Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will consist of two parts: Part A will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of tirabrutinib in healthy participants. Part B will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and the effect of tirabrutinib on disease-specific clinical markers and outcomes in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Interventions
Capsules administered orally.
Capsules administered orally.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Part A * Be a nonsmoker * Have a calculated body mass index (BMI) from 19 to 30 kg/m\^2, inclusive, at screening * Have a creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 90 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault method based on serum creatinine and actual body weight as measured at screening * Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and clinic admission. * Male and female individuals of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception * Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be in good health based upon medical history and physical examination, including vital signs * Screening laboratory evaluations (hematology including reticulocytes, fasting lipids, chemistry, and urinalysis) must fall within the normal range of the local laboratory's reference ranges unless the results have been determined by the investigator to have no clinical significance * Have either a normal 12-lead ECG or one with abnormalities that are considered clinically insignificant by the investigator in consultation with the Sponsor Part B * Diagnosis of RA (according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria OR a score of ≥ 6 as defined by the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism Classification and Diagnostic Criteria for RA) * Individuals must have taken methotrexate (MTX) 7.5 to 25 mg/week continuously for at least 12 weeks, with at least 6 weeks of stable dose prior to first study drug dose and throughout study duration. * Individuals must be receiving folic or folinic acid supplementation at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to Day 1 dosing and throughout study duration * Individuals are allowed to remain on anti-malarial therapy, with at least 8 weeks of stable dose prior to first study drug dose * Use of oral corticosteroids of no more than 10 mg prednisone or its equivalent per day is allowed if dose is stable for at least 28 days prior to first study drug dose * Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other analgesics (including aspirin ≤ 100 mg daily) are allowed if doses are stable for at least 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug * Estimated creatinine clearance (CLCr) ≥ 60 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault method) based on serum creatinine and actual body weight as measured at the screening evaluation * White blood cells (WBC), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and platelet count ≥ 0.75 x lower limit of normal (LLN) * A negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative pregnancy test on the Day 1 visit prior to the first dose of study drug for female individual of child bearing potential. * Male and female individuals of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception
Exclusion criteria
Part A * Pregnant or lactating individuals * Have any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness (including depression) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with individual's treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. This would include renal, cardiac, hematological, hepatic, pulmonary (including chronic asthma), endocrine (including diabetes), central nervous, gastrointestinal (including an ulcer), vascular, metabolic (thyroid disorders, adrenal disease), immunodeficiency disorders, active infection, or malignancy that are clinically significant or requiring treatment * Positive test for drugs of abuse, including alcohol at screening or on Day -1/check-in * A positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) antibody, hepatitis B (HBV) surface antigen or hepatitis C (HCV) antibody * Have poor venous access that limits phlebotomy * Have taken any prescription medications or over-the-counter medications, including herbal products, within 28 days prior to start of study drug dosing, with the exception of vitamins and/or acetaminophen and/or hormonal contraceptive medications * Have been treated with systemic steroids, immunosuppressant therapies, or chemotherapeutic agents within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to receive these agents during the study (eg, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, and other immune- or cytokine-based therapies) * Significant drug sensitivity or drug allergy (such as anaphylaxis or hepatoxicity) * Medical or surgical treatment that permanently alters gastric absorption (eg, gastric or intestinal surgery); a history of cholecystectomy is not exclusionary Part B * Known hypersensitivity to formulation excipient. * Pregnant or lactating females * Previous treatment with B-cell depleting agents (eg, rituximab) within 12 months of treatment * Prior treatment with any commercially available or investigational Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor * Diagnosis of diabetes, history of impaired glucose tolerance test, history of abnormal glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), or history of impaired fasting glucose * Current treatment with any other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) other than MTX and hydroxychloroquine, unless appropriate wash out * Current treatment with any biologic agent, unless appropriate wash out * Any laboratory abnormality or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the individual or impair the assessment of study results * History of or current inflammatory joint disease, other than RA * Active significant systemic involvement secondary to RA such as vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis or Felty's syndrome * History of or current autoimmune or rheumatic disorders, other than RA * RA functional class 4 or other uncontrolled medical conditions * History of ongoing, chronic or recurrent infections or recent serious or life-threatening infection * Presence of any condition that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the individual's ability to participate in the study, such as history of substance abuse, alcoholism, or a psychiatric condition
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug. |
| Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days | A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening. |
| Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days | — |
| Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose | Cmax is maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma. |
| Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose | Clast is the last observed concentration of drug in plasma. |
| Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose | Tmax is the time observed for the Cmax of tirabrutinib. |
| Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose | Tlast is the time observed for the Clast of tirabrutinib. |
| Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose relative to the morning dose | AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve). |
| Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose | AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve). |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days | A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per CTCAE, version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities | First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity\]; patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain\]; HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 \[0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do\]; hsCRP. |
| Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Hybrid ACR evaluates the improvement in active RA by combining elements of the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 with a continuous score of the mean change in core set measures. The percentage improvement from baseline was computed in each of the components of the ACR. The average percent improvement was calculated and used with the participant's ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 status to compute the hybrid ACR response, with a positive change indicating improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Clinical remission is defined as DAS28-CRP \< 2.6. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Low disease activity is defined as DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Days 1 and 7: Predose and 2, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose | The effect of tirabrutinib on biomarkers was assessed through the CD63 basophil activation test (BAT) FlowCast assay, which was used to measure the percentage of CD63+ basophils and percentage inhibition of CD63 induction relative to baseline. CD63+ % inhibition was calculated as 100 - CD63+ % baseline. Baseline defined as day 1 predose. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Low disease activity is defined as CDAI ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Clinical remission is defined as SDAI ≤ 3.3. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Low disease activity is defined as SDAI ≤ 11. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 2.8. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose; Day 7: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120 hours postdose | BTK occupancy was assessed with the BTK occupancy assay, which was used to measure undetectable free BTK, normalized free BTK, normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline, and percentage BTK occupancy adjusted to baseline. % BTK occupancy adjusted was calculated as 100 \* (1 - normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline). Normalized free BTK was calculated as Free BTK / Total BTK. Baseline defined as day 1 predose. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) calculated using the tender joint counts (TJC) (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analog scale: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | ACR TJC was an assessment of 68 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was tender where presence of tenderness was scored as 1 and the absence of tenderness was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all tender joints. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week | ACR SJC was an assessment of 66 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as 1 and the absence of swelling was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC based on 28 joints (TJC28), SJC based on 28 joints (SJC28), PtGA, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA), and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | PtGA was assessed by the participant using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to provide the patient's overall assessment of how the arthritis is doing. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the current arthritis disease activity. The lowest mark indicated 'no arthritis activity', and the highest mark indicated 'extremely active arthritis'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | PhGA was assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to measure the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the disease activity (independent of the participant's self-assessment). The lowest mark indicated 'no disease activity', and the highest mark indicated 'maximum disease activity'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | The participant assessed their pain severity using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's current level of pain. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the severity of pain. The lowest mark indicated 'no pain', and the highest mark indicated 'unbearable pain'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually administered by the participant. Responses in each functional category were collected as 0-3 \[0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity); patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain); HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do); high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled at 11 study sites in the United States. The first participant was screened on 26 January 2016. The last study visit occurred on 01 September 2016.
Pre-assignment details
58 participants were screened and 42 participants were enrolled.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD Tirabrutinib 20 mg capsules orally once daily (QD) in the morning for 1 week. | 8 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally QD in the morning for 1 week. | 2 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID Tirabrutinib 10 mg capsules orally twice daily (BID) (morning and approximately 12 hours later) for 7 days. On Day 7, only morning dose was administered. | 8 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally BID (morning and approximately 12 hours later) for 7 days. On Day 7, only morning dose was administered. | 2 |
| Part B: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD Tirabrutinib 20 mg capsules orally QD for 4 weeks. | 16 |
| Part B: Placebo Placebo to match tirabrutinib capsules orally QD for 4 weeks. | 5 |
| Total | 41 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Randomized but Never Treated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37 years | 38 years | 34 years | 38 years | 55 years | 52 years | 45.5 years |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 1 Participants | 16 Participants | 5 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 13 Participants | 4 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 16 | 0 / 9 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 8 | 3 / 8 | 6 / 16 | 3 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 16 | 0 / 9 |
Outcome results
Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib
AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose
Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 228.3 h*ng/mL | Standard Deviation 89.96 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 377.8 h*ng/mL | Standard Deviation 119.8 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 107.1 h*ng/mL | Standard Deviation 27.54 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: AUClast: AUC Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 245.5 h*ng/mL | Standard Deviation 65.02 |
Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib
AUC is concentration of drug over time (area under the plasma concentration versus time curve).
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose relative to the morning dose
Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib | 360.5 hours*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 97.49 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: AUCtau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUC) Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval of Tirabrutinib | 195.2 hours*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 44.43 |
Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib
Clast is the last observed concentration of drug in plasma.
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose
Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 2.58 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 1.366 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 1.50 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 0.551 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 5.22 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 1.729 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Clast: Last Observed Quantifiable Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 2.03 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 0.756 |
Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib
Cmax is maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma.
