Skip to content

Comparing Minimal Invasive Surgery en Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Prospective Comparative Randomized International Multicenter Study Comparing MIS Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02625311
Acronym
MIS
Enrollment
69
Registered
2015-12-09
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

Randomized clinical trial comparing minimal invasive operating technique to conventional operating technique for placement of total knee prosthesis. Clinical evaluations, patient questionnaires, X-rays and CT scans were done to compare these two techniques.

Detailed description

Study executed with 3 centers and 69 patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgery method using CR TKP

Operation through minimal invasive surgery or standard open surgery

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) * patients with Osteo arthritis * intact collateral ligaments and patella tendon * patients willing and able to comply with the post-operative schedule

Exclusion criteria

* patients who require a revision TKA * patients with TKA contralateral knee within 6 months with bad outcomes * patients who need a TKA on contralateral side within 2 years * intraoperative resurfacing of patella * intraoperative eversion of patella * patients who had prior procedure of involved knee such as high tibial osteotomy, cruciate ligament recontruction, knee fusion or patellectomy * BMI \> 30 * patients with fixed flexion contracture\> 15 degrees * patients with deformity greater than 20 degrees of varus or 15 degrees of valgus * Patient with Mediolateral stability \> 10 degrees patient with active or suspected malignancy * patient with Rheumatoid arthritis * patient with systemic disease that would effect subject's wellfare or overall outcome of the study * patient with other severe concurrent joint involvement which can effect their outcome * patients with an immobile hip * patient with a history of Pulmonary embolism or Deep venous thrombosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
range of motionpre-op vs post-op until 5 years post-opmeasurement of flexion and extension in degrees
blood loss24 hours after surgerymeasurement of milliliters blood loss during the first 24 hours after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient questionnairepre-op vs post-op until 5 year post operativeWOMAC pain and function score
chair rise and stair climb testpre-op vs post-op until 5 years post operativeAbility of patient rise from chair and climb stairs, amount of pain on VAS 1-10 does the patient have during these activities

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026