Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (MK-3475-173/KEYNOTE-173)

A Phase 1b Study to Evaluate Safety and Clinical Activity of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) - (KEYNOTE 173)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02622074
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-12-04
Start date
2016-01-27
Completion date
2019-11-18
Last updated
2020-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD1, PD-1), Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1, PD-L1), Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and clinical activity of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in combination with six chemotherapy regimens as neoadjuvant treatment for participants with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPembrolizumab

200 mg administered Q3W as an IV infusion.

DRUGNab-paclitaxel

125 mg/m\^2 or 100 mg/m\^2 administered weekly as an IV infusion, according to allocation.

DRUGAnthracycline (doxorubicin)

60 mg/m\^2 administered Q3W as an IV injection.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

600 mg/m\^2 administered Q3W as an IV infusion.

DRUGCarboplatin

AUC 6 or AUC5 administered Q3W as an IV infusion, or AUC2 administered weekly as an IV infusion, according to allocation.

DRUGPaclitaxel

80 mg/m\^2 or 70 mg/m\^2 administered weekly as an IV infusion, according to allocation.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has previously untreated, locally advanced TNBC. * Is able to provide 2 core needle biopsies from the primary tumor at screening to the central laboratory and agrees to have a core needle biopsy after single dose pembrolizumab treatment if tumor biopsy is feasible as judged by the investigator. * Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. * Has adequate organ function. * Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use adequate contraception for the course of the study through 12 months after the last dose of study drug for participants receiving cyclophosphamide and through 6 months after the last dose of study drug for participants who do not receive cyclophosphamide.