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose
Population: The Pharmacokinetics (PK) Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of tirabrutinib and had at least 1 non-missing PK concentration data reported by the PK lab for each respective analyte.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 33.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 56.4 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 11.19 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 16.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 4.66 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 32.3 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 8.59 |
Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days
Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0 percentage of participants |
Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days
Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities
A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 7 days) plus 30 days
Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Calcium Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Amylase | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Triglycerides Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Total Cholesterol Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Sodium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Phosphorus Decreased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Calcium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Phosphorus Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Sodium Decreased | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Total Cholesterol Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Amylase | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Triglycerides Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Triglycerides Increased | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Amylase | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Sodium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Calcium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Phosphorus Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Total Cholesterol Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Amylase | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Phosphorus Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Sodium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Total Cholesterol Increased | 100.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Triglycerides Increased | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Calcium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib
Tlast is the time observed for the Clast of tirabrutinib.
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose
Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 30.00 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 23.92 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 11.92 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Tlast: Time (Observed Time Point) of Clast of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 24.00 hours |
Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib
Tmax is the time observed for the Cmax of tirabrutinib.
Time frame: Cohorts 1 and 2, Day 1: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postdose; Day 7: 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 hours postdose
Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 2.00 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 2.00 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib | Day 1 | 3.00 hours |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Tmax: Time (Observed Time Point) of Cmax of Tirabrutinib | Day 7 | 2.00 hours |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and/or unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of the following: Any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study drug and/or Any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days
Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced TEAEs | 40.0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days
Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With 12-Lead ECG Abnormalities | 0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities
A treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality was defined as an increase of at least 1 abnormality grade from the predose assessment after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days after last study drug administration. Laboratory abnormalities without clinical significance were not recorded as AEs or serious AEs. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded per CTCAE, version 4.03 where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = potentially life threatening.
Time frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum: 29 days) plus 30 days
Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Potassium Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Hemoglobin Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Fasting Glucose Increased | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Neutrophils Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Magnesium Increased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | White Blood Cells Decreased | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Glucose Increased | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Increased | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7
BTK occupancy was assessed with the BTK occupancy assay, which was used to measure undetectable free BTK, normalized free BTK, normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline, and percentage BTK occupancy adjusted to baseline. % BTK occupancy adjusted was calculated as 100 \* (1 - normalized free BTK adjusted to baseline). Normalized free BTK was calculated as Free BTK / Total BTK. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.
Time frame: Day 1: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose; Day 7: Predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120 hours postdose
Population: Participants in the Biomarker Analysis Set were analyzed. All of the baseline samples collected for BTK occupancy assay in Part A Cohort 2 were compromised and therefore not evaluable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | 55.250 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 10.023 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 0.5 Hour Postdose | -2.765 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 14.6036 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 1 Hour Postdose | 11.635 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 17.8025 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 3 Hours Postdose | 62.719 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 7.706 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 4 Hours Postdose | 66.790 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 7.9494 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | 71.936 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.3606 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose | 77.411 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.6928 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 18 Hours Postdose | 81.187 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.8687 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose | 72.691 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 10.8289 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | 84.010 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.4919 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | 90.606 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.1066 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | 70.841 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 43.0596 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | 93.128 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 4.0582 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | 86.936 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.4745 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 0.5 Hours Postdose | 87.013 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 5.2426 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 1 Hour Postdose | 86.274 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.072 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | 92.651 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 3.4603 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 3 Hours Postdose | 92.983 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 2.1906 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 4 Hours Postdose | 90.070 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 7.4086 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose | 91.251 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.03 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 18 Hours Postdose | 85.209 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 5.0694 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose | 86.256 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.5648 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 96 Hours Postdose | 24.922 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.87 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 120 Hours Postdose | 15.285 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 9.414 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 8 Hours Postdose | 75.350 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 11.5216 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | 91.591 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 7.7733 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 8 Hours Postdose | 92.789 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 3.2221 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 36 Hours Postdose | 71.963 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 10.555 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 48 Hours Postdose | 64.763 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 14.3072 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 60 Hours Postdose | 57.431 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 9.0638 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 72 Hours Postdose | 46.218 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 14.3155 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 96 Hours Postdose | -41.721 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 32.0255 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | -34.573 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 17.962 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 0.5 Hour Postdose | -4.686 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 1.8358 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 8 Hours Postdose | -16.584 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 17.8202 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 1 Hour Postdose | -11.927 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.4893 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | -8.959 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 16.7122 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 3 Hours Postdose | -32.920 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 20.1029 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 3 Hours Postdose | -9.810 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 18.8212 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 0.5 Hours Postdose | -23.284 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 9.9539 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 4 Hours Postdose | -16.597 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 25.0492 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 8 Hours Postdose | -31.144 