Skip to content

Hepatic Resection Versus TACE+RFA for BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02616926
Enrollment
538
Registered
2015-11-30
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2015-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatectomy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation

Brief summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. For patients with intermediate HCC (BCLC stage B), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been recommended as the standard therapy in many clinical practice guidelines. The combination of TACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has also been reported as an effective treatment. However, more and more retrospective studies have reported better therapeutic efficacy of hepatic resection than TACE for intermediate HCC. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of hepatic resection versus TACE+RFA for the treatment of intermediate HCC through prospective randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the most widely used stage classification for HCC management. For patients with intermediate HCC, palliative treatment transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was recommended as first choice treatment. However, this recommendation remains controversial. The advice for diagnosis and treatment of HCC from former Chinese Ministry of Health indicated that BCLC may not be suitable in China as most HCC patients were found in intermediate or advanced stage. In recent years, more and more studies declared surgical resection as a better choice for HCC patients in BCLC stage B. However, lack of randomization, small sample size and lack of prospective studies limit the strength of evidence. To solve this dilemma, a prospective randomized control study was performed to compare the efficacy (1-, 2-, 3-year survival) between surgical resection group and TACE plus radiofrequency ablation group in HCC patients in intermediate stage. This study will provide powerful evidence regarding the better treatment option for HCC patients in BCLC B stage, which will benefit the treatment efficacy of HCC patients in BCLC B stage.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHepatic resection

Anatomical surgical resection of the liver including the tumor. Make sure the resection margin is negative during the process.

PROCEDURETACE

TACE will be performed according to the standard procedure of TACE and will be repeated every four months if needed

PROCEDURERFA

RFA will be performed 1 week after TACE.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hepatocellular Carcinoma diagnosed by biopsy or imaging criteria (CT/MRI) and AFP 2. Signed informed consent before registration on study 3. Child-Pugh class A or B 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status between 0 and 2. 5. BCLC stage B ( diameter of the single tumor ≥5cm or number of tumors ≥3) 6. Hepatitis B history or HBsAg positive 7. Age between 18 and 65 years 8. No previous treatment 9. Laboratory examination test: Platelet count ≥100×109/L; ALT/AST ≤ 3 x ULN; Cr1.5≤ x ULN; INR \< 1.5 or PT\< ULN +4s; Alb≥30g/L; Tbil≤34mmol/L 10. For patients in Hepatic resection group: radical surgery will be performed: (1) No segmental, lobar or main portal vein and bile duct thrombosis; (2) no lymph nodes metastasis; (3) no extra hepatic metastasis.

Exclusion criteria

1. cachexia or poor physical condition; 2. pregnant or HCG positive; 3. Portal vein and bile duct thrombosis or with extra hepatic metastasis. 4. Uncontrolled or refractory ascites or history of hepatic encephalopathy 5. Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases 6. hemophilia or patients with coumarin derivative therapy. 7. .history of organ transplantation or mental disease. 8. Be allergic to adriamycin, lobaplatin, mitomycin or iodized oil

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival3 yearscompare 3-year overall survival between the two arms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disease free survival3 yearscompare 3-year disease free survival between the two arms

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactBaogang Peng, MD
pengbaogang@medmail.com.cn020-87755766-8214
Backup ContactShunli Shen, MD
shunlishen@163.com020-87755766-8214

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026