Skip to content

Determining Equivalence Dose for Oral Versus Sublingual Administration of Tacrolimus in Hepatic Receptors

Determining Equivalence Dose for Oral Versus Sublingual Administration of Tacrolimus in Hepatic Receptors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02608606
Acronym
FKosl
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-11-20
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effects of Immunosuppressant Therapy, Evidence of Liver Transplantation

Brief summary

After liver transplantation one of the most important cost, for both patients and their health insurance system, is immunosuppressive drug therapy. Tacrolimus (FK 506) is considered the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. Oral administration is the usual route, however, sublingual (SL) administration has been recently reported. This method of administration avoids first pass metabolism and allows an alternative route after transplant surgery, particularly in those patients who should extend the period of fasting (prolonged intubation, ileus, etc). Interestingly, in some studies, the dose of tacrolimus SL required to maintain similar plasma concentrations compared with oral administration, is significantly lower, even up to 50%, which can result in considerable savings in short and long term. Among these studies, only one was conducted in liver recipients. This study suggest that SL administration of tacrolimus could allow to obtain similar concentrations compared with oral administration. The design of this study did not assess the existence of differences in the dose required and only included six patients.

Detailed description

The patient will be scheduled fasting to liver transplant unit where the pharmacokinetic study was performed. After installation of the venous needle, blood samples will be collected on 4 ml tubes with EDTA as an anticoagulant at the following intervals of time in hours: 0 (immediately before the oral administration of tacrolimus); 0.5; 1.0; 1.5; 2; 4; 6; 9 and 12 h. post-dose. Once the blood samples taken, the tubes will be plugged, invest gently to mix with anticoagulant and stored at -20 ° C until analysis. Subsequently, tacrolimus administration was change to sublingual route and dose was adjusted to obtain similar trough levels to those determined on per oral administration. The capsule be opened and its contents shall be deposited in the sublingual mucosa. To be ensure that drug will be absorted the patient will be instructed to insistently that after sublingual placement of the drug, should not swallow the capsule content for at least 15 minutes. The same pharmacokinetic study described for the oral route will be performed. Breakfast will be administered 2 hours after ingesting the drug and lunch and dinner 6 and 10 hours after respectively. Fluid intake is discretionary.

Interventions

DRUGTacrolimus

compared oral administration versus sublingual administration of tacrolimus.

Sponsors

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outline of immunosuppression that includes tacrolimus dosing every 12 hours. * Stable plasma levels of tacrolimus in 3 consecutive measurements. * Stable blood tests: biochemical profile, creatinine and liver profile. * Absence of treatment with drugs that have interaction with tacrolimus (antifungal and diltiazem) and use of grapefruit juice. * Absence of active bacterial or viral infection and rejection episodes within 8 weeks prior.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare tacrolimus exposure using per oral and sublingual administration employing AUC (Area Under the Curve).30 dayscompared oral administration versus sublingual administration of tacrolimus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare tacrolimus dose necessary to obtain similar trough levels employing per oral and sublingual administration30 dayscompared oral administration versus sublingual administration of tacrolimus

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026