Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetics of GS-4059 (Tirabrutinib) in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Phase 1, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of GS-4059 in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02626026
Enrollment
42
Registered
2015-12-10
Start date
2016-01-26
Completion date
2016-09-01
Last updated
2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will consist of two parts: Part A will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of tirabrutinib in healthy participants. Part B will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and the effect of tirabrutinib on disease-specific clinical markers and outcomes in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Interventions

Capsules administered orally.

DRUGPlacebo

Capsules administered orally.

Sponsors

Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Part A * Be a nonsmoker * Have a calculated body mass index (BMI) from 19 to 30 kg/m\^2, inclusive, at screening * Have a creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 90 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault method based on serum creatinine and actual body weight as measured at screening * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and clinic admission. * Male and female individuals of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception * Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be in good health based upon medical history and physical examination, including vital signs * Screening laboratory evaluations (hematology including reticulocytes, fasting lipids, chemistry, and urinalysis) must fall within the normal range of the local laboratory's reference ranges unless the results have been determined by the investigator to have no clinical significance * Have either a normal 12-lead ECG or one with abnormalities that are considered clinically insignificant by the investigator in consultation with the Sponsor Part B * Diagnosis of RA (according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria OR a score of ≥ 6 as defined by the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism Classification and Diagnostic Criteria for RA) * Individuals must have taken methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 to 25 mg/week continuously for at least 12 weeks, with at least 6 weeks of stable dose prior to first study drug dose and throughout study duration. * Individuals must be receiving folic or folinic acid supplementation at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to Day 1 dosing and throughout study duration * Individuals are allowed to remain on anti-malarial therapy, with at least 8 weeks of stable dose prior to first study drug dose * Use of oral corticosteroids of no more than 10 mg prednisone or its equivalent per day is allowed if dose is stable for at least 28 days prior to first study drug dose * Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics (including aspirin ≤ 100 mg daily) are allowed if doses are stable for at least 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug * Estimated creatinine clearance (CLCr) ≥ 60 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault method) based on serum creatinine and actual body weight as measured at the screening evaluation * White blood cells (WBC), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and platelet count ≥ 0.75 x lower limit of normal (LLN) * A negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative pregnancy test on the Day 1 visit prior to the first dose of study drug for female individual of child bearing potential. * Male and female individuals of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception