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 20.1974 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | -6.014 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 19.5348 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 4 Hours Postdose | -37.253 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 16.2208 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose | 6.170 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 12.7312 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose | -33.947 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 16.3475 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 18 Hours Postdose | -2.261 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 27.3338 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 48 Hours Postdose | -46.249 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 24.2785 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose | -28.029 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 10.1821 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 18 Hours Postdose | -34.408 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 12.5471 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | -19.564 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 20.3282 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | -39.632 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 13.1749 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | -35.206 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 25.2258 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose | -42.577 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 17.2138 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | 25.095 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 99.0827 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 72 Hours Postdose | -49.093 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 21.4447 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | -25.646 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 17.6912 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 60 Hours Postdose | -15.465 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 9.4556 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | -22.662 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 23.6252 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 120 Hours Postdose | -48.863 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 20.7533 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 36 Hours Postdose | -43.574 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 8.4952 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 1 Hour Postdose | -12.230 percentage of BTK occupancy | Standard Deviation 6.6727 |
Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7
The effect of tirabrutinib on biomarkers was assessed through the CD63 basophil activation test (BAT) FlowCast assay, which was used to measure the percentage of CD63+ basophils and percentage inhibition of CD63 induction relative to baseline. CD63+ % inhibition was calculated as 100 - CD63+ % baseline. Baseline defined as day 1 predose.
Time frame: Days 1 and 7: Predose and 2, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose; Days 3 and 5: Predose and 2 hours postdose
Population: The Biomarker Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and for whom biomarker data were available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | 55.680 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 21.5018 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | 79.910 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 15.3155 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | 80.271 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 16.8806 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | 56.986 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 20.3972 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | 34.966 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 15.6436 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose | 52.017 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 17.5829 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | 17.189 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 6.8306 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose | 33.305 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 14.9248 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | 47.416 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 17.047 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | 88.102 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 11.6072 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | 73.972 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 15.1658 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | 2.779 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 3.7023 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 24 Hours Postdose | -0.046 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0.6432 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | -1.320 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 8.1776 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | -2.831 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0.7358 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | -0.043 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 2.3069 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | 5.234 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0.8757 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 24 Hours Postdose | 5.604 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 1.2275 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | -0.842 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 4.6395 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | 8.779 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 9.9101 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | 0.917 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 11.4281 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | 0.272 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 2.3326 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | 91.159 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 7.474 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | 19.557 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 11.0479 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | 27.506 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 16.0744 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose | 35.008 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 24.1663 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | 83.832 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 10.1042 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | 90.187 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 5.6699 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | 83.380 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 10.3976 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | 80.024 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 11.0371 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | 88.032 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 7.875 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | 89.681 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 7.0909 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Tirabrutinib 10 mg BID | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose | 80.640 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 10.0574 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, 2 Hours Postdose | -13.641 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 13.0667 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 6 Hours Postdose | 1.782 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 6.3117 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 2 Hours Postdose | -0.978 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 9.938 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 3, Predose | -11.354 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 16.5029 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 12 Hours Postdose | -2.688 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 16.7688 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, 2 Hours Postdose | 3.568 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 1.4734 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 6 Hours Postdose | -2.645 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 6.3382 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 1, Predose | 0 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, 2 Hours Postdose | -15.923 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 11.5733 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, 12 Hours Postdose | -10.062 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 13.2554 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 7, Predose | 6.271 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 7.979 |
| Cohort 2, Part A: Placebo | Part A: Change From Baseline in Percent Inhibition of CD63 Basophils at Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 | Day 5, Predose | -2.271 percentage of Inhibition | Standard Deviation 0.206 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 29.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.994 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -4.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.748 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -6.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.925 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -4.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.18 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -1.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.562 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 31.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.622 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -2.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.206 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -5.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.264 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) calculated using the tender joint counts (TJC) (28 joints), swollen joint counts (28 joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analog scale: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (who were randomized into the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug) with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 4.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.728 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -0.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.821 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -0.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.097 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -0.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.208 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -0.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.782 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 5.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.576 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -0.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.612 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) Using C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -0.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.977 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
PtGA was assessed by the participant using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to provide the patient's overall assessment of how the arthritis is doing. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the current arthritis disease activity. The lowest mark indicated 'no arthritis activity', and the highest mark indicated 'extremely active arthritis'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.5 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
