Skip to content

Investigation Into the Functional Performance of a New Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) Transtibial Liner

Investigation Into the Functional Performance of a New Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) Transtibial Liner

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02622919
Enrollment
14
Registered
2015-12-07
Start date
2016-03-30
Completion date
2019-01-30
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation Stumps

Brief summary

The clinical investigation is designed as an uncontrolled open prospective, multicenter, 2 group, pre-test post-test study. Testing will be conducted in the USA and Canada at 3-6 clinics, depending on enrolment requirements. 20 subjects currently using the comparator liner will be recruited: 10 using cushion/sleeve and 10 using pin-lock. The study consists of 4 study events, requiring subjects to visit the clinic at least 4 times; as this study requires the manufacturing of a new socket, more than one iterations might be required. These events will be as follows

Detailed description

The study is of an uncontrolled open prospective multicentre 2 group pre-test post-test design. i) Recruitment phase Potential subjects will be identified from the customer base of the Local Principal Investigator (LPI). LPI evaluates, based on previous experience of interaction with and servicing of patients, if a potential participant is cognitively capable. If a potential participant fits the inclusion and exclusion criteria the LPI will contact them via telephone. During the telephone call the LPI will verify if they are interested in participating in a study. If interest is expressed at this point they will answer some screening questions and if the eligibility criteria are met an appointment will be made for the clinical visit and signing of the ICF. Questions relating to the duration of the study, number of clinical visits required and the investigational device will be answered. The LPI will communicate to the study monitor the number of users he has identified that meet the inclusion criteria and are willing to participate. ii) Test procedure 3-10 users will be recruited at each site. User Profile instrument will be filled in at the initial visit. It will be filled in by the CPI/LPI with input from the subject. Baseline instrument will also be filled in at the initial visit. It consists of 5 parts: Usability, Suspension Questionnaire, PEQ - Residual Limb Health (PEQ-RLH), Comfort and other (noise and satisfaction). They only include VAS items and comment boxes. Additionally the pistoning test output is documented at the end. The first part, socket fit comfort, of the Socket fitting instrument will be administrated each time as required, depending on iterations needed. CPO feedback, usability and comfort will only be administrated when the subject comes in for the first time for the fitting. The 2 week follow up instrument will be administrated at the 2 week post successful fitting visit. It consists of 5 parts: Usability, Suspension Questionnaire, PEQ-RLH, and Comfort and Other; same as Baseline. Additionally the pistoning test output for both the trial liner (ICEROSS TPE) and is ICEROSS COMFORT is documented at the end. The Retrofitting instrument is also administrated at study event 3 (expected visit 3). The instrument used at the 6 month follow up consists of 4 parts: Suspension Questionnaire, PEQ-RLH, Comfort, and Other. The Other part has additional questions compared to the instruments used at earlier visits. All items are in-house developed except for the socket fit comfort score\[4\] and PEQ-RLH\[5\]. iii) Visit Schedule and forms to fill out There are at least four scheduled study events. Each visit, except when fitting to trial product will take approximately 2 hours. The trial product fitting visits (event nr. 2, 2a, 2b, etc.) should last for no more than 30 minutes. The first event is a visit within the normal treatment procedures of prosthetic care when the users are measured for a new socket. The ICF will be signed prior to any study activity. During the visit the subjects will also fill in the User Profile and Baseline instruments, with the help of their CPO as required. This test, as is standard for liner testing, requires that the users will be fitted with a new socket. Attaining a proper fit of a new socket requires at least one iteration, often more, and few days to complete, and hence some users might require more study visits than others. The second study event will be 1-2 weeks post first visit, when the new socket is ready. Subjects will come in and fit the new socket while wearing the investigational device. To verify that the socket is acceptable subjects will be asked to fill in the Socket fitting instrument. If the outcome is positive the subject will be scheduled for the 2 week follow up and subject goes home with the new prosthetic liner. If not, a new socket must be made or adjustments to the one manufactured and another visit set up for this event. The third study event is the 2 week follow up. During the visit the subject will fill in the 2 week follow up instrument and the Retrofitting instrument, after retrofitting. Subject keeps using the investigational device. The final study event, and expected fourth visit, is at 6 months post successful fitting. The subject fills in the 6 month follow up instrument, receives compensation as applicable and ends study participation. The subjects will return the trial device at the 6 month visit.

Interventions

DEVICETPE Liner

Subjects are asked to change their primary prosthetic liner. This entails getting a new socket as well. Subjects are expected to use the new liner for up to 6 months. No other intervention is planned.

Sponsors

Össur Iceland ehf
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study * Bi- or unilateral transtibial amputee, low to moderate impact * Amputee currently using a cushion (n=10) or a locking (n=10) 3 or 6 mm OWW Alpha Classic Uniform, or 3 mm OWW Alpha Classic Tapered liner * Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol * Confident prosthetic users for more than 3 months * Older than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Users with cognitive impairment * Transfemoral amputees * Amputees not using a prosthesis for daily activities * Amputees not using OWW Alpha Classic cushion (n=10) or a locking (n=10), 3 or 6 mm OWW Alpha Classic Uniform, or 3 mm OWW Alpha Classic Tapered liners, as part of their primary prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Suspension Quality Score2 weeksSuspension Score: Suspension quality was assessed using an in-house developed questionnaire consisting of 7 items evaluating perceived prosthetic suspension and security throughout the day. The items assessed stability in the socket, suspension in the morning, afternoon, and evening, vertical movement (pistoning), rotational movement, and the influence of perspiration on suspension. Each item was rated on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. Depending on the item, 0 represented the poorest suspension outcome (e.g., completely disagree, extreme influence of perspiration) and 10 represented the best suspension outcome (e.g., completely agree, no influence of perspiration). Item scores were averaged to obtain an overall suspension score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived suspension quality and security.
Residual Limb Health Subscale Score (Average of 6 Items)2 weeksResidual Limb Health Subscale Score (average of 6 items). Residual limb health was assessed using the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire - Residual Limb Health (PEQ-RLH) subscale, which evaluates sweating, odor, swelling, rashes, ingrown hairs, and sores or blisters on the residual limb. Participants rated each item on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the poorest residual limb health (most severe symptoms) and 10 represents the best residual limb health (no symptoms). The overall PEQ-RLH score was calculated as the mean of the six item scores, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate better residual limb health and fewer skin-related problems.
Number of Subjects That Drop Out Because of Dissatisfaction With the Liner (Not Socket Related).6 monthsNumber of participants who discontinued study participation because of dissatisfaction with the investigational liner, excluding discontinuations related to socket fit or socket-related issues. Lower values indicate better user acceptance of the investigational liner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Socket Fit Comfort VAS Score2 weeksSocket Fit Comfort: Participants rated the comfort of socket fit using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scores ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 = extremely uncomfortable socket fit and 10 = extremely comfortable socket fit. Higher scores indicate better perceived socket fit comfort.
Participants Able to Use the Trial Liner as Their Primary Prosthesis2 weeksNumber of participants able to use the investigational liner as their primary prosthesis during the study period. Higher values indicate successful use of the liner under normal conditions of use.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJustin Pratt, CPO

Össur

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 14

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026