Exclusion criteria

Part A * Pregnant or lactating individuals * Have any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness (including depression) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with individual's treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. This would include renal, cardiac, hematological, hepatic, pulmonary (including chronic asthma), endocrine (including diabetes), central nervous, gastrointestinal (including an ulcer), vascular, metabolic (thyroid disorders, adrenal disease), immunodeficiency disorders, active infection, or malignancy that are clinically significant or requiring treatment * Positive test for drugs of abuse, including alcohol at screening or on Day -1/check-in * A positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) antibody, hepatitis B (HBV) surface antigen or hepatitis C (HCV) antibody * Have poor venous access that limits phlebotomy * Have taken any prescription medications or over-the-counter medications, including herbal products, within 28 days prior to start of study drug dosing, with the exception of vitamins and/or acetaminophen and/or hormonal contraceptive medications * Have been treated with systemic steroids, immunosuppressant therapies, or chemotherapeutic agents within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to receive these agents during the study (eg, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, and other immune- or cytokine-based therapies) * Significant drug sensitivity or drug allergy (such as anaphylaxis or hepatoxicity) * Medical or surgical treatment that permanently alters gastric absorption (eg, gastric or intestinal surgery); a history of cholecystectomy is not exclusionary Part B * Known hypersensitivity to formulation excipient. * Pregnant or lactating females * Previous treatment with B-cell depleting agents (eg, rituximab) within 12 months of treatment * Prior treatment with any commercially available or investigational Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor * Diagnosis of diabetes, history of impaired glucose tolerance test, history of abnormal glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), or history of impaired fasting glucose * Current treatment with any other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) other than MTX and hydroxychloroquine, unless appropriate wash out * Current treatment with any biologic agent, unless appropriate wash out * Any laboratory abnormality or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the individual or impair the assessment of study results * History of or current inflammatory joint disease, other than RA * Active significant systemic involvement secondary to RA such as vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis or Felty's syndrome * History of or current autoimmune or rheumatic disorders, other than RA * RA functional class 4 or other uncontrolled medical conditions * History of ongoing, chronic or recurrent infections or recent serious or life-threatening infection * Presence of any condition that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the individual's ability to participate in the study, such as history of substance abuse, alcoholism, or a psychiatric condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 daysAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.
Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFirst dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 daysA treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.
Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesFirst dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days
Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdoseCmax is maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma.
Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdoseClast is the last observed concentration of drug in plasma.
Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdoseTmax is the time observed for the Cmax of tirabrutinib.
Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdoseTlast is the time observed for the Clast of tirabrutinib.
Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose relative to the morning doseAUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).
Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of TirabrutinibCohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdoseAUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEsFirst dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 daysAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.
Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFirst dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 daysA treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per CTCAE, version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.
Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG AbnormalitiesFirst dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity\]; patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain\]; HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 \[0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do\]; hsCRP.
Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Hybrid ACR evaluates the improvement in active RA by combining elements of the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 with a continuous score of the mean change in core set measures. The percentage improvement from baseline was computed in each of the components of the ACR. The average percent improvement was calculated and used with the participant's ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 status to compute the hybrid ACR response, with a positive change indicating improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Clinical remission is defined as DAS28-CRP \< 2.6. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Low disease activity is defined as DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Days 1 and 7: Predose and 2, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdoseThe effect of tirabrutinib on biomarkers was assessed through the CD63 basophil activation test (BAT) FlowCast assay, which was used to measure the percentage of CD63+ basophils and percentage inhibition of CD63 induction relative to baseline. CD63+ % inhibition was calculated as 100 - CD63+ % baseline. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Low disease activity is defined as CDAI ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Clinical remission is defined as SDAI ≤ 3.3. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Low disease activity is defined as SDAI ≤ 11. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 2.8. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose; Day 7: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120 hours postdoseBTK occupancy was assessed with the BTK occupancy assay, which was used to measure undetectable free BTK, normalized free BTK, normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline, and percentage BTK occupancy adjusted to baseline. % BTK occupancy adjusted was calculated as 100 \* (1 - normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline). Normalized free BTK was calculated as Free BTK / Total BTK. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) calculated using the tender joint counts (TJC) (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analog scale: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4ACR TJC was an assessment of 68 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was tender where presence of tenderness was scored as 1 and the absence of tenderness was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all tender joints. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment WeekACR SJC was an assessment of 66 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as 1 and the absence of swelling was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC based on 28 joints (TJC28), SJC based on 28 joints (SJC28), PtGA, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA), and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4PtGA was assessed by the participant using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to provide the patient's overall assessment of how the arthritis is doing. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the current arthritis disease activity. The lowest mark indicated 'no arthritis activity', and the highest mark indicated 'extremely active arthritis'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4PhGA was assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to measure the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the disease activity (independent of the participant's self-assessment). The lowest mark indicated 'no disease activity', and the highest mark indicated 'maximum disease activity'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4The participant assessed their pain severity using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's current level of pain. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the severity of pain. The lowest mark indicated 'no pain', and the highest mark indicated 'unbearable pain'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually administered by the participant. Responses in each functional category were collected as 0-3 \[0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity); patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain); HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do); high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 11 study sites in the United States. The first participant was screened on 26 January 2016. The last study visit occurred on 01 September 2016.

