Skip to content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dementia

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02621424
Acronym
rTMS for demen
Enrollment
32
Registered
2015-12-03
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2025-09-16
Last updated
2025-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), RTMS, CVLT

Brief summary

The purpose is to is to study if repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves cognitive function in patients with neurodegenerative conditions which may manifest as mild to moderate cognitive impairment and, in late phase, dementia. This study also intends to investigate if the responses to rTMS intervention are either positively or negatively correlated with the initial severity of cognitive impairment.

Detailed description

The primary hypothesis is that rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will lead to improved memory, language and executive function compared to patients who receive a sham, control treatment. The improvement is defined as having higher performance on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II). Secondary Hypotheses are that: * 1: rTMS- will lead to higher performance on secondary cognitive measures relating to executive function and naming compared to performance by participants in the sham treatment group at the termination of treatment; and that * 2: rTMS-induced memory improvement parallels changes in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICERTMS

stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses

DEVICEsham

sham noise to block the sound of stimulation

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans aged 55 years or older * Diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia likely due to Alzheimer's disease. * Ability to obtain a Motor Threshold, determined during the screening process. * With an adequately stable condition and living environment to enable attendance at scheduled clinic visits. * If on a prescription medication for cognition that medication dose will be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization into the study and participant will be willing to remain on a stable regimen during the acute treatment phase. * Able to read, verbalize understanding, and voluntarily sign the Informed Consent Form to be signed by the participant, or a designated legal representative when the participant lacks decision making capacity prior to participating in any study- specific procedures or assessments.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with prior exposure to rTMS or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). * Unable to safely withdraw, at least two weeks prior to treatment commencement, from medications that substantially increase the risk of having seizures. * Have a cardiac pacemaker or a cochlear implant. * Have an implanted device deep brain stimulation or metal in the brain * Current substance abuse not including caffeine or nicotine as determined by patient report or chart review. * Active current suicidal intent or plan as determined by patient report or chart review. * Current or Prior history of a seizure disorder as determined by patient report or chart review * Traumatic brain injury within the last two months * Participation in another concurrent interventional clinical trial * Known current psychosis as determined by patient report or chart review. * Current or prior history of a mass lesion, cerebral infarct or other non-cognitive, active central nervous system (CNS) disease that would increase the risk for seizure. * Not fluent in English or a hearing impairment severe enough to impair comprehension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month LaterAssessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow upChanges of California verbal learning test scores (CVLT) from baseline after treatment and 4 months later. CVLT is 16 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=16, higher the better memory).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatmentwithin a week following the last treatment session and 4 months laterChanges in BDNF plasma levels (pg/ml) from baseline were analyzed after treatment. BDNF is a plasma biomarker, minimum=0, no maximum. Higher number means more BDNF synthesis).
Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months LaterAssessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow upAnimal Fluency (AF) is a scoring system to assess the ability to generate a list of related words. The score is the number of animals the examinee can name in one minute time. (Minimum = 0, No maximum, higher the better).
Changes in Boston Naming After TreatmentAssessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow upChanges in Boston Naming Test (BNT) from baseline was analyzed. BNT is a 60 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=60, higher the better).
Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 4-month post-treatment follow upA piece of paper with 6 simple drawings is presented to the subject for 10 seconds. The subject is then asked to draw these drawings from memory. The process is repeated three times to assess visual memory and learning. Each correct drawing scores two pints. Maximum score for three trials is 36. Minimum score is 0. Higher the better.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow upMoCA is a one page, 30 point cognitive screening test. It test the following cognitive domains: 1. short-term memory (5 points)- two learning trials of five nouns and delayed recall after approximately five minutes. 2. visuospatial abilities - clock-drawing task (3 points) and copy a cube (1 point). 3. executive functions - alternation task abbreviated trail-making B (1 point), and a two-item verbal abstraction task (2 points). 4. attention, concentration, and working memory - a sustained attention task (target detection using tapping; 1 point), a serial subtraction task (3 points), and digits forward and backward (1 point each). 5. language - three-item confrontation naming (3 points), repetition of two sentences (2 points), and verbal fluency (1 point). 6. abstract reasoning - describe the similarity of tasks (2 points). 7. orientation to time and place (6 points). Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 30. Higher the better.
Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months LaterAssessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow upTrail making B is a scoring system for the assessment of the mental flexibility, processing speed and executive function. The score is the time (in seconds) it takes for the examinee to draw line segments connecting sequentially from 1-A-2-B-3....all the way to12-L-13. (The lower score means faster speed and means better performance. The minimum is (hypothetically) zero. There is no maximum. However, in some test centers, the maximum allowed time is 200 seconds.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Two hundred and twenty nine patients were screened. 43 patients signed consent. 32 were enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

Thirty two patients were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
14
Sham
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
18
Total32

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRTMSShamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Age, Continuous71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
neuropsychological testing14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 142 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later

Changes of California verbal learning test scores (CVLT) from baseline after treatment and 4 months later. CVLT is 16 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=16, higher the better memory).

