Skip to content

Open-Label and Single-Arm Study of MYOBLOC® in the Treatment of Troublesome Sialorrhea in Adults

A Phase 3, Long-Term, Open-Label and Single-Arm Study of MYOBLOC® in the Treatment of Troublesome Sialorrhea in Adult Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02610868
Acronym
OPTIMYST
Enrollment
187
Registered
2015-11-20
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
2017-06-01
Last updated
2026-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sialorrhea

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy, ALS, Stroke, Neuroleptics

Brief summary

Multicenter, open-label, outpatient study of the safety and effectiveness of repeated doses of MYOBLOC over a 1-year duration in adult subjects with troublesome sialorrhea.

Detailed description

Multicenter, open-label, outpatient study of the safety and effectiveness of repeated doses of MYOBLOC over a 1-year duration in adult subjects with troublesome sialorrhea. The primary goal is to determine the long-term safety and tolerability of MYOBLOC (administered intraglandularly as single total dose of 3,500 Units) treatments every 13 weeks over a maximum possible duration of 1 year in adult subjects with troublesome sialorrhea. The secondary goal is to assess the magnitude of therapeutic response of MYOBLOC (administered intraglandularly as a single total dose of 3,500 Units) using effectiveness assessments performed at intervals after treatments every 13 weeks over a maximum possible duration of 1 year.

Interventions

After a screening period (up to 21 days), subjects who satisfy all eligibility criteria may receive single dose injections of 3,500 Units of MYOBLOC every 13 weeks (±2 weeks) for a total of 4 treatments via injections into the submandibular and parotid glands. Subjects will undergo safety and effectiveness assessments at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 17, 26, 30, 39, 43, and 52, and telephone follow up will occur at Weeks 21, 34, and 47

Sponsors

Solstice Neurosciences, LLC, a subsidiary of US WorldMeds, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Seeking treatment for troublesome sialorrhea for at least 3 months that is occurring secondary to any disorder or related to any cause, including, but not limited to, Parkinson's Disease (PD), adult cerebral palsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), stroke, traumatic brain injury, oral cancer, and side effects of other medications. * Able to read and provide written informed consent before enrollment into the study, or the subject's caregiver (Legally Authorized Representative) can provide written informed consent. * Male or female, 18 to 85 years of age (inclusive). * Minimum unstimulated salivary flow rate of 0.2 g/min at screening * Minimum Investigator's Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale (DFSS) score of 4 at screening. * Ability and availability to participate in the study for up to 1 year (ALS subjects: ability and availability to participate in the study for at least 6 months), based on overall health of the subject and disease prognosis

