Skip to content

Accu-Chek® CONNECT at School (CATS) Pediatric Study

Accu-Chek® CONNECT at School (CATS) Pediatric Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02609633
Acronym
CATS
Enrollment
196
Registered
2015-11-20
Start date
2015-12-28
Completion date
2017-01-20
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Brief summary

This interventional, 6-month post-marketing study is designed to evaluate the change in diabetes-related distress among parents/caregivers of school-age children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who are receiving multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. Investigational sites will be assigned using cluster randomization, with approximately 10 to 20 children at each site. In order to maintain a true control group for comparison, the investigational sites will be randomly assigned to the Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System (DMS) or usual care/continued use of current DMS devices.

Interventions

DEVICEAccu-Chek® CONNECT DMS

SMBG will be performed during the 6-month study using the Accu-Chek® Aviva CONNECT monitoring device, and corresponding Smartphone app and online tracking tool.

DEVICEDMS

SMBG will be performed during the 6-month study according to usual care, using the participant's current DMS (other than Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMS).

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children or adolescents, aged 6 to 18 years * Diagnosis of T1D for at least 3 months * Currently managed with insulin Multiple Daily Injection (MDI) therapy * Attending full-day school schedule in Grade K through 12 * Able to provide SMBG data minimum of one month prior to study start * Currently using a compatible Smartphone with ability to download the Accu-Chek® CONNECT System App accordingly OR ability to utilize Smartphone and Accu-Chek® CONNECT System App as provided for use in study * Adolescents (18 years) with diabetes provide written informed consent * Children 7 to 17 years to provide age-appropriate child assent * Parent/caregiver currently using a compatible Smartphone with ability to receive Short Message Service/Multimedia Messaging Service (SMS/MMS) messages * Able to read/write in English and comply with study procedures, including provision of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) data at least 1 month prior to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Current or planned use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions during the study period * Use of continuous glucose monitoring or a remote data-sharing system/device (i.e. NightScout, DexCom Share, Medtronic Connect) during the study * Pregnancy * Clinically significant medical condition(s) such as anemia, major organ system disease, infection, psychosis, or cognitive impairment * Requirement for chronic steroids, immunomodulatory medication, or chemotherapy in adrenal suppressive doses * Visual impairment preventing use of the Accu-Chek® CONNECT system * Parent/caregiver is an investigator, general practitioner, practice staff, pharmacist, research assistant, or other staff or relative of those directly involved in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Child and Teen (C&T) Parent Questionnaire Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.
Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6The DFCS Questionnaire has 19 questions, each question ranges in response values between 1 (Almost Never) and 3 (Almost Always). The derived total score (19 questions) ranges between 19 and 57, where higher score indicates worsened condition. This questionnaire was answered by Children/adolescents and Parents.
Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6The BGMC Questionnaire has 8 questions, each question ranges in response values from 1 (Almost Never) to 3 (Almost Always). The derived total score ranges between 8 and 24, where higher score indicates worsened condition.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6Assessment of HbA1c is an indicator of long-term control of diabetes.
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeBaseline, Months 3 and 6The percentage of target range measurements was defined as the number of within target range readings in the interval divided by the total number of BG checks in the interval.
Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3Baseline, Month 3The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6A measurement was defined as hypoglycemic if the glucose value was below 70 mg/dl or below 60 mg/dl or below 50 mg/dl.
Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityMonth 6Percentage of participants who frequently used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System (blood sugar meter \[BSM\], phone application \[PA\] and web portal \[WP\]) according to the questionnaire about usability answered by children/adolescents and Parent were reported. Here, in parent post questionnaire for usability the sum of percentages are not equal to 100%, because percentage is based on n=44.
Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessMonth 6Participants preference the Accu-Chek® CONNECT process compared with previous technology/process assessed by questionnaire including following questions; Q 1: Felt more sure of myself using the system, Q 2: Less worried about low BG than used to be, Q 3: Would rather use the system than what used before, Q 4: Felt safer managing diabetes using system than what used before, Q 5: Friends with diabetes should also use the system. Questionnaire was answered by children/adolescents and parents. Here, in children/adolescents post questionnaire for preference the percentage sum is not equal to 100%, because percentage is based on n=41.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a QuestionnaireMonth 6Percentage of participants with overall treatment satisfaction with the use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management system according to the questionnaire answered by children/adolescents and parents were reported.
Change From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3 and 6Glycemic variability, expressed as mean of all blood glucose(BG) readings per subject within the interval. BG variability was defined as standard deviation (SD) of all glucose readings over the interval.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Families of participants were identified and recruited from the investigators' established participant populations or from the participant populations of other physicians within the group practice, using protocol-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Pre-assignment details

