Skip to content

The Effect of Odors on Asthma Symptoms

The Effect of Suggestion of Harmful/Beneficial Effects of Odors on Asthma Symptoms

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02624362
Enrollment
48
Registered
2015-12-08
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Odor, trigger, inflammation, nocebo

Brief summary

An extended replication of Jaen & Dalton (2014), the investigators aim to investigate the role of odors and associated trigger beliefs on symptom perception and airway inflammation in individuals with asthma

Detailed description

Participants with asthma are randomly assigned to a 15-min (phenylethyl alcohol) odor inhalation, accompanied by either an asthmogenic suggestion (nocebo), or a therapeutic suggestion (placebo). Airway inflammation, lung function, and asthma symptoms are measured in response to the odor/suggestion, up to 24 hours after odor inhalation. The investigators are also measuring worry and heart rate variability as potential mediators of the response.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTherapeutic Suggestion

suggestions about potential beneficial effects of the odor are given

BEHAVIORALAsthmogenic Suggestion

suggestions about potential negative effects of the odor are given

OTHERPhenylethyl Alcohol odor

Over the course of 15 minutes, participants, receive 15 short sniffs of Phenylethyl Alcohol odor

Sponsors

KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Research Foundation Flanders
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A physician diagnosis of asthma

Exclusion criteria

* FEV1 lower than 60% predicted * clinical condition other than asthma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Exhaled Nitric Oxide to 24 hours after odor inductionbaseline, immediately after odor induction, 2 hours after odor induction, 24 hours after odor inductionFraction of exhaled nitric oxide

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced Expiratory Volume at one second (FEV1)baseline, immediately after odor induction, 2 hours after odor induction, 24 hours after odor inductionMeasured using Jaeger Masterscreen Spirometer, according to ERS-ATS guidelines
Worrybaseline, immediately after odor induction, 2 hours after odor induction, 24 hours after odor inductionmeasured using worry Visual Analog Scales
Cortisolbaseline, immediately after odor induction, 2 hours after odor induction, at awakening, 30 min after awakening, 24 hours after odor inductioncortisol awakening response (AUC), and changes in cortisol (AUC) will be measured using saliva sampling
asthma symptomsbaseline, immediately after odor induction, 2 hours after odor induction, 24 hours after odor inductionmeasured using the Asthma Symptom Checklist
Change in Respiratory ratechange from baseline to 15 min odor presentationrespiratory rate (breaths/min) is recorded continuously, and changes between baseline and odor presentation periods will be analysed
change in Fraction of end-tidal carbon dioxide (FetCO2)change from baseline to 15 min odor presentationFetCO2 (plateau %CO2 in exhaled air) is recorded continuously, and changes between baseline and odor presentation periods will be analysed
Change in Heart rate and Heart Rate Variability (HRV)change from baseline to 24 hours after odor induction24 hour heart rate data will be recorded using an ambulatory ECG monitor, and analyzed in 1 hour epochs, extracting mean of successive differences (MSD) as a variable of interest.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026