Glaucoma, Angle-Closure
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a 10-centre randomized controlled clinical trial to explore whether laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPIP) plus laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is more effective than single LPI to control the progression of primary angle closure with multi-mechanism based on the UBM classification.
Interventions
DEVICEneodymium:yttrium-aluminum- garnet laser
a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum- garnet laser was used to perform the LPI
DEVICEfrequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet 532-nm laser
a frequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet 532-nm laser was used to perform the LPIP
DRUGPilocarpine
30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered
PROCEDURELPIP plus LPI
LPIP was applied with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia will be administered. Twenty to 30 spots of 250-300 mW power with 300-500 microns of size and duration of 400-500 ms were applied. Power was modified arbitrarily until an effective iris contraction was obtained. Effective iris contraction was considered as a concentric movement around the laser spot, with minimal iris pigmentation and immediate angle opening observed through the lens mirrors using a Goldmann lens. Power was lowered if there was any bursting sound perceived, pigment dispersion, air bubbles or considerable pain. LPI was performed after LPIP procedure.
DRUGProparacaine
30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered
PROCEDURELPI
LPI was performed with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered. The treatment site was selected in the superior nasal iris or in a crypt, where present. Treatment was initiated with a pulse of 3-5mJ, the power was increased until patency was achieved, the opening of iris \>0.1mm. and patency was determined by direct visualization of the posterior chamber.
Sponsors
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Wenzhou Medical University
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
The Third Hospital of HanDan
Third Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University
Central South University
He University
Hebei Provincial Eye Hospital
Sun Yat-sen University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Clinical diagnosis of primary angle closure (PAC), with IOP≤30mmHg and PAS≤270°. 2. PAC with multi-mechanism based on UBM examination (multi-mechanism is defined as primary angle closure is caused by pupil block plus at least one kind of non-pupil block factors like (relative anterior position and thick of the ciliary body, the big volume of the iris, the anterior location of the iris insertion into the ciliary body)or any two or more kinds of combination. 3. Visual acuity≥ 20/40 4. Age between 40-75 years old Chinese people If both eyes of a patient are eligible for the study, the e eye had worse visual acuity will be selected. Only one eye per patient is eligible for the study. Drug washout: Eligible patients who are already on anti-glaucoma medications are required to have drug washout before being randomized. Various medications have different washout periods: Prostaglandin analogues 4 weeks, Beta blockers 3 weeks, Adrenergic agonist 2 weeks, Cholinergic agonist 5 days, Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors 5 days. Patients whose IOP\>30 mm Hg during this washout period will be stopped from further washout and be withdrawn from the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Unwilling or unable to give consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits. 2. Angle closure due to secondary causes (subluxed lens, neovascular, uveitic, traumatic, post-operative) 3. Previous incisional intraocular surgery or ocular laser in study eye (LPI or LPIP, cyclodestructive procedure, cataract surgery) 4. Primary angle closure with glaucomatous neuropathy. 5. Have cataract in the studying eye and anticipated to have cataract surgery in the coming 3 years; the existing cataract affect visual field examination and fundus examination; the visual acuity \<20/40 due to the existing cataract. 6. Who are using IOP lowing drugs and do not have drug washout 7. Need for glaucoma surgery combined with other ocular procedures (i.e. cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, or retinal surgery) or anticipated need for urgent additional ocular surgery 8. Coexisting other ocular diseases (i.e. cornea abnormal or cornea infection, Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome or anterior segment dysgenesis, nanophthalmos, high myopia (\>6.0D), Chronic or recurrent uveitis, ocular cancer, trauma, central retinal vein occlusion, central retinal artery occlusion, retinal detachment) 9. cornea endothelium counting \<1000/mm2 10. need local or systemic steroid long-term use 11. Unwilling to discontinue contact lens use after surgery 12. Who are taking parting in other drug clinical trials 13. Pregnant or nursing women 14. Severe systemic disease (i.e. diabetes mellitus, hypertension, the end stage of cardiac disease, nephropathy disease, respiratory disease and cancer. 15. Allergic to pilocarpine or alcaine 16. Contraindication to ocular laser diseases.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression rate determined by number of patients who progress after laser treatment for each group. | 3 years | PAC progression defined as presence of any of the following: 1. Acute angle closure crisis 2. Intraocular (IOP) was 8mmHg higher than initiation 1 month after the laser procedure 3. IOP was ≥22mmHg when measured three times of continuous 1 month after the lase procedure 4. The progression of peripheral anterior synechiae ≥ 1 clock hour within 3 years after the laser procedure as measured by gonioscopic examination. 5. glaucomatous neuropathy within 3 years after the laser procedure |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Additional medication or surgery required questionnaire | 3 years | 1. the medication required to control the IOP 2. the additional surgery required to control the progression of the PAC |
| The change of the best corrected visual acuity after the laser procedure | 3 years | — |
| The number of the cornea endothelial cells | 3 years | — |
| The change in angle width and configuration as measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) | 3 years | — |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary Contactxiulan zhang, MD,PhD
Outcome results
None listed