Although a total of 196 parents and children/adolescents were enrolled, only the 98 children/adolescents were considered participants in the study. Baseline and adverse events data were only collected for children/adolescents.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)
Participants of enrolled families continued to use their self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for 6 months using the current DMS device.
32
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMS
Participants of enrolled families who used Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMS for 6 months.
46
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn01
Overall StudyNon-Compliant with Study Procedures20
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation10
Overall StudyReason not Specified21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSTotal
Age, Continuous13.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.06
12.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.03
12.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.04
Diabetes-Related Distress According to the PAID Child and Teen (C&T) Parent Questionnaire Score66.2 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.72
71.1 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.53
69.1 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic/latino:No
30 Participants42 Participants72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic/latino:Yes
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
24 Participants34 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants24 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants22 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 426 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 422 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Child and Teen (C&T) Parent Questionnaire Score at Month 6

The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Child and Teen (C&T) Parent Questionnaire Score at Month 6-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.82
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Child and Teen (C&T) Parent Questionnaire Score at Month 6-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6

Glycemic variability, expressed as mean of all blood glucose(BG) readings per subject within the interval. BG variability was defined as standard deviation (SD) of all glucose readings over the interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline94.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 30.84
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3-1.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 30.47
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 62.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 20.39
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline99.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 32.38
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3-2.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 21.78
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline Blood Glucose Variability Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6-3.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 23.48
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6

The BGMC Questionnaire has 8 questions, each question ranges in response values from 1 (Almost Never) to 3 (Almost Always). The derived total score ranges between 8 and 24, where higher score indicates worsened condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Score Change at Month 6-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Score at Baseline12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.01
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Change Score at Month 3-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Change Score at Month 6-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.09
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Score at Baseline14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.45
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Change Score at Month 30.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Score at Baseline14.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Score Change at Month 6-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.39
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Change Score at Month 6-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Score at Baseline13.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parents/Caregivers BGMC Change Score at Month 3-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Affect Towards Blood Glucose Monitoring Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Blood Glucose Monitoring Communication (BGMC) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/Adolescents BGMC Change Score at Month 3-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3

The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3Baseline65.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.42
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3Change at Month 34.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.06
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3Baseline70.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.14
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among Parents/Caregivers According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3Change at Month 3-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6

The PAID Questionnaire encompassed 26 items. Score for each question ranges from 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Big Problem (Child version) or 1-2 = Not a Problem to 5-6 = Serious Problem (Teen or Parent versions). The derived total score (26 questions) ranges between 26 and 156, where higher score indicates worsened condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Baseline53.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.85
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Change at Months 3-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.89
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Change at Months 6-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Baseline62.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.44
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Change at Months 31.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.44
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Diabetes-Related Distress Among School-age Children/Adolescents and Adolescents According to the PAID C&T Child Questionnaire Score at Month 3 and 6Change at Months 6-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6

Assessment of HbA1c is an indicator of long-term control of diabetes.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline9.3 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.81
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3-0.1 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.94
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6-0.1 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.1
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Baseline9.1 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.8
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3-0.1 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.25
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6-0.1 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6

The DFCS Questionnaire has 19 questions, each question ranges in response values between 1 (Almost Never) and 3 (Almost Always). The derived total score (19 questions) ranges between 19 and 57, where higher score indicates worsened condition. This questionnaire was answered by Children/adolescents and Parents.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. The number analysed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Score at Baseline28.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.54
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Change Score at Month 30.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Change Score at Month 6-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.09
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Score at Baseline27.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.13
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Change Score at Month 3-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.02
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Change Score at Month 6-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Change Score at Month 3-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.15
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Score at Baseline30.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Score at Baseline27.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.37
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Change Score at Month 3-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.37
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Parent/Caregiver DFCS Change Score at Month 6-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Perceived Family Conflict Among School-Age Children With Diabetes and Parent/Caregiver According to Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (DFCS) Parent Questionnaire Score at Months 3 and 6Children/adolescents DFCS Change Score at Month 6-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target Range

The percentage of target range measurements was defined as the number of within target range readings in the interval divided by the total number of BG checks in the interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. The number analysed is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Baseline39.0 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 18.91
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Change at Month 3-3.9 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 25.56
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Change at Month 6-4.8 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 22.13
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Baseline41.4 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 19.03
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Change at Month 3-4.6 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 25.6
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Change at Month 6-4.2 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 22.68
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Change at Month 33.8 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 12.99
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Baseline30.0 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 19.42
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Baseline31.9 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 20.26
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Change at Month 32.8 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 12.46
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 80-180 mg/dl: Change at Month 61.4 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 14.96
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Blood Glucose (BG) Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6 Within Glucose Target RangeTarget Range 70-160 mg/dl: Change at Month 60.5 percentage of blood glucose measurementsStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6

