnaire (test) during instruction at the start of the study, provided by the research personnel to determine comprehension of the protocol and to reinforce study procedures. Score of 12 or 100% was given for all items scoring correctly (1 point per item). Any items for which no was answered, remediation was conducted by study personnel at the time the questionnaire was conducted. Means scores are reported per VLU and DFU cooling pack intervention and VLU and DFU cotton cooling pack control.
Participant Adherence to the Study ProtocolDaily measures starting at baseline for temperature and every other day cooling application during the 6-month study period.Using study data logs, appropriate use of the thermometer and cooling pack was measured by the number of participants who adhered to the protocol for taking the temperature of the skin over the healed venous leg or diabetic foot ulcer. Adherence was defined as: the number of participants who were at least 80% adherent to taking their temperatures with the infrared thermometer each morning and the number of participants who were at least 80% adherent to performing the intervention every other day = 3 times times per week during the 6-month study period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Date recruitment period was January 2017 through December 2019 at wound clinics in the South and North Carolina areas including Charleston SC, Spartanburg SC and Greenville NC via clinicians practicing in those clinics and flyers were distributed in and around community settings such as senior centers, prior to approval from MUSC IRB.

Pre-assignment details

246 individuals approached, 211 prescreened eligible, 71 ineligible due to type of wound, could not make regular appointments for study visits, not interested in study, lost contact or developed infection or ulcer changed in size (healed or enlarged indicating deterioration prior to eligibility screening visit); 140 were enrolled - 58 in the DFU group (29 intervention and 29 control)and 82 in VLU group (42 intervention and 40 control)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg Ulcer
A cooling pack was applied to affected leg skin where an ulcer was recently healed for 30 minutes three times a week (preventive maintenance). Participants self monitored skin temperature of affected skin daily to detect elevation and cooled the affected skin daily for 5 consecutive days (bolus) if the skin temperature became elevated 2°F above the baseline. Cooling gel pack: Individuals self monitored temperature of skin over a recently healed venous leg ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cooling gel pack was applied to skin of recently healed venous leg ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increased and stayed elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual cooled the skin 5 consecutive days and continued to monitor skin temperature.
42
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg Ulcer
A cooling cotton pack was applied to affected leg skin where an ulcer was recently healed, for 30 minutes three times a week (preventive maintenance). Patients self monitored temperature of affected skin daily to detect elevation and cooled the affected skin daily for 5 consecutive days (bolus) if the skin temperature became elevated 2°F above the baseline. Cooling cotton pack: Individuals self monitored skin temperature of skin over a recently healed venous leg ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cotton filled pack was applied to skin of recently healed venous leg ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increased and stayed elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual cooled the skin 5 consecutive days and continued to monitor skin temperature.
40
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot Ulcer
A cooling pack was applied to affected foot skin where an ulcer was recently healed for 30 minutes three times a week (preventive maintenance). Participants self monitored skin temperature of affected skin daily to detect elevation and cooled the affected skin daily for 5 consecutive days (bolus) if the skin temperature became elevated 2°F above the baseline. Cooling gel pack: Individuals self monitored temperature of skin over a recently healed diabetic foot ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cooling gel pack was applied to skin of recently healed diabetic foot ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increased and stayed elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual cooled the skin 5 consecutive days and continued to monitor skin temperature.
29
Cooling Cotton Pack - Diabetic Foot Ulcer
A cooling cotton pack was applied to affected foot skin where an ulcer was recently healed, for 30 minutes three times a week (preventive maintenance). Patients self monitored temperature of affected skin daily to detect elevation and cooled the affected skin daily for 5 consecutive days (bolus) if the skin temperature became elevated 2°F above the baseline. Cooling cotton pack: Individuals self monitored skin temperature of skin over a recently healed diabetic foot ulcer with a dermal thermometer. A cotton filled pack was applied to skin of recently healed diabetic foot ulcers for 30 minutes 3 times a week for six months. If the temperature of this skin site increased and stayed elevated 2°F above the usual temperature of that site, the individual cooled the skin 5 consecutive days and continued to monitor skin temperature.
29
Total140

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerTotalCooling Cotton Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerCooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerCooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg Ulcer
Age, Continuous64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants7 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants133 Participants28 Participants26 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants47 Participants5 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants91 Participants24 Participants20 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants140 participants29 participants29 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants54 Participants9 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants86 Participants20 Participants24 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 420 / 400 / 290 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 427 / 4015 / 2910 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 422 / 403 / 294 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym Questionnaire

The Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of life/Symptoms (VEINES QOL/Sym) Questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. A sum score is provided as an overall quality of life score for both the QOL and Sym portions of the questionnaire. This instrument was used only for the VLU groups because it is a disease-specific measure. Of the 26 items in the questionnaire, 25 items are combined to create a summary score (VEINES-QOL). One item which asks about the time of day the leg problem is most intense, question 2, provides only descriptive information and is not scored. A subset (symptoms score) of ten of these items, questions 1a to 1i and 7, is used to create a symptom score (VEINES-Sym). For both the VEINES-QOL and VEINES-Sym scores, high values indicate better outcomes. VEINES-QOL scores can be compared only to other members of the same sample. Each set of VEINES-QOL scores will have a mean T-score = 50.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: Due to inadvertent scoring errors, there were data for 8 individuals.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym QuestionnaireQuality of life13.8 t-scores
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym QuestionnaireSymptoms24.2 t-scores
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym QuestionnaireQuality of life-4.8 t-scores
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Mean Scores on Quality of Life Measured With the VEINES QOL/Sym QuestionnaireSymptoms-4.3 t-scores
Primary

Change in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire

Change in metabolic equivalent of task (METS) min per week for physical activity per The International Physical Activity Questionnaire reported for 4 groups from baseline to 6 months end of study. Scoring HIGH indicate physical activity levels equate to \ 1hour of activity per day or more at least moderate intensity level or engage in vigorous intensity activity on at least 3 days achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 1500 MET min a week or 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous intensity activities achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 3000 MET min a week. MODERATE suggests engagement equivalent to 30 min of at least moderate intensity activity on most days; engage in 3 or more days of vigorous intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 min per day or 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 minutes per day. LOW level means that neither MODERATE or HIGH levels are met.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 82 individuals (59%)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire73 minutes
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire799 minutes
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire1921 minutes
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in METS Minutes Engaging in Physical Activity Measured With The International Physical Activity Questionnaire225 minutes
Primary

Change in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)

Pain was measured with a visual analog scale and reported numerically (0 to 10 with 10 being the most severe pain) at baseline and at 6 months end of study

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 83 individuals (59%)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Pain now0.4 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Least pain0.3 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Worst pain0.85 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Pain now0.14 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Worst pain0.4 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Least pain0 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Worst pain0 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Pain now0.1 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Least pain-0.1 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Least pain0 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Pain now-0.1 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChange in Pain (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Pain Now)Worst pain-1.0 score on a scale
Primary

Changes in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain Inventory

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale is reported as an average score. BPI rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning for intensity and Pain Intensity and Pain Interference. Pain Intensity is measured in four categories: worst, least, on average, and currently, while Pain Interference is measured in 7 categories: mood, work, general activity, walking, relationships, enjoyment of life, and sleep. The patient rates each of these on a scale from 0-10, 10 being excruciating pain intensity and a complete interference in their life. Subscores are determined by averaging over the 4 intensity items for the severity subscore and over the 7 interference items for the interference subscore; possible total scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse intensity and severity.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 83 individuals (59%)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventorySeverity-0.5 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventoryInterference-0.4 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventoryInterference-0.5 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventorySeverity-0.2 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventorySeverity0 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventoryInterference-0.1 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventorySeverity0.4 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerChanges in Severity and Intensity Pain Scores Measured With the Brief Pain InventoryInterference0.1 score on a scale
Primary

Differences in Step Counts

Differences in step counts reported via accelerometer data, from baseline to post treatment at 6 months end of intervention for the 4 groups.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 75 individuals (56%)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerDifferences in Step Counts17295 Steps
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerDifferences in Step Counts14234 Steps
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerDifferences in Step Counts13232 Steps
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerDifferences in Step Counts15479 Steps
Primary

Number of Participants With Ulcer Recurrence

Number of recurrent ulcers that develop during the 6 month study period for in participants for 4 groups of patients with previously healed venous leg ulcers receiving the cooling gel pack and cooling cotton pack and those with previously healed diabetic foot ulcers receiving the cooling gel pack or cooling cotton pack.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized to either the placebo control group (n=57; 34 VLU, 23 DFU) or the intervention (n=60; 35 VLU, 25 DFU), with a final completion of 117 individuals (84%)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants With Ulcer Recurrence6 participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants With Ulcer Recurrence3 participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants With Ulcer Recurrence11 participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants With Ulcer Recurrence5 participants
p-value: 0.09195% CI: [-0.02, 0.3]Chi-squared
Primary

Time Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical Activities

Mean time spent in minutes engaging in physical activities, reported via accelerometer data, from baseline to post treatment at 6 months end of intervention for the 4 groups.

