Skip to content

Fourier Transform of Videokeratography Data: Clinical Usefulness in Moderate and Frome Fruste Keratoconus

Fourier Transform of Videokeratography Data: Clinical Usefulness in Moderate and Frome Fruste Keratoconus

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02617368
Acronym
FFTKC
Enrollment
185
Registered
2015-12-01
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2015-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Keywords

Keratoconus, Corneal crosslinking, Fourier Analysis of Topographic Data

Brief summary

Primary objective of this study was evaluate the diagnostic capacity of fourier analysis of keratometric data in differentiating moderate KC and FFK from healthy corneas. Study participants were recruited from the Cornea Outpatient service in a consecutive if eligible basis. Two study groups were formed: a)KC group included patients those were diagnosed and classified for moderate keratoconus according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification system, b) FFK group (FFKG) that included patients diagnosed with FFK, and c) Control group (CG) was formed by refractive surgery candidates. Pentacam (Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany)measurements were performed by the same experienced operator in a consistent way.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Democritus University of Thrace
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of keratoconus KC in the fellow eye according to the Amsler-Krumleich criteria (FFKG) * KISA index between 60 and 100% in the FFK eye (FFKG) * lack of any KC-related findings / signs in the slit-lamp biomicroscopy (FFKG) * uneventful ophthalmologic history (CG) * no indications of corneal pathology in slit-lamp biomicroscopy and Placido \*disk-based videokeratography (CG) * KISA index value less than 60% (CG) * diagnosed and classified for moderate keratoconus according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification system (KCG)

Exclusion criteria

* for all study groups: * previous incisional eye surgery * corneal scars and opacities * history of herpetic keratitis, severe eye dryness * pregnancy or nursing * current corneal infection * glaucoma * suspicion for glaucoma * IOP lowering treatment * underlying autoimmune disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spherical Component (SphRmin)One DaySpherical Component (SphRmin) displays the arithmetic mean of all radii of curvature for each ring
Spherical Eccentricity (SphEcc)One DaySpherical Eccentricity is the asphericity that is calculated
Maximum Decentration (MaxDec)One Daydecentration or asymmetry of the astigmatic component which is derived from first order component of fourier analysis
Regular Astigmatism at the Center(AstC)One Daythe regular astigmatic component is calculated in the center and it is derived from the second order component of Fourier Analysis
Regular Astigmatism at the Periphery (AstP)One daythe regular astigmatic component is calculated in the periphery and it is derived from the second order component of Fourier Analysis
Mean Astigmatism (MAst)One DayMean Astigmatism is the average of astigmatism at the center and the periphery (MAst)
Irregularitiy (Irr)one Day
Astigmatism at the Center plus the Irregularities (AstCir)One daythe irregularities of the cornea which can not be corrected by sphere, cylinder or prism and it is derived from higher order components of Fourier Analysis of Keratometric Data
Total Astigmatism (Tast) which is the sum of Mean Astigmatism and Irregularities.One DayTotal Astigmatism (Tast) is the sum of Mean Astigmatism and Irregularities.

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026