Skip to content

Efficiency of Early Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Impact of Early Intervention on the Global Development of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in a European French-speaking Population Dr Marie-Maude GEOFFRAY Le Vinatier Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02608333
Acronym
IDEA
Enrollment
180
Registered
2015-11-18
Start date
2015-09-09
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Early intervention, ESDM, behavioral and developmental intervention

Brief summary

Intervention for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in European French-speaking countries is often heterogeneous and poorly evaluated. Six French-speaking early intervention units for children with ASD following the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) have been created since 2011 with the common aim to evaluate effectiveness and cost-efficiency of the ESDM applied to the European French-speaking public health system. In those units, Children receive ESDM at minimum 12H per week by trained therapist. Therapist work in collaboration with parents (at home) and preschool or nursery. The first aim of the investigators study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ESDM intervention 12 hours per week during 2 years on the global development of children with ASD compared to the interventions commonly available in the community.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter (4 centers in France, 1 center in Switzerland and 1 center in Belgium), randomized, controlled, single blind trial using a modified Zelen design .It concerns children with ASD aged 18 to 36 months without severe neurological or physical disorder and living in the proximity of one the early intervention units. After diagnostic, Children will be included in a longitudinal cohort with the consent of the parents. Sixty children will be drawn lots among 180 children of the cohort and will be included in a ESDM intervention with the consent of the parents. Two groups will be compared: an experimental group of 60 children receiving 12 hours a week of ESDM intervention delivered by trained therapists during 2 years and a control group of 120 children receiving typical heterogeneous 'as-usual' intervention proposed by professionals and public services over the same period. Global developmental profiles of all the children will be measured at different time points over the two years through standardized tests such as the Mullen Scale of Early Learning (MSEL), the ADOS-2 and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale. Cost of each intervention will be calculated. The primary outcome is global development of the child, measured by the developmental quotient with the Mullen after 24 months of intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALESDM-12

ESDM is a comprehensive relational, developmental and behavioral intervention. It's described in a manual for professional (Rogers et al, 2010). Children receive ESDM 12H per week by trained therapist. Therapist work in collaboration with parents (at home) and preschool or nursery.

BEHAVIORALcontrol group

heteregenous as usual community intervention

Sponsors

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
CollaboratorOTHER
Versailles Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre hospitalier Saint Jean de Dieu - ARHM
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospices Civils de Lyon
CollaboratorOTHER
Hôpital le Vinatier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children 15 months to 36 months * Children with autism spectrum disorder (according to international criteria and standardized tests) * Children at a DQ of 30 at least at the MSEL * Family domiciled within 40 minutes of a early intervention unit (investigator center for the study)

Exclusion criteria

* Severe neurological or physical disorder identified not allowing intensive care * Unavailability of the family for regular monitoring of the child by the investigator center * Rett Syndrom

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Developmental quotient at the Mullen Scale of Early LearningChange from baseline in developmental quotient at 24 months follow-upThis criterion will be assessed with the Mullen scale of Early Learning (Mullen, 1995) by a psychologist blind of intervention group of the child:

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adaptive behavior score is measured by the composite score of Vineland adaptative behavior scale 2Change from baseline in adaptative behavior at 24 months follow-upAdaptative behavior score is measured by the composite score of Vineland adaptative behavior scale 2
Productive language level assessed with a standardized French productive language developmental scalechange from baseline in number of words at 24 months follow-up (T2)This criterion will be assessed with a standardized French productive language developmental scale (DLPF Development du language de production in French language) filled by parents
Costs associated with interventionsat 24 months follow-up (T2)Healthcare, social and personal resources devoted to child care throughout the study will be measured to evaluate the direct and indirect costs associated with intervention. Assessment will take place
Severity of autism symptoms is measured with ADOS 2Change from baseline in severity score of autism symptoms at 24 months follow-upseverity of autism symptoms is measured with ADOS 2 ( Autism Diagnostic observation Schedule 2)
Parent child naturalistic interaction during playAt baseline (inclusion ° T0), at 12 months follow-up (T1), and at 24 months follow-up (T2)Dyadic Communication Measure for Autism (DCMA)(Green et al, 2010; Pickles, 2015) will be used and score of parent's communication synchrony, child initiation, and shared attention will be assessed
Sensorial profilAt baseline (inclusion ° T0), at 12 months follow-up (T1), and at 24 months follow-up (T2)Sensorial profil of Dunn
Change at the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC)At baseline (inclusion ° T0), at 12 months follow-up (T1), and at 24 months follow-upThe total score of Brief Observation of Social Communication Change
Developement of communication and symbolic behaviorAt baseline (inclusion ° T0), at 12 months follow-up (T1), and at 24 months follow-upTotal score of Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scale Developmental Profil CSBS-DP questionnaire for caregivers (Wetherby et al, 2002)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026