Skip to content

Physiotherapy for Sciatica; Is Earlier Better?

Physiotherapy Management of Lumbar Radicular Syndrome; Does Early Intervention Improve Outcomes?

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02618278
Acronym
POLAR
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-12-01
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2016-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Radiculopathy, Sciatica

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the whether receiving physiotherapy early after onset of the problem is better than waiting a few weeks to see if it gets better before starting physiotherapy. 80 people with sciatica will take part in the study, half of which will receive physiotherapy 2 weeks after seeing their G.P. The other half will receive physiotherapy at the usual time, around 6 weeks after seeing their G.P.

Detailed description

Sciatica is a relatively common problem which is often caused by nerve compression or irritation due to a lower back (Lumbar) disc prolapse. The problem is likely to improve in time as the body heals itself. However, this can take many months or sometime years. Sciatica can be a very painful condition, it may cause pins and needles, numbness or weakness in the legs affected. This, can cause great difficulty for people carrying out normal day to day activities. Physiotherapy is often used to help people with sciatica but in many places in the United Kingdom it can take many weeks or months to begin therapy. This study aims to see if having physiotherapy at 2 weeks after the patient has seen their G.P helps them get back to normal day to day function. This will be compared with another group of patients who will have physiotherapy at the 'usual' time of around 6 weeks after they have seen their G.P.The investigators will also be interviewing participants for their views of sciatica and physiotherapy. Each patient will receive a goal orientated physiotherapy management programme with achievement of those goals acting as secondary outcomes. Primary outcomes are feasibility objectives including patient recruitment rates, acceptability of outcome measures and intervention and rates of adverse events. This is a pilot study which means that the investigators won't be directly comparing the 2 groups, but seeing if doing a full-scale study in the future is going to be feasible.The investigators will do this by measuring several different things, such as whether patients want to take part in the study or not, whether the tests the investigators will perform are the right tests and to see if the patients and physiotherapists find the treatment useful.

Interventions

OTHERPhysiotherapy

The aims of physiotherapy are to promote physical and psychological health for the patient, and in doing so promote and improve function. In light of the evidence to suggest spontaneous resorption of the disc fragment occurs, physiotherapy provides support and guidance for the patient to manage their symptoms whilst resorption takes place. The physiotherapy regimen will be tailored to the individuals' requirements. It will be goal orientated, and assessed using a biopsychosocial approach based on 7 different elements; neurological dysfunction, motor control of movement of the lumbar spine and pelvis, movement restriction in the lumbar spine and pelvis, psychological barriers to recovery, advice and education, functional-based exercise and pain.

Sponsors

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Michael Reddington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 18-70 years of age with unilateral LRS defined as pain and or sensory disturbance and or weakness in a dermatomal and or myotomal distribution.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral LRS. * Patients with 'red flag' signs and symptoms of potential serious pathology. * Cancer at the time of the study. * Proven vascular claudication. * Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). * Spinal fracture within the last 3 months. * Chronic regional pain syndromes. * Recent lower limb fracture. * CVA with physical or psychiatric disability. * Poor English skills (necessitating the use of an interpreter and invalidating outcomes measures-ODI). * Other significant co-morbidities preventing regular attendance at physiotherapy clinics. * Patients with significant mental health problems for which treatment adherence may be difficult or psychologically disabling.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ensure patient safety52 weeksRecord all adverse and serious adverse events
Ability to recruit patients26 weeksAbility to recruit patients within the 26 week limit
Patients willing to be randomised26 weeksThe willingness of patients to be randomised will be collected together with reasons for not wanting to be randomised.
Ability to initiate treatment2 weeks for intervention arm, 6 weeks for controlDemonstrate the ability to organise physiotherapy appointments expeditiously

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeksself-rated disability 0/100
EQ5D-5LBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeksGeneral health measurement
Back & leg painBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeksSelf-reported back and leg pain
Goal achievement26 weeksPatient will rate whether their goal(s) have been achieved

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026