A measurement was defined as hypoglycemic if the glucose value was below 70 mg/dl or below 60 mg/dl or below 50 mg/dl.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3 and 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analysed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl) Change at Months 31.7 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 7.07
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Change at Month 30.8 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 5.03
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl): Baseline4.4 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 6.2
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Baseline1.0 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 2.76
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl): Change at Months 61.3 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 6.22
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Change at Month 3-0.4 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 3.08
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Change at Month 60.5 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 5.1
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Change at Month 60.1 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 3.21
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Change From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Baseline2.2 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 4.28
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Change at Month 6-0.6 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 3.98
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl): Baseline5.4 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 6.64
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl) Change at Months 30.1 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 7.55
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl): Change at Months 61.6 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 9.04
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Baseline2.8 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 4.64
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Change at Month 60.1 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 6.37
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Baseline1.4 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 3.45
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 50 mg/dl): Change at Month 3-0.5 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 3.74
Interventional: Accu-Chek® CONNECT DMSChange From Baseline in Percentage of Hypoglycemic BG Measurements Among School-Age Children With Diabetes at Months 3 and 6Hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl): Change at Month 3-0.0 percentage of hypoglycemic measurementsStandard Deviation 5.53
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About Usability

Percentage of participants who frequently used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System (blood sugar meter \[BSM\], phone application \[PA\] and web portal \[WP\]) according to the questionnaire about usability answered by children/adolescents and Parent were reported. Here, in parent post questionnaire for usability the sum of percentages are not equal to 100%, because percentage is based on n=44.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analyzed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: PA - Frequently Used78.0 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: PA - Frequently Not Used18.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: WP - Frequently Not Used43.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: BSM - Frequently Used97.6 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: BSM - Frequently Not Used2.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: PA - Frequently Not Used22.0 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: WP - Frequently Used36.6 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityChildren/Adolescents: WP - Frequently Not Used63.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: BSM - Frequently Used86.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: BSM - Frequently Not Used13.6 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: PA - Frequently Used79.5 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants Who Frequently Used Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire About UsabilityParents: WP - Frequently Used47.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a Questionnaire

Percentage of participants with overall treatment satisfaction with the use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management system according to the questionnaire answered by children/adolescents and parents were reported.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'Number analyzed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a QuestionnaireChildren/adolescents: Satisfied87.8 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a QuestionnaireChildren/adolescents: Not Satisfied9.8 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a QuestionnaireParent: Satisfied88.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Overall Treatment Satisfaction With the Use of Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System According to a QuestionnaireParent: Not Satisfied4.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/Process

Participants preference the Accu-Chek® CONNECT process compared with previous technology/process assessed by questionnaire including following questions; Q 1: Felt more sure of myself using the system, Q 2: Less worried about low BG than used to be, Q 3: Would rather use the system than what used before, Q 4: Felt safer managing diabetes using system than what used before, Q 5: Friends with diabetes should also use the system. Questionnaire was answered by children/adolescents and parents. Here, in children/adolescents post questionnaire for preference the percentage sum is not equal to 100%, because percentage is based on n=41.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The FAS included all eligible families that have signed an informed consent and completed (with the acceptable level of missing questions to calculate a total score) all questions on the PAID Parent (YP or TP) Questionnaire at both baseline and Visit 4. Here, 'number analyzed' is the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 4- Mostly Agree90.9 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 1- Mostly Agree90.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 1- Mostly Disagree7.3 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 2- Mostly Agree90.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 2- Mostly Disagree9.8 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 3- Mostly Agree90.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 3- Mostly Disagree9.8 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 4- Mostly Agree90.2 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 4- Mostly Disagree9.8 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 5- Mostly Agree85.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessChildren/Adolescents: Q 5- Mostly Disagree14.6 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 1- Mostly Agree90.9 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 1- Mostly Disagree9.1 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 2- Mostly Agree88.6 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 2- Mostly Disagree11.4 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 3- Mostly Agree90.9 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 3- Mostly Disagree9.1 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 4- Mostly Disagree9.1 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 5- Mostly Agree95.5 percentage of participants
Control: Usual Care - Current Diabetes Management System (DMS)Percentage of Participants With Participants Preference for Accu-Chek® CONNECT Diabetes Management System With Previous Technology/ProcessParent: Q 5- Mostly Disagree4.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026