Time frame: Through study completion at 6 months from baseline

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 75 individuals (56%)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerTime Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical Activities1420 Minutes
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerTime Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical Activities2523 Minutes
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerTime Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical Activities135 Minutes
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerTime Spent in Minutes Engaging in Physical Activities157 Minutes
Secondary

Knowledge Questionnaire of Study Instructions

Participants were administered a 12-item (yes/no) questionnaire (test) during instruction at the start of the study, provided by the research personnel to determine comprehension of the protocol and to reinforce study procedures. Score of 12 or 100% was given for all items scoring correctly (1 point per item). Any items for which no was answered, remediation was conducted by study personnel at the time the questionnaire was conducted. Means scores are reported per VLU and DFU cooling pack intervention and VLU and DFU cotton cooling pack control.

Time frame: Baseline after participant enrollment

Population: Of 140 participants, 140 (100%) completed the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerKnowledge Questionnaire of Study Instructions11.7 score on a scale
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerKnowledge Questionnaire of Study Instructions11.9 score on a scale
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerKnowledge Questionnaire of Study Instructions11.8 score on a scale
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerKnowledge Questionnaire of Study Instructions11.9 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, Helpfulness

Patients satisfaction was measured by study personnel a during end of study phone survey with the following questions asked as follows (Yes/No): Were study instructions adequate, was thermometer easy to use, found cooling helpful, would cool skin area if it was proven that cooling prevented reulceration; (Easy/Not Easy): completing logs, performing the cooling treatment. Data are for (Yes/No) as number of participants who reported yes or if (Easy/Not Easy) the number of participants who reported easy.

Time frame: Survey conducted at end of the 6-month study period.

Population: A total of 140 participants were randomized, with a final completion for this outcome of 122 individuals (87%)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCooling Helpful - Yes31 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessWould Cool if Found to Prevent Re-Ulceration - Yes34 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessUsing Thermometer Easy - Yes36 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCompleting Logs - Easy36 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessPerforming Cooling -Treatment - Easy35 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessStudy Instructions Adequate - Yes36 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessUsing Thermometer Easy - Yes32 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessStudy Instructions Adequate - Yes34 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCompleting Logs - Easy33 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCooling Helpful - Yes21 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessWould Cool if Found to Prevent Re-Ulceration - Yes33 count of participants
Cooling Cotton Pack - Venous Leg UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessPerforming Cooling -Treatment - Easy31 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessStudy Instructions Adequate - Yes26 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessUsing Thermometer Easy - Yes27 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCooling Helpful - Yes21 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessPerforming Cooling -Treatment - Easy26 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessWould Cool if Found to Prevent Re-Ulceration - Yes24 count of participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCompleting Logs - Easy27 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessWould Cool if Found to Prevent Re-Ulceration - Yes25 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessStudy Instructions Adequate - Yes25 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessUsing Thermometer Easy - Yes25 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCompleting Logs - Easy25 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessPerforming Cooling -Treatment - Easy24 count of participants
Cotton Cooling Pack - Diabetic Foot UlcerNumber of Participants Indicating 'Yes' or 'Easy' on Study Instructions, Thermometer Use, Completing Logs, Performing Treatment, HelpfulnessCooling Helpful - Yes18 count of participants
Secondary

Participant Adherence to the Study Protocol

Using study data logs, appropriate use of the thermometer and cooling pack was measured by the number of participants who adhered to the protocol for taking the temperature of the skin over the healed venous leg or diabetic foot ulcer. Adherence was defined as: the number of participants who were at least 80% adherent to taking their temperatures with the infrared thermometer each morning and the number of participants who were at least 80% adherent to performing the intervention every other day = 3 times times per week during the 6-month study period.

Time frame: Daily measures starting at baseline for temperature and every other day cooling application during the 6-month study period.

Population: This outcome measured ALL participants in one group, rather than across arms, for adherence to temperature and use of cooling pack.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerParticipant Adherence to the Study ProtocolTemperature106 Participants
Cooling Gel Pack - Venous Leg UlcerParticipant Adherence to the Study ProtocolCooling82 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026