Skip to content

Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial

Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02623426
Acronym
MERIT
Enrollment
194
Registered
2015-12-07
Start date
2017-03-09
Completion date
2022-02-02
Last updated
2023-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Edema, Uveitis

Keywords

uveitic macular edema, uveitis

Brief summary

The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.

Detailed description

Macular edema (ME) is the most common structural complication and cause of visual impairment and legal blindness in uveitis patients. Traditional approaches to the treatment of uveitic ME have included the use of regional corticosteroid therapy, delivered periocularly, including posterior sub-Tenon's and orbital floor injections, or via the intravitreal route. While corticosteroid injections may reduce ME and improve vision, the effect is often variable with a limited duration. Persistent macular edema is a common occurrence and often requires repeated intravitreal injections of corticosteroids, which expose eyes to a significant risk of increased intraocular pressure ocular and cataract development. The often refractory nature of uveitic ME and its impact on visual function underscores the need to identify effective alternative medical therapeutic options. Recent pilot studies have shown intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) and intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®, Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) to be promising treatments for uveitic ME, and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine, CA) has recently been approved by the U.S. FDA for uveitic ME in patients with non-infectious uveitis. In addition to being effective, intravitreal MTX and ranibizumab potentially may have less ocular side effects than corticosteroids, particularly less IOP elevation. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, ranibizumab, and dexamethasone implant. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative effectiveness trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.

Interventions

Standard preparation as described for intravitreal injections.

DRUGIntravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg

Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.

DRUGIntravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to the injection.

Sponsors

National Eye Institute (NEI)
CollaboratorNIH
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient level inclusion criterion 1. 18 years of age or older; Eye level inclusion criteria - at least one eye must meet all of the following conditions 2. Inactive or minimally active non-infectious anterior, intermediate, posterior or panuveitis, as defined by the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group criteria as ≤ 0.5+ anterior chamber cells, ≤ 0.5+ vitreous haze grade and no active retinal/choroidal lesions for a minimum of 4 weeks; 3. Macular edema (ME) defined as the presence of macular thickness greater than the normal range for the OCT machine being used (see cut points below), regardless of the presence of cysts, following an intravitreal corticosteroid injection (≥ 4 weeks following intravitreal triamcinolone injection or ≥ 12 weeks following intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection); Greater than 300 μm for Zeiss Cirrus Greater than 320 μm for Heidelberg Spectralis Greater than 300 μm for Topcon SD OCT 4. Baseline fluorescein angiogram that, as assessed by the study ophthalmologist, is gradable for degree of leakage in the central subfield; 5. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 5/200 or better; 6. Baseline intraocular pressure \> 5 mm Hg and ≤ 21 mm Hg (current use of ≤3 intraocular pressure-lowering medications and/or prior glaucoma surgery are acceptable (Note: combination medications, e.g., Combigan, are counted as two IOP-lowering medications); 7. Media clarity and pupillary dilation sufficient to allow OCT testing and assessment of the fundus.

Exclusion criteria

Patient level

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 WeeksAt 12-week visitThe primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 12 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. The proportion of baseline subfield thickness is estimated by a mixed effect model that includes time points for baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 and the treatment group. The treatment effect is the interaction (product) of time point and treatment. Contrasts of the model parameter estimates were used to calculate the change from baseline to week 12 and the comparison between treatment groups. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases (improvement).The OCT outcomes were measured by masked readers. The 12-week visit was chosen as the time to assess the primary outcome because of the ranibizumab treatment schedule and the peak effect time for dexamethasone