Exclusion criteria

* Has evidence of metastatic breast cancer, concurrent bilateral invasive breast cancer, or inflammatory breast cancer. * Has another malignancy within the last 5 years. Exceptions include basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has undergone potentially curative surgery, or in situ cervical cancer. * Has received prior chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy that targets immune checkpoints, co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory pathways for T cell receptors within the past 12 months. * Is currently participating and receiving study therapy, or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy or used an investigational device within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug. * Has received a live vaccine within 30 days of the first dose of study drug. * Has an active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in past 2 years. * Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving systemic steroid therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug. * Has a known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). * Has known active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C. * Has evidence of current pneumonitis. * Has a history of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring treatment with steroids or a history of interstitial lung disease. * Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy. * Has significant cardiovascular disease, such as: History of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome or coronary angioplasty/stenting/bypass grafting within the last 6 months; Congestive heart failure (CHF) New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV or history of CHF NYHA class III or IV * Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the study. * Is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive children within the projected duration of the study, starting with the screening visit through 12 months after the last dose of trial treatment for participants who have received cyclophosphamide, and for six months after the last dose of study medication for participants who have not. * Has a known hypersensitivity to the components of the study drug or its analogs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)Cycle 1 Day 1 through end of Cycle 3 and Cycle 6 Day 1 through end of Cycle 7 (Up to ~150 days from first dose of first combination regimen); Each cycle was 21 days.The following events, if considered to be study-treatment-related by the Investigator, were considered a DLT: * Hematologic: * Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥8 days; * Febrile neutropenia Grade 3 or Grade 4; or * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion, or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding * Non-hematologic: * Grade 4 toxicity; * Grade ≥3 symptomatic hepatic toxicities lasting \>48 hours, or Grade ≥3 asymptomatic hepatic toxicities lasting ≥7 days; or * Grade ≥3 non-hematologic, non-hepatic organ toxicity, with exceptions * Other: * Any treatment delays for ≥14 days due to unresolved toxicity; * Grade 5 treatment-related adverse event (AE); * A dose reduction of study treatment during the DLT evaluation period.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 28 months (through Interim database cut-off date of 31-May-2018)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE either prior to or after definitive surgery is presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 28 months (through Interim database cut-off date of 31-May-2018)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination RegimenAfter completion of the second combination regimen (KAC; Cycle 9) but prior to surgery (Up to ~9 months); Each cycle was 21 days.ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions) according to RECIST 1.1 by Investigator review. Because imaging was assessed prior to surgery, a confirmation assessment of CR or PR was not obtained. Participants with missing outcome for objective response were considered non-responders. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR based on RECIST 1.1 following the second combination regimen is presented.
Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6Month 6EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 6 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12Month 12EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 12 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)Up to approximately 9 months (at the time of definitive surgery)pCR rate (ypT0 ypN0; no invasive or noninvasive residual in breast or nodes) was defined as the rate of absence of residual invasive and in situ cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria assessed by local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery. The percentage of participants with a pCR using the definition of ypT0 ypN0 is presented.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6Month 6OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 6 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12Month 12OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 12 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 24Month 24OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 24 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 24Month 24EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 24 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)Up to approximately 9 months (at the time of definitive surgery)pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0; no invasive residual in breast or nodes; noninvasive breast residuals allowed) was defined as the rate of absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy by AJCC staging criteria assessed by local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery. The percentage of participants with a pCR using the alternative definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 is presented.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination RegimenAt the end of Cycle 5 following treatment with the first combination regimen (KNp, KNpCb, or KTCb) (Up to ~4 months); Each cycle was 21 days.ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions) according to RECIST 1.1 by Investigator review. Because imaging was assessed prior to surgery, a confirmation assessment of CR or PR was not obtained. Participants with missing outcome for objective response were considered non-responders. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR based on RECIST 1.1 following the first combination regimen is presented.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Sixty participants were allocated and treated on study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: KNp / KAC
Participants received pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg in Cycles 2-5 on Day 1 (once every 3 weeks; Q3W) PLUS nab-paclitaxel (KNp) starting at 125 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (once each week; QW). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via intravenous (IV) infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KAC
Participants first received KNpCb Regimen 1 which consisted of: pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 PLUS nab-paclitaxel (KNp) starting at 100 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (QW) PLUS carboplatin (Cb) starting at Area Under the Curve (AUC) 6 in Cycles 2-5 on Day 1 (Q3W). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via IV infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KAC
Participants first received KNpCb Regimen 2 which consisted of: pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 PLUS nab-paclitaxel (KNp) starting at 125 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (QW) PLUS carboplatin (Cb) starting at AUC 5 in Cycles 2-5 on Day 1 (Q3W). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via IV infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KAC
Participants first received KNpCb Regimen 3 which consisted of: pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 PLUS nab-paclitaxel (KNp) starting at 125 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (QW) PLUS carboplatin (Cb) starting at AUC 2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (QW). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via IV infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KAC
Participants first received KTCb Regimen 1 which consisted of: pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 PLUS paclitaxel (T) starting at 80mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8, and 15 (QW) PLUS carboplatin (Cb) starting at AUC 5 in Cycles 2-5 on Day 1 (Q3W). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via IV infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KAC
Participants first received KTCb Regimen 2 which consisted of: pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 1 PLUS paclitaxel (T) starting at 80mg/m\^2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8, and 15 PLUS carboplatin (Cb) starting at AUC 2 in Cycles 2-5 on Days 1, 8 and 15 (QW). This was followed by pembrolizumab (K) 200 mg in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W) PLUS cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m\^2 in Cycles 6-9 on Day 1 (Q3W). All treatments were administered via IV infusion except for doxorubicin (A), which was administered via IV injection. Each cycle was 21 days.
10
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyDeath400110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: KNp / KACCohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACCohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACCohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACCohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACCohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACTotal
Age, Continuous51.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
43.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
56.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
52.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
49.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants9 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants9 Participants9 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 100 / 100 / 101 / 101 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1010 / 1010 / 1010 / 1010 / 1010 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 104 / 108 / 107 / 103 / 104 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months (through Interim database cut-off date of 31-May-2018)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: KNp / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)1 Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)2 Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)1 Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)5 Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)2 Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE either prior to or after definitive surgery is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months (through Interim database cut-off date of 31-May-2018)

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: KNp / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)10 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)