Exclusion criteria

* A moderate to high risk of aspiration will exclude participation in this study. Subjects whose risk of aspiration are judged by the Investigator to be satisfactorily controlled by placement of PEG tube or G-tube for nutritional support are eligible to participate. * Respiratory forced vital capacity (FVC) of \<20% of predicted * Prior botulinum toxin type A or B treatment in the salivary gland(s) identified for treatment in this study within 24 weeks before screening. Prior botulinum toxin type A or B treatment into other anatomical regions not selected for treatment in this study is not exclusionary, but must have occurred at least 12 weeks before screening * Subjects should be excluded if, in the Investigator's opinion, the subject failed to respond to previous treatment with botulinum toxin. Subjects should not receive nor have any plans for receiving any botulinum toxin treatment, other than the study drug (MYOBLOC), during the entire course of the study (from the point the informed consent is signed until subject's participation is complete). * Concomitant use, or exposure within 5 half-lives of screening, of aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents, or other agents that interfere with neuromuscular function * Prior salivary gland surgery * Current treatment or treatment at any time during the study with Coumadin® (warfarin) or similar anti-coagulant medications. Anti-platelet medications are not specifically exclusionary * Evidence of any clinically significant neurologic disease * Pregnancy or lactation * Anticipated or scheduled surgery during the study period. A PEG tube/G tube may be placed for nutritional support at any time during the study and will not exclude the subject from continued study participation. * Major surgery (requiring general anesthesia, except PEG tube/G tube placement ) within the previous 6 months before screening. * Current infection at the sialorrhea treatment injection site(s) * History of drug or alcohol abuse currently or within the previous 6 months * Participation in another clinical drug, device, or biological agent study within 30 days of screening or while participating in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Visits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1TEAEs Related to Study Medication include TEAEs classified as Possibly, Probably and Definitely Related. Treatment Session (TS)
Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Visits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1Treatment Session (TS) AESI includes: Aspiration, Aspirational pneumonia, Choking and Dysphagia.
Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresBaseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because one participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed. All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).
Occurrence of Dental Adverse EventsVisits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1Treatment Session (TS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13For Treatment Sessions 2-4, the change from baseline is calculated using the Week 13 value from the previous Treatment Session as the new baseline. Week 8 was only assessed in Treatment Session 1. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13CGI-S will be used to record the severity of illness (sialorrhea) on a 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, "normal" to a score of 7, "among the most extremely ill patients". Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13CGI-C will be used to record change or improvement of illness (sialorrhea) on a 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, "very much improved" to a score of 7, "very much worse". Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. Treatment Session (TS)
Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13The DFSS will be used to assess the frequency and severity of drooling on a 5-point scale ranging from a score of 1, dry never drools to a score of 5, profuse clothing hands tray objects become wet. Drooling frequency will be assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, never drools to a score of 4, constantly drools. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. The severity score and frequency score are summed together to create the DFSS total score (range 2-9). A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13The DFSS will be used to assess the frequency and severity of drooling on a 5-point scale ranging from a score of 1, dry never drools to a score of 5, profuse clothing hands tray objects become wet. Drooling frequency will be assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, never drools to a score of 4, constantly drools. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit. The severity score and frequency score are summed together to create the DFSS total score (range 2 -9). A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13The PGI-S scale will be used by the subject to rate the severity of his/her illness (sialorrhea) on an 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, "normal" to a score of 7, "among the most extremely ill". Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13The PGI-C scale will be used by the subject to rate the change in symptoms of his/her illness (sialorrhea) on an 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, "very much improved" to a score of 7, "very much worse". Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.
Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13The DIS is a 10-item questionnaire with each item rated by the subject to evaluate the impact of sialorrhea on daily activities (e.g., speech, social activities). Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit. Subject is requested to compare their current status to their last study visit using a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, not at all to a score of 4, very much. The DIS total score ranges from 10 to 40. A negative change from baseline indicates a positive clinical outcome.

Countries

Belarus, Ukraine, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJonathan Rubin, PhD

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MYOBLOC
MYOBLOC: After a screening period (up to 21 days), subjects who satisfy all eligibility criteria may receive single dose injections of 3,500 Units of MYOBLOC every 13 weeks (±2 weeks) for a total of 4 treatments via injections into the submandibular and parotid glands. Subjects will undergo safety and effectiveness assessments at Weeks 4, 8, 13 for Treatment Session 1; Weeks 4, 13 for Treatment Sessions 2-4. All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).
187
Total187

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMYOBLOC
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
102 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
85 Participants
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)4.4 units on a scale (1-7)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)5.3 units on a scale (1-7)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
175 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belarus
39 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
80 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
68 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
129 Participants
Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR)0.6322 g/minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4918

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1874 / 1772 / 501 / 248 / 187
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 18734 / 1777 / 504 / 2473 / 187
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 18718 / 1774 / 502 / 2433 / 187

Outcome results

Primary

Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity Scores

Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because one participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed. All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Session 1Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation2 participants
Treatment Session 1Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 2Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation2 participants
Treatment Session 2Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 3Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 3Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation1 participants
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Ideation0 participants
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Columbia Suicide Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation, Behavior Scores and Intensity ScoresSuicidal Behavior0 participants
Primary

Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

Treatment Session (TS) AESI includes: Aspiration, Aspirational pneumonia, Choking and Dysphagia.

Time frame: Visits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Session 1Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspiration0 participants
Treatment Session 1Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspirational pneumonia0 participants
Treatment Session 1Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Choking0 participants
Treatment Session 1Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Dysphagia4 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspirational pneumonia1 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Choking0 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Dysphagia0 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspiration1 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Choking0 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspirational pneumonia0 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Dysphagia0 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspiration0 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Dysphagia0 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspirational pneumonia0 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Aspiration0 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Choking0 participants
Primary

Occurrence of Dental Adverse Events

Treatment Session (TS)

Time frame: Visits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Session 1Occurrence of Dental Adverse Events27 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence of Dental Adverse Events23 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence of Dental Adverse Events8 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence of Dental Adverse Events2 participants
Primary

Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

TEAEs Related to Study Medication include TEAEs classified as Possibly, Probably and Definitely Related. Treatment Session (TS)

