Skip to content

Improving Cancer-Related Outcomes in Shift Workers

Improving Cancer-Related Outcomes in Shift Workers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02609373
Acronym
ICOS
Enrollment
47
Registered
2015-11-20
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

shiftwork, sleep hygiene, prevention, intervention, occupational, biological, breast cancer, lifestyle

Brief summary

Shift work with circadian disruption has been linked with increased breast cancer incidence. The mechanisms for this effect are not yet completely understood. This study evaluates the impact of a previously developed sleep intervention in shift workers at risk of breast cancer; and assesses mediating variables that may explain the relationship between shift work and breast cancer. A sample of women night shift workers were provided with a sleep intervention. The intervention is a standard approach used in a sleep clinic and is delivered by telephone by a trained intervener. Hypothesis: The intervention will improve sleep in women night shift workers, which will in turn have a positive impact on biological and behavioural risk factors associated with breast cancer and quality of life.

Detailed description

47 female night shift workers completed a sleep intervention. The intervention follows an established sleep therapy protocol. Assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months include mammographic density and possible mediating variables known to be linked to breast cancer risk including behavioural, biometric, and biological measures. Behavioural and self-report measures of sleep quality and physical activity are assessed as well as self-reported chronotype and quality of life. The intervention is a multi-session intervention using cognitive behavioural principles to increase healthy sleep by addressing a variety of behaviours that may influence sleep quality and quantity, based an established telephone-based protocol used at the UBC Hospital Sleep Disorders Clinic. It includes 10 telephone sessions spaced over a 6-month period, and 2 additional booster sessions at 8 and 10 months. Participants are given a sleep diary at baseline to complete for 2 weeks before the sleep hygiene telephone counseling session begins. The intervention protocol incorporates sleep assessment, maintaining a sleep diary and use of an actiwatch (to measure sleep and physical activity), sleep hygiene (i.e., controlling behavioural and environmental factors that affect sleep), stimulus control therapy (i.e., teaching individuals how to eliminate behaviours that are incompatible with sleep), sleep restriction therapy (i.e., teaching how to limit time in bed to time asleep), cognitive restructuring (i.e., modifying non-adaptive thoughts and triggers for insomnia), and relapse prevention. The structured counseling protocol includes concrete exercises and activities, questions and answers, and problem solving strategies. Medication use is not part of this protocol; if participants wish to explore pharmacologic approaches, they are advised to consult with their physicians. Although some shift workers have received care from the Sleep Clinic in the past, there has not been a systematic focus on this group. The project manager conducts a telephone-based evaluation of the intervention 6 months post-sleep intervention. Blood and salivary samples are collected using standardized data collection methods at baseline, 6, and 12 months, and mammographic films are collected at baseline and 12 months.

Interventions

Session 1: Intervener & participant review 2-week sleep diary and actigraph data. Provide individualized sleep hygiene prescription. Session 2: Review sleep diary; calculate sleep efficiency; identify adjustments needed. Session 3: Review sleep-related vs. stress-related symptoms. Develop plan for sleep-related symptoms and discuss Sleep Restriction with Relaxation Exercises. Session 4: Reinforce progress and make corrections as required. If Sleep Restriction is not working, Stimulus Control is introduced. Session 5-10: Provide reinforcement, assess adherence, answer questions, and offer encouragement and monitoring, including alterations as required. Booster sessions: At 8 & 10 months: reinforcement, question answering, encouragement and monitoring.

Sponsors

Canadian Cancer Society (CCS)
CollaboratorOTHER
University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 40-65 years * Working or living in Greater Vancouver Area * Read and understand English * Work rotating or permanent night shift at least 3 times per month, for at least 2 years * Received a screening mammogram within the past 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* History of breast cancer * On active cancer therapy for any cancer * Pregnant * Diabetes requiring drug treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in sleep qualityBaseline, 6 monthsSelf-reported good sleep quality at baseline and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in melatoninBaseline, 6 monthsChange in melatonin at baseline and 6 months
Change in cortisolBaseline, 6 monthsChange in cortisol at baseline and 6 months
Change in breast densityBaseline, 12 monthsChange in breast density at baseline and 12 months
Change in IGF-1 and IGFBP 1,2,3,7Baseline, 6 monthsChange in IGF-1 and IGFBP 1,2,3,7 at baseline and 6 months
Change in Vitamin DBaseline, 6 monthsChange in Vitamin D at baseline and 6 months
Change in C-reactive proteinBaseline, 6 monthsChange in C-reactive protein from baseline to 6 months
Change in glucoseBaseline, 6 monthsChange in glucose from baseline to 6 months
Change in quality of lifeBaseline, 6 monthsChange in quality of life from baseline to 6 months
Intervention Evaluation12 monthsParticipant satisfaction and perceptions of intervention assessed by semi-structured telephone interview
Change in sleep quality6 months, 12 monthsSelf-reported good sleep quality at 6 and 12 months
Change in health and lifestyleBaseline, 6 monthsChange in self-reported health and lifestyle assessed by structured questionnaire at baseline and 6 months
Change in insulinBaseline, 6 monthsChange in insulin from baseline to 6 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance between self-reported sleep quality and other indicatorsBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsComparison of ratings between self-reports, diary data, and actigraph readings at all time points

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026