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month LaterBaseline8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
RTMSChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month LaterEnd of treatment8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
RTMSChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later4 month follow up10.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
ShamChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month LaterBaseline9.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
ShamChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month LaterEnd of treatment8.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
ShamChanges From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later4 month follow up9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)

A piece of paper with 6 simple drawings is presented to the subject for 10 seconds. The subject is then asked to draw these drawings from memory. The process is repeated three times to assess visual memory and learning. Each correct drawing scores two pints. Maximum score for three trials is 36. Minimum score is 0. Higher the better.

Time frame: assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline18.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
RTMSBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)End of treatment19.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
RTMSBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)4 month follow up18.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
ShamBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)Baseline17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
ShamBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)End of treatment17.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
ShamBrief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)4 month follow up16.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later

Animal Fluency (AF) is a scoring system to assess the ability to generate a list of related words. The score is the number of animals the examinee can name in one minute time. (Minimum = 0, No maximum, higher the better).

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not test properly at end of treatment, one did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 12 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Laterbaseline17.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
RTMSChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Laterend of treatment15.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
RTMSChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later4 month followup15.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
ShamChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Laterbaseline15.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
ShamChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Laterend of treatment16.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
ShamChanges in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later4 month followup16.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Changes in Boston Naming After Treatment

Changes in Boston Naming Test (BNT) from baseline was analyzed. BNT is a 60 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=60, higher the better).

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSChanges in Boston Naming After Treatmentbaseline52.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
RTMSChanges in Boston Naming After TreatmentEnd of treatment52.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
RTMSChanges in Boston Naming After Treatment4 month followup54.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
ShamChanges in Boston Naming After Treatmentbaseline53.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
ShamChanges in Boston Naming After TreatmentEnd of treatment56.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
ShamChanges in Boston Naming After Treatment4 month followup55.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Changes in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatment

Changes in BDNF plasma levels (pg/ml) from baseline were analyzed after treatment. BDNF is a plasma biomarker, minimum=0, no maximum. Higher number means more BDNF synthesis).

Time frame: within a week following the last treatment session and 4 months later

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 13 had baseline BDNF collected, two withdrew. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 11 sets of data were available at end of treatment. Active arm: 14 started, two did not have BDNF collected. 12 sets of data were available at baseline and at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSChanges in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatmentbaseline5089 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3508
RTMSChanges in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatmentpost treatment5229 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3713
ShamChanges in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatmentbaseline5054 pg/mlStandard Deviation 3440
ShamChanges in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatmentpost treatment5350 pg/mlStandard Deviation 4981
Secondary

Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later

Trail making B is a scoring system for the assessment of the mental flexibility, processing speed and executive function. The score is the time (in seconds) it takes for the examinee to draw line segments connecting sequentially from 1-A-2-B-3....all the way to12-L-13. (The lower score means faster speed and means better performance. The minimum is (hypothetically) zero. There is no maximum. However, in some test centers, the maximum allowed time is 200 seconds.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Laterbaseline187.5 SecondsStandard Deviation 222.2
RTMSChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Laterend of treatment179.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 207.7
RTMSChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later4 month followup185.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 237.8
ShamChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Laterbaseline172.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 94.8
ShamChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Laterend of treatment150.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 64.9
ShamChanges in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later4 month followup197.6 SecondsStandard Deviation 204.9
Secondary

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

MoCA is a one page, 30 point cognitive screening test. It test the following cognitive domains: 1. short-term memory (5 points)- two learning trials of five nouns and delayed recall after approximately five minutes. 2. visuospatial abilities - clock-drawing task (3 points) and copy a cube (1 point). 3. executive functions - alternation task abbreviated trail-making B (1 point), and a two-item verbal abstraction task (2 points). 4. attention, concentration, and working memory - a sustained attention task (target detection using tapping; 1 point), a serial subtraction task (3 points), and digits forward and backward (1 point each). 5. language - three-item confrontation naming (3 points), repetition of two sentences (2 points), and verbal fluency (1 point). 6. abstract reasoning - describe the similarity of tasks (2 points). 7. orientation to time and place (6 points). Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 30. Higher the better.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, two did not test properly at end of treatment, one did not show for follow up.~13 sets of data were available at baseline, 11 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTMSMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)baseline22.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
RTMSMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)end of treatment22.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
RTMSMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)4 month follow up24.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
ShamMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)baseline24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
ShamMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)end of treatment24.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
ShamMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)4 month follow up24.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026