The following events, if considered to be study-treatment-related by the Investigator, were considered a DLT: * Hematologic: * Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥8 days; * Febrile neutropenia Grade 3 or Grade 4; or * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion, or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding * Non-hematologic: * Grade 4 toxicity; * Grade ≥3 symptomatic hepatic toxicities lasting \>48 hours, or Grade ≥3 asymptomatic hepatic toxicities lasting ≥7 days; or * Grade ≥3 non-hematologic, non-hepatic organ toxicity, with exceptions * Other: * Any treatment delays for ≥14 days due to unresolved toxicity; * Grade 5 treatment-related adverse event (AE); * A dose reduction of study treatment during the DLT evaluation period.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 through end of Cycle 3 and Cycle 6 Day 1 through end of Cycle 7 (Up to ~150 days from first dose of first combination regimen); Each cycle was 21 days.

Population: The DLT evaluable population consisted of all participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: KNp / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)2 Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)4 Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)6 Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)6 Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)0 Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded Using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0)4 Participants
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12

EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 12 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 1280.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 1290.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 24

EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 24 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 24

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 2460.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 2490.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 2490.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6

EFS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence (for participants with complete surgical resection), progression (for participants with incomplete surgical resection), or death due to any cause. Participants without documented events were censored at the date of the last disease status assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were event free at Month 6 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 690.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6100.00 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 690.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACEvent-Free Survival (EFS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions) according to RECIST 1.1 by Investigator review. Because imaging was assessed prior to surgery, a confirmation assessment of CR or PR was not obtained. Participants with missing outcome for objective response were considered non-responders. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR based on RECIST 1.1 following the first combination regimen is presented.

Time frame: At the end of Cycle 5 following treatment with the first combination regimen (KNp, KNpCb, or KTCb) (Up to ~4 months); Each cycle was 21 days.

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen60.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen90.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen90.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen90.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen60.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: First Combination Regimen80.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions) according to RECIST 1.1 by Investigator review. Because imaging was assessed prior to surgery, a confirmation assessment of CR or PR was not obtained. Participants with missing outcome for objective response were considered non-responders. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR based on RECIST 1.1 following the second combination regimen is presented.

Time frame: After completion of the second combination regimen (KAC; Cycle 9) but prior to surgery (Up to ~9 months); Each cycle was 21 days.

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen80.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen100 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen100 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen90.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen70.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Investigator Review: Second Combination Regimen90.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12

OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 12 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 1280.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 1290.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 12100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 24

OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 24 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 24

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 2470.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 2490.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 2490.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 24100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6

OS was defined as the time from the first dose date of study treatment to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants who were surviving at Month 6 are presented (through Final Analysis cut-off of 18-Nov-2019).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 690.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACOverall Survival (OS) Rate at Month 6100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)

pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0; no invasive residual in breast or nodes; noninvasive breast residuals allowed) was defined as the rate of absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy by AJCC staging criteria assessed by local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery. The percentage of participants with a pCR using the alternative definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 9 months (at the time of definitive surgery)

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)60.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)80.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)80.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)60.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)30.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0 (No Invasive Residual in Breast or Nodes; Noninvasive Breast Residuals Allowed)50.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)

pCR rate (ypT0 ypN0; no invasive or noninvasive residual in breast or nodes) was defined as the rate of absence of residual invasive and in situ cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria assessed by local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery. The percentage of participants with a pCR using the definition of ypT0 ypN0 is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 9 months (at the time of definitive surgery)

Population: The efficacy population consisted of all participants with Baseline evaluable disease by Investigator assessment who started with the recommended Phase 2 dose, regardless of dose modification during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: KNp / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)50.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort B: KNpCb (Regimen 1) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)80.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort C: KNpCb (Regimen 2) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)80.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort D: KNpCb (Regimen 3) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)60.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort E: KTCb (Regimen 1) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)20.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort F: KTCb (Regimen 2) / KACPathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate Using the Definition of ypT0 ypN0 (No Invasive or Noninvasive Residual in Breast or Nodes)50.0 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026