The participant assessed their pain severity using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to assess the patient's current level of pain. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the severity of pain. The lowest mark indicated 'no pain', and the highest mark indicated 'unbearable pain'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.6 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.2 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.9 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
PhGA was assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A horizontal visual analog scale was used to measure the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity. A mark was placed on the horizontal line to assess the disease activity (independent of the participant's self-assessment). The lowest mark indicated 'no disease activity', and the highest mark indicated 'maximum disease activity'. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | 5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.9 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
ACR SJC was an assessment of 66 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as 1 and the absence of swelling was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 12.70 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 10.944 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -4.13 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 6.446 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -4.82 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 7.586 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -3.07 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 5.272 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | 1.53 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 3.035 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 12.04 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 12.488 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -2.23 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 6.048 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -2.58 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 9.91 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
ACR TJC was an assessment of 68 joints. At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was tender where presence of tenderness was scored as 1 and the absence of tenderness was scored as 0, provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. It was derived as the sum of all tender joints. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 18.20 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 14.454 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Week 2 | -2.57 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 6.666 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Week 4 | -6.69 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 8.432 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -3.13 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 9.968 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Posttreatment Week 4 | 1.11 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 12.638 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 21.70 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 12.656 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Week 4 | 0.01 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 0.829 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baselline at Week 2 | -1.17 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 7.98 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC based on 28 joints (TJC28), SJC based on 28 joints (SJC28), PtGA, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA), and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 30.19 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.283 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -4.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.786 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -6.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.016 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -4.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.349 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -1.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.293 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 33.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.061 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -1.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.439 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -5.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.035 |
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually administered by the participant. Responses in each functional category were collected as 0-3 \[0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 1.063 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.713 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -0.203 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5242 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -0.234 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4492 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | -0.156 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.355 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Posttreatment Week 4 | 0.094 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1197 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Baseline | 1.650 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7776 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -0.100 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3687 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Subscales (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Change from Baseline at Week 2 | -0.150 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2054 |
Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Hybrid ACR evaluates the improvement in active RA by combining elements of the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 with a continuous score of the mean change in core set measures. The percentage improvement from baseline was computed in each of the components of the ACR. The average percent improvement was calculated and used with the participant's ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 status to compute the hybrid ACR response, with a positive change indicating improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 2 | 1.51 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 30.687 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 4 | 3.29 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 36.098 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Posttreatment Week 4 | 0.44 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 34.589 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 2 | 4.41 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 25.41 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 4 | -4.06 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 14.459 |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Hybrid ACR Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Posttreatment Week 4 | -7.65 percent improvement | Standard Deviation 20.606 |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity\]; patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain\]; HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 \[0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do\]; hsCRP.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 2 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 4 | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Posttreatment Week 4 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 2 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Week 4 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | At Posttreatment Week 4 | 0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PhGA and PtGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity); patient's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 (0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating unbearable pain); HAQ-DI score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do); high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP).
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4 | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2 | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Posttreatment Week 4 | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Posttreatment Week 4 | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2 | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Low disease activity is defined as CDAI ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10) | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10) | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on CDAI (<= 10) | 31.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on CDAI (<= 10) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on CDAI (<= 10) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Low disease activity is defined as DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2) | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week4: Low Disease Activity DAS28-CRP (<=3.2) | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity on DAS28-CRP (<= 3.2) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week4: Low Disease Activity DAS28-CRP (<=3.2) | 0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Low disease activity is defined as SDAI ≤ 11. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11) | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on SDAI (<= 11) | 37.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Low Disease Activity based on SDAI (<= 11) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity Response as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Low Disease Activity on SDAI (<= 11) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 2.8. CDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, and PhGA. PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. CDAI total score range: 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \> 22 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by CDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on CDAI (<= 2.8) | 0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Clinical remission is defined as DAS28-CRP \< 2.6. DAS28 score was used to measure the participant's disease activity or assessments of RA calculated using the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA (VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity) and CRP for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by DAS28-CRP at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on DAS28-CRP (< 2.6) | 0 percentage of participants |
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Clinical remission is defined as SDAI ≤ 3.3. SDAI is a composite measure that sums the TJC28, SJC28, PtGA, PhGA, and the CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhGA assessed using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 indicating no disease activity and 100 indicating maximum disease activity\]. SDAI total score range: 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission and SDAI \> 26 = high disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Tirabrutinib 20 mg QD | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 2: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1, Part A: Placebo | Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission as Measured by SDAI at Weeks 2, 4 and Posttreatment Week 4 | Post Week 4: Remission based on SDAI (<= 3.3) | 0 percentage of participants |