Skip to content

Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism

Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02624791
Enrollment
11
Registered
2015-12-08
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2020-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Keywords

astigmatism, contact lens, driving

Brief summary

Small amounts of astigmatism are often uncorrected in contact lens wearers. The effect with respect to driving is unknown, but it could threaten safe operation of a motor vehicle, especially under conditions such as nighttime driving when visual abilities are highly challenged. This study measures driving-specific visual abilities and simulated driving performance in participants with astigmatism who either have or do not have their astigmatism corrected. The primary hypothesis is that at a tactical level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in safer driving performance overall. The secondary hypothesis is that at an operational level, contact lenses correcting for astigmatism will result in better driving-specific visual performance.

Detailed description

Safe driving relies heavily on good vision. Good vision while driving relates to multiple abilities, such as dynamic visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, management of glare and peripheral vision, etc. While spherical contact lenses address issues of correction of visual acuity as determined by forward static vision tests, if they do not provide visual acuity both immediately and smoothly with eye movement then vision can be compromised. Glare can be a problem as well when contact lenses are off center. Fluctuating vision as a result of lens movement on the eye could be especially problematic and frustrating for patients who have astigmatism. Furthermore, experiencing moments of blurred vision no matter how brief can be potentially hazardous while driving. The 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses have a unique blink-activated stabilization system to prevent rotation of the lens on the eye, and may have significant visual advantages for drivers with astigmatism. These lenses provide continuous corrected acuity compared to non-ballasted contact lenses, and thus are potentially safer for driving. Contact comparison will consist of 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST (spherical control) versus 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM (the daily disposable astigmatism alternative). The study will investigate the potential advantages of contact lenses specifically designed to correct for astigmatism, compared to similar correction with spherical contacts, for adult licensed drivers with astigmatism, employing a double-blind (subjects and research assistant blind to hypotheses), randomized, cross-over design (spherical, vs. astigmatism contacts). This will be a multi-stage study comprised of the following: Preliminary study to determine the likelihood of detecting a significant difference between the standard spherical and astigmatism contacts in a full Randomize Clinical Trial (n=12; data and power analysis)

Interventions

OTHERNo contact lenses

simulated driving tests

DEVICE1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

spherical contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

DEVICE1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

toric contact lenses worn during simulated driving tests

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

participants and research assistant blind to hypothesis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult licensed drivers between the ages of 18-39, similar number of males and females will be studied who meet the following inclusion criteria: * Bilateral corrected vision of 20/40 or better * Bilateral astigmatism between 0.75 to 2.0 diopters, with spherical correction from -1 to -6 * No active eye infection * No defective peripheral vision * Do not have correction for bifocals * Routinely wear contact lenses more than 4 times per week * Routinely drive a car more than 4 times week * Do not have a history of motion, sea or big screen (e.g. IMAX) sickness or experience persistent Simulation Adaptation Syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral corrected vision of worse than 20/40 * No astigmatism * Active eye infection * Defective peripheral vision * Wear bifocals * Wears contact lenses less than 4 times per week * Drives infrequently (less than 4 times per week)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tactical Composite Score1 day laboratory studyZ-score composite of tactical testing outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operational Composite Score1 day laboratory studyZ-score composite of operational testing outcomes

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Contact Lens Sequence
Order in which each participant received the 3 lens conditions
11
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject200000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicContact Lens Sequence
Age, Continuous22.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Tactical Composite Score

Z-score composite of tactical testing outcomes

Time frame: 1 day laboratory study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Contact Lens RxTactical Composite ScoreNone-1.73 Z scoreStandard Deviation 3.53
Contact Lens RxTactical Composite ScoreSphere0.19 Z scoreStandard Deviation 2.62
Contact Lens RxTactical Composite ScoreToric1.54 Z scoreStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

Operational Composite Score

Z-score composite of operational testing outcomes

Time frame: 1 day laboratory study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Contact Lens RxOperational Composite ScoreNone-2.77 Z scoreStandard Deviation 4.3
Contact Lens RxOperational Composite ScoreSphere1.37 Z scoreStandard Deviation 2.37
Contact Lens RxOperational Composite ScoreToric1.40 Z scoreStandard Deviation 2.65

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026