Pre-assignment details

58 participants were screened and 42 participants were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD
Tirabrutinib 20 mg capsules orally once daily (QD) in the morning for 1 week.
8
Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo
Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally QD in the morning for 1 week.
2
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID
Tirabrutinib 10 mg capsules orally twice daily (BID) (morning and approximately 12 hours later) for 7 days. On Day 7, only morning dose was administered.
8
Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo
Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally BID (morning and approximately 12 hours later) for 7 days. On Day 7, only morning dose was administered.
2
Part B: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD
Tirabrutinib 20 mg capsules orally QD for 4 weeks.
16
Part B: Placebo
Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally QD for 4 weeks.
5
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyRandomized but Never Treated000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1, Part A: PlaceboCohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDCohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDCohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous37 years38 years34 years38 years55 years52 years45.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants8 Participants8 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants14 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants1 Participants16 Participants5 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants13 Participants4 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 80 / 160 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 83 / 86 / 163 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 160 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib

AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 1228.3 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 89.96
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 7377.8 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 119.8
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 1107.1 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.54
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 7245.5 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 65.02
Primary

Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib

AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose relative to the morning dose

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib360.5 hours*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 97.49
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib195.2 hours*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 44.43
Primary

Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib

Clast is the last observed concentration of drug in plasma.

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 12.58 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.366
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 71.50 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.551
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 15.22 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.729
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 72.03 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.756
Primary

Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib

Cmax is maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma.

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose

Population: The Pharmacokinetics (PK) Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of tirabrutinib and had at least 1 non-missing PK concentration data reported by the PK lab for each respective analyte.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 133.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.94
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 756.4 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11.19
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 116.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4.66
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of TirabrutinibDay 732.3 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 8.59
Primary

Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities

A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAmylase12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Cholesterol Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphorus Decreased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphorus Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Decreased50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Cholesterol Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAmylase0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides Increased37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAmylase0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphorus Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Cholesterol Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAmylase0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphorus Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Cholesterol Increased100.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides Increased50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib

Tlast is the time observed for the Clast of tirabrutinib.

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of TirabrutinibDay 730.00 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of TirabrutinibDay 123.92 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of TirabrutinibDay 111.92 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of TirabrutinibDay 724.00 hours
Primary

Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib

Tmax is the time observed for the Cmax of tirabrutinib.

Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of TirabrutinibDay 12.00 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of TirabrutinibDay 72.00 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of TirabrutinibDay 13.00 hours
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of TirabrutinibDay 72.00 hours
Primary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs40.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities0 percentage of participants
Primary

Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities

A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per CTCAE, version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased18.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFasting Glucose Increased20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesMagnesium Increased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells Decreased0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose Increased20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7

BTK occupancy was assessed with the BTK occupancy assay, which was used to measure undetectable free BTK, normalized free BTK, normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline, and percentage BTK occupancy adjusted to baseline. % BTK occupancy adjusted was calculated as 100 \* (1 - normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline). Normalized free BTK was calculated as Free BTK / Total BTK. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.

Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose; Day 7: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120 hours postdose

