Skip to content

Evaluation of an Algorithm for Length Based Weight Estimation in Comparison to Known Devices

Evaluation of an Algorithm for Length Based Weight Estimation in Comparison to Already Known Devices Like the Broselow Tape (BT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02620540
Enrollment
312
Registered
2015-12-03
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2017-11-30
Last updated
2018-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weight-Estimation

Keywords

Broselow Tape, Weight estimation, Patient safety

Brief summary

The purpose of this prospective single center study is to investigate if a developed algorithm is more accurate than the Broselow Tape (BT). For this study 500 patients are required to collect anonymized data (length, weight, age, anaesthesia material used during anaesthesia) for achieving a power of 80% during statistical analysis. The main hypothesis ist that the algorithm has a better accuracy than the BT.

Detailed description

This prospective single center study is performed at the university children's hospital zurich. Patients planned for surgery in general anaesthesia with intubation, aged 0 to 16 years and with a body length suitable for the emergency tapes can be included in this study. Patient and parental information is performed during the pre-anaesthetic visit. After written consent the patient will be included. Patient ́s length and weight will be measures earliest one day before data collection. Data collection during anaesthesia has no influence on the daily anaesthesia routine and has no impact on patient safety and anaesthesia. Patient's data is made anonymous for further inspection. Data is documented in Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis calculated with SPSS. 500 patients are needed for a power of 80%. Primary outcome parameter is length- based weight estimation, secondary outcome parameters are length-based age estimation and the correctness of recommended anaesthesia material (endotracheal tube, laryngeal mask, oropharyngeal mask and face mask). Both tools (algorithm and BT) will be compared with each other regarding primary and secondary outcome parameters.

Interventions

DEVICEAccuracy of an algorithm and the Broselow Tape

Computer based comparison of the two devices based on collected patient data

Sponsors

University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* body length suitable with the investigated emergency tapes * all patients aged 0 -16 years * receiving general anaesthesia with intubation or laryngeal mask

Exclusion criteria

* Already included in this study once * missing patient or parental consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
length-based weight-estimation by algorithmduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm estimated bodyweight based on the patient's Body length is investigated regarding the estimations accuracy and cases in the +/- 10% interval

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
length based age estimationduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm estimated age based on the patient's body length is investigated regarding the estimations accuracy
size of endotracheal tubeduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm suggested endotracheal tube based on the patient's Body length is investigated regarding the correctness
size of laryngeal maskduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm suggested laryngeal mask based on the patient's Body length is investigated regarding the correctness
size of facemaskduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm suggested facemask based on the patient's body length is investigated regarding the correctness
size of oropharyngeal tubeduring anaesthesiaThe by the algorithm suggested oropharyngeal tube based on the patient's Body length is investigated regarding the correctness

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026