Countries

Australia, Canada, India, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ozurdex (0.7 mg Dexamethasone Pellet) Delivered Via Intravitreal Injection
Ozurdex (0.7 mg dexamethasone pellet) delivered via intravitreal injection at week 0 Eligible eye (s) treated at week 0 Second injection required at Week 8 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria is met. Retreatment criteria : 1. Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield. 2. IOP of \<25 mm Hg (treatment with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents permitted), IOP criteria for initial injection of study treatment in eligible eye(s) is ≤21 mm Hg with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents
65
Ozurdex (0.7 mg Dexamethasone Pellet) Delivered Via Intravitreal Injection
Ozurdex (0.7 mg dexamethasone pellet) delivered via intravitreal injection at week 0 Eligible eye (s) treated at week 0 Second injection required at Week 8 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria is met. Retreatment criteria : 1. Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield. 2. IOP of \<25 mm Hg (treatment with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents permitted), IOP criteria for initial injection of study treatment in eligible eye(s) is ≤21 mm Hg with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents
77
Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution, Preservative-free
Intravitreal methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL Eligible eye(s) treated at week 0 Retreatment required at M02, M03 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria met Retreatment criteria: 1. Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield. 2. IOP of \<25 mm Hg (treatment with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents permitted), IOP criteria for initial injection of study treatment in eligible eye(s) is ≤21 mm Hg with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents
65
Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution, Preservative-free
Intravitreal methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL Eligible eye(s) treated at week 0 Retreatment required at M02, M03 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria met Retreatment criteria: 1. Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield. 2. IOP of \<25 mm Hg (treatment with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents permitted), IOP criteria for initial injection of study treatment in eligible eye(s) is ≤21 mm Hg with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents
79
Intravitreal Ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mL
Intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mL Eligible eye(s) treated M01+ Retreatment required at M02, M03 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria met Retreatment criteria: 1\) Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield.
64
Intravitreal Ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mL
Intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mL Eligible eye(s) treated M01+ Retreatment required at M02, M03 if retreatment criteria met Retreatment permitted at M04 and later if retreatment criteria met Retreatment criteria: 1\) Central subfield thickness greater than 1.1 times upper limit of normal (330 µm for Zeiss and Topcon SD OCT and 352 µm for Heidelberg OCT) and/or cystoid space(s) within 1 mm central subfield.
69
Total419

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution, Preservative-freeTotalIntravitreal Ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mLOzurdex (0.7 mg Dexamethasone Pellet) Delivered Via Intravitreal Injection
Age, Continuous59 years58 years57 years59 years
Concomitant systemic medication27 Participants84 Participants29 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
63 Participants189 Participants62 Participants64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Intraocular pressure (IOP)15 mm Hg14 mm Hg14 mm Hg15 mm Hg
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants28 Participants8 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants51 Participants13 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants7 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants107 Participants41 Participants38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 participants7 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 participants8 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
9 participants27 participants8 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants25 participants8 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants127 participants44 participants40 participants
Retinal thickness at the center subfield476 um453 um401 um457 um
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants129 Participants40 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants65 Participants24 Participants24 Participants
Visual acuity64 Standard letters66 Standard letters67 Standard letters68 Standard letters

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 650 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 6524 / 6514 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 657 / 653 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 Weeks

The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 12 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. The proportion of baseline subfield thickness is estimated by a mixed effect model that includes time points for baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 and the treatment group. The treatment effect is the interaction (product) of time point and treatment. Contrasts of the model parameter estimates were used to calculate the change from baseline to week 12 and the comparison between treatment groups. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases (improvement).The OCT outcomes were measured by masked readers. The 12-week visit was chosen as the time to assess the primary outcome because of the ranibizumab treatment schedule and the peak effect time for dexamethasone

Time frame: At 12-week visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Ozurdex (0.7 mg Dexamethasone Pellet) Delivered Via Intravitreal InjectionProportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 Weeks0.65 Proportion of baseline retinal thickness
Intravitreal Methotrexate 400 µg in 0.1 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solution, Preservative-freeProportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 Weeks0.88 Proportion of baseline retinal thickness
Intravitreal Ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.5 mg in 0.05 mLProportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 12 Weeks0.79 Proportion of baseline retinal thickness
Comparison: A sample size of 240 was calculated to provide 91% power to detect a 25% reduction for Ozurdex, a 38% reduction for Methotrexate and Lucentis assuming a standard deviation of 0.33, 25% with bilateral disease, between-eye correlation of 0.4, 10% loss to follow-up, and a two-sided type 1 error rate of 0.025 for each pairwise comparison.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.19, 1.56]mixed effects model
Comparison: A sample size of 240 was calculated to provide 91% power to detect a 25% reduction for Ozurdex, a 38% reduction for methotrexate and Lucentis assuming a standard deviation of 0.33, 25% with bilateral disease, between-eye correlation of 0.4, 10% loss to follow-up, and a two-sided type 1 error rate of 0.025 for each pairwise comparison.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.04, 1.43]mixed effects model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026