Population: Participants in the Biomarker Analysis Set were analyzed. All of the baseline samples collected for BTK occupancy assay in Part A Cohort 2 were compromised and therefore not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose55.250 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 10.023
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 0.5 Hour Postdose-2.765 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 14.6036
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 1 Hour Postdose11.635 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 17.8025
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 3 Hours Postdose62.719 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 7.706
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 4 Hours Postdose66.790 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 7.9494
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose71.936 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.3606
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose77.411 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.6928
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 18 Hours Postdose81.187 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.8687
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose72.691 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 10.8289
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose84.010 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.4919
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose90.606 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.1066
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose70.841 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 43.0596
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose93.128 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 4.0582
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose86.936 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.4745
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 0.5 Hours Postdose87.013 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 5.2426
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 1 Hour Postdose86.274 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.072
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose92.651 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 3.4603
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 3 Hours Postdose92.983 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 2.1906
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 4 Hours Postdose90.070 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 7.4086
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose91.251 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.03
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 18 Hours Postdose85.209 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 5.0694
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose86.256 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.5648
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 96 Hours Postdose24.922 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.87
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 120 Hours Postdose15.285 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 9.414
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 8 Hours Postdose75.350 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 11.5216
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose91.591 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 7.7733
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 8 Hours Postdose92.789 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 3.2221
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 36 Hours Postdose71.963 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 10.555
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 48 Hours Postdose64.763 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 14.3072
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 60 Hours Postdose57.431 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 9.0638
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 72 Hours Postdose46.218 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 14.3155
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 96 Hours Postdose-41.721 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 32.0255
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose-34.573 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 17.962
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 0.5 Hour Postdose-4.686 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 1.8358
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 8 Hours Postdose-16.584 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 17.8202
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 1 Hour Postdose-11.927 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.4893
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose-8.959 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 16.7122
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 3 Hours Postdose-32.920 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 20.1029
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 3 Hours Postdose-9.810 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 18.8212
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 0.5 Hours Postdose-23.284 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 9.9539
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 4 Hours Postdose-16.597 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 25.0492
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 8 Hours Postdose-31.144 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 20.1974
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose-6.014 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 19.5348
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 4 Hours Postdose-37.253 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 16.2208
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose6.170 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 12.7312
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose-33.947 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 16.3475
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 18 Hours Postdose-2.261 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 27.3338
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 48 Hours Postdose-46.249 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 24.2785
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose-28.029 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 10.1821
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 18 Hours Postdose-34.408 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 12.5471
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose-19.564 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 20.3282
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose-39.632 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 13.1749
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose-35.206 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 25.2258
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose-42.577 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 17.2138
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose25.095 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 99.0827
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 72 Hours Postdose-49.093 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 21.4447
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose-25.646 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 17.6912
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 60 Hours Postdose-15.465 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 9.4556
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose-22.662 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 23.6252
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 120 Hours Postdose-48.863 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 20.7533
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 36 Hours Postdose-43.574 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 8.4952
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 1 Hour Postdose-12.230 percentage of BTK occupancyStandard Deviation 6.6727
Secondary

Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7

The effect of tirabrutinib on biomarkers was assessed through the CD63 basophil activation test (BAT) FlowCast assay, which was used to measure the percentage of CD63+ basophils and percentage inhibition of CD63 induction relative to baseline. CD63+ % inhibition was calculated as 100 - CD63+ % baseline. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7: Predose and 2, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose

Population: The Biomarker Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and for whom biomarker data were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose55.680 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 21.5018
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose79.910 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 15.3155
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose80.271 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 16.8806
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose56.986 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 20.3972
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose34.966 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 15.6436
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose52.017 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 17.5829
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose17.189 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 6.8306
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose33.305 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 14.9248
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose47.416 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 17.047
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose88.102 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 11.6072
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose73.972 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 15.1658
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose2.779 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 3.7023
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose-0.046 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0.6432
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose-1.320 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 8.1776
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose-2.831 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0.7358
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose-0.043 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 2.3069
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose5.234 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0.8757
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose5.604 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 1.2275
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose-0.842 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 4.6395
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose8.779 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 9.9101
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose0.917 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 11.4281
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose0.272 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 2.3326
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose91.159 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 7.474
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose19.557 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 11.0479
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose27.506 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 16.0744
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose35.008 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 24.1663
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose83.832 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 10.1042
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose90.187 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 5.6699
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose83.380 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 10.3976
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose80.024 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 11.0371
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose88.032 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 7.875
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose89.681 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 7.0909
Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BIDPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose80.640 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 10.0574
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose-13.641 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 13.0667
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose1.782 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 6.3117
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose-0.978 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 9.938
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 3, Predose-11.354 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 16.5029
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose-2.688 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 16.7688
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose3.568 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 1.4734
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose-2.645 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 6.3382
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 1, Predose0 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose-15.923 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 11.5733
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose-10.062 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 13.2554
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 7, Predose6.271 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 7.979
Cohort 2, Part A: PlaceboPart A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7Day 5, Predose-2.271 percentage of InhibitionStandard Deviation 0.206
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline29.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.994
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-4.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.748
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-6.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.925
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-4.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.18
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-1.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.562
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline31.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.622
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.206
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-5.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.264
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) calculated using the tender joint counts (TJC) (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analog scale: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (who were randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug) with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline4.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.728
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.821
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.097
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.208
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.782
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline5.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.576
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.612
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.977
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