Time frame: Visits at Weeks 4 and 13 combined for each TS; including Visit at Week 8 for TS1

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U or 3000 U).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Session 1Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAEs7 participants
Treatment Session 1Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)TEAEs Related to Study Medication42 participants
Treatment Session 1Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Severe TEAEs5 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAEs14 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)TEAEs Related to Study Medication26 participants
Treatment Session 2Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Severe TEAEs8 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Severe TEAEs2 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAEs3 participants
Treatment Session 3Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)TEAEs Related to Study Medication4 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious TEAEs2 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)TEAEs Related to Study Medication2 participants
Treatment Session 4Occurrence, Seriousness, Severity, and Causality Assessment of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Severe TEAEs2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

CGI-S will be used to record the severity of illness (sialorrhea) on a 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, normal to a score of 7, among the most extremely ill patients. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
p-value: 0.313ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1054ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0002ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1663ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)

The DFSS will be used to assess the frequency and severity of drooling on a 5-point scale ranging from a score of 1, dry never drools to a score of 5, profuse clothing hands tray objects become wet. Drooling frequency will be assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, never drools to a score of 4, constantly drools. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit. The severity score and frequency score are summed together to create the DFSS total score (range 2 -9). A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Subject (DFSS-S)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0003ANCOVA
p-value: 0.9016ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0753ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4992ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)

The DFSS will be used to assess the frequency and severity of drooling on a 5-point scale ranging from a score of 1, dry never drools to a score of 5, profuse clothing hands tray objects become wet. Drooling frequency will be assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, never drools to a score of 4, constantly drools. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. The severity score and frequency score are summed together to create the DFSS total score (range 2-9). A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Frequency and Severity Scale Performed by Trained Assessor (DFSS-I)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.11ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 1ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.029ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)

The DIS is a 10-item questionnaire with each item rated by the subject to evaluate the impact of sialorrhea on daily activities (e.g., speech, social activities). Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit. Subject is requested to compare their current status to their last study visit using a 4-point scale ranging from a score of 1, not at all to a score of 4, very much. The DIS total score ranges from 10 to 40. A negative change from baseline indicates a positive clinical outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.33
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.17
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Drooling Impact Score (DIS)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.3786ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.7787ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.3825ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The PGI-S scale will be used by the subject to rate the severity of his/her illness (sialorrhea) on an 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, normal to a score of 7, among the most extremely ill. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-1.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.548
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-1.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.461
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.364
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-0.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.303
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.245
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.248
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.242
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.279
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.251
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4567ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8115ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.3282ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4

For Treatment Sessions 2-4, the change from baseline is calculated using the Week 13 value from the previous Treatment Session as the new baseline. Week 8 was only assessed in Treatment Session 1. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because patient data was not always captured for each endpoint at every visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) of each TS to the following: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.3424 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.3685
Treatment Session 2Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.2771 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.3144
Treatment Session 3Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.1357 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.2888
Treatment Session 4Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.2272 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.2668
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.0560 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.2067
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.1797 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.1975
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.0547 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.2269
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.1592 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.2305
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (USFR): Treatment Sessions 1-4-0.0335 g/minuteStandard Deviation 0.1378
p-value: 0.2569ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0006ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1131ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0026ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)

CGI-C will be used to record change or improvement of illness (sialorrhea) on a 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, very much improved to a score of 7, very much worse. Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit. Treatment Session (TS)

Time frame: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Treatment Session 2Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Treatment Session 3Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Treatment Session 4Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

The PGI-C scale will be used by the subject to rate the change in symptoms of his/her illness (sialorrhea) on an 7-point scale ranging from a score of 1, very much improved to a score of 7, very much worse. Treatment Session (TS) Participants Analyzed does not match the Participant Flow because participant discontinued prior to the first post-injection visit.

Time frame: TS1 Visits at Weeks 4, 8, 13; TS2-4 Visits at Weeks 4, 13

Population: Per protocol participants were only required to complete two treatment sessions with a maximum of 4 treatment sessions allowed.~All subjects received 3500 U doses except for 13 subjects who had decreased doses at Treatment Session 2 and/or 3 (2500 U to 3000 U).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Treatment Session 2Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Treatment Session 3Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Treatment Session 4Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Treatment Session 2: Week 13Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Treatment Session 3: Week 4Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Treatment Session 3: Week 13Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Treatment Session 4: Week 4Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Treatment Session 4: Week 13Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 22, 2026