PtGA was assessed by the participant using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to provide the patient's overall assessment of how the arthritis is doing. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the current arthritis disease activity. The lowest mark indicated 'no arthritis activity', and the highest mark indicated 'extremely active arthritis'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.5
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

The participant assessed their pain severity using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's current level of pain. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the severity of pain. The lowest mark indicated 'no pain', and the highest mark indicated 'unbearable pain'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.2
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

PhGA was assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to measure the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the disease activity (independent of the participant's self-assessment). The lowest mark indicated 'no disease activity', and the highest mark indicated 'maximum disease activity'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

ACR SJC was an assessment of 66 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as 1 and the absence of swelling was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline12.70 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 10.944
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-4.13 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 6.446
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-4.82 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7.586
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-3.07 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 5.272
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 41.53 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.035
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline12.04 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 12.488
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-2.23 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 6.048
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-2.58 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 9.91
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

ACR TJC was an assessment of 68 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was tender where presence of tenderness was scored as 1 and the absence of tenderness was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all tender joints. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline18.20 tender joint countStandard Deviation 14.454
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Week 2-2.57 tender joint countStandard Deviation 6.666
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Week 4-6.69 tender joint countStandard Deviation 8.432
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Posttreatment Week 4-3.13 tender joint countStandard Deviation 9.968
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Posttreatment Week 41.11 tender joint countStandard Deviation 12.638
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline21.70 tender joint countStandard Deviation 12.656
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Week 40.01 tender joint countStandard Deviation 0.829
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baselline at Week 2-1.17 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.98
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC based on 28 joints (TJC28), SJC based on 28 joints (SJC28), PtGA, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA), and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline30.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.283
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-4.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.786
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-6.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.016
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-4.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.349
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-1.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.293
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline33.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.061
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-1.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.439
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-5.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.035
Secondary

Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually administered by the participant. Responses in each functional category were collected as 0-3 \[0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline1.063 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.713
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.203 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5242
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.234 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4492
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4-0.156 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.355
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 40.094 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1197
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Baseline1.650 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7776
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3687
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.150 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2054
Secondary

Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Hybrid ACR evaluates the improvement in active RA by combining elements of the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 with a continuous score of the mean change in core set measures. The percentage improvement from baseline was computed in each of the components of the ACR. The average percent improvement was calculated and used with the participant's ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 status to compute the hybrid ACR response, with a positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 21.51 percent improvementStandard Deviation 30.687
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 43.29 percent improvementStandard Deviation 36.098
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Posttreatment Week 40.44 percent improvementStandard Deviation 34.589
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 24.41 percent improvementStandard Deviation 25.41
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 4-4.06 percent improvementStandard Deviation 14.459
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Posttreatment Week 4-7.65 percent improvementStandard Deviation 20.606
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity\]; patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain\]; HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 \[0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do\]; hsCRP.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 20 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 46.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Posttreatment Week 40 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 20 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Week 40 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4At Posttreatment Week 40 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity); patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain); HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do); high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP).

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 418.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 26.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Posttreatment Week 412.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 40 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Posttreatment Week 40 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 220.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Low disease activity is defined as CDAI ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10)18.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10)18.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on CDAI (<= 10)31.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on CDAI (<= 10)20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Low disease activity is defined as DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2)18.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2)12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week4: Low Disease Activity DAS28-CRP (<=3.2)37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week4: Low Disease Activity DAS28-CRP (<=3.2)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Low disease activity is defined as SDAI ≤ 11. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11)25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11)18.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on SDAI (<= 11)37.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11)20.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on SDAI (<= 11)20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 2.8. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Clinical remission is defined as DAS28-CRP \< 2.6. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Clinical remission is defined as SDAI ≤ 3.3. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)12.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QDPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)6.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 2: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Part A: PlaceboPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4Post Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3)0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026