Skip to content

Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography Imaging in Comparison to CE-MRI

Clinical Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Accuracy of Low Dose Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography Imaging in Comparison to CE-MRI

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02608281
Acronym
CEDEM
Enrollment
110
Registered
2015-11-18
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2017-08-01
Last updated
2017-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Keywords

Spectral Mammography, Dual energy, Contrast enhanced

Brief summary

Clinical study to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of low dose contrast enhanced dual energy mammography imaging (CEDEM+PRIME) in comparison with CE-MRI The primary objective of this clinical study is to assess diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer detection in Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography compared to CEMRI. Sensitivity and specificity will be compared for both modalities.

Detailed description

STUDY OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this clinical study is to assess the value of low-dose CEDEM in comparison with CE-MRI. The diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer detection of low dose CEDEM will be evaluated. Investigator plans to explore the diagnostic quality of 4 standard view bilateral dual energy subtracted images compared to CE-MRI in a blinded reader study. A goal is to evaluate, whether sensitivity and specificity of low-dose CEDEM are comparable with breast MRI. Subjects will be asked before diagnostic workup to participate in this clinical study. Approximately 80 subjects scheduled for a diagnostic CE-MRI (i.e., based on screening mammography classified as BI-RADS® 0, 4 or 5), will be eligible to participate in this study and will undergo a follow up 4 view bilateral low dose contrast enhanced mammography procedure. Radiologically, subjects included in the study population will have even distribution of masses, clusters of microcalcifications, and architectural distortions as given by the nature of breast cancer development. The study population will include all breast compositions. Diagnostic CE-MRI Examination If eligible, subjects with a positive or incomplete screening mammogram (BI-RADS 0, 4 or 5) will undergo a CE-MRI of the breast. MRI examinations will be performed on a 3 Tesla scanner (Tim trio, Siemens) with a dedicated 16 channel breast coil. A combination of high temporal and high spatial resolution imaging protocol will be used. All patients will be examined in the prone position and contrast agent (0.2mmol / body weight, GD-DOTA) will be administered i.v. as a bolus followed by a 20 ml saline flush. Both exams (CEDEM and CE-MRI) will be scheduled in the second week of the menstrual cycle in premenopausal women. Each suspicious lesion will undergo needle or surgical biopsy (after completion of the CEDEM+PRIME procedure). Imaging findings will be compared with findings of histology. Diagnostic CEDEM+PRIME If eligible, subjects with a completed MRI procedure will undergo a 4 standard view (CC, MLO) bilateral CEDEM examination. Due to use of the grid-less PRIME acquisition technology the AGD is limited and lies in the range of a standard mammogram. The high energy images will be acquired with the titanium filter. All acquired images - including the unprocessed images - will be collected. Recombined CEDEM images will be created offline. Contrast agent is injected as a bolus of 2 ml/kg body weight of non-ionic iodine contrast media with a power injector at a rate of 3.5ml/s followed by a 25ml saline flush. The CEDEM diagnostic procedure will be performed not later than 7 days and at least 24 hours after the CE-MRI procedure.

Interventions

DEVICECONTRAST ENHANCED DUAL ENERGY (CEDEM)

The CEDEM application requires the intravenous injection of iodide contrast agents. For each projection view (CC, MLO) a low and a high energy x-ray image will be acquired after Iodine based contrast medium administration. Patient will undergo CE MRI procedure.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
CollaboratorOTHER
Siemens Healthcare QT
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Females at least 21 years of age or older * A screening mammogram classified as BI-RADS® 0, 4 or 5 followed by a diagnostic CE-MRI and a histological verification of a given lesions either by needle biopsy or open surgery * Signed informed consent after receiving a verbal and written explanation of the purpose and nature of this clinical study

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or possible pregnant as well as lactating women * Have mammographic evidence of previous breast surgery, prior radiation to the breast, needle projection or pre-biopsy markings are evident on the mammogram * Breast implants * Patients who will undergo neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (BI-RADS 6) * Inmates or mentally disabled patient. * Renal insufficiency or contrast agent allergy * Patients who participated in other clinical studies within the last 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced dual energy mammography for breast cancer diagnosis24 monthsDifference in accuracy of 11% comparing a 4-view contrast-enhanced dual energy imaging to CE-MRI assuming 11% discordant rate in the diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sensitivity, specificity and the lesion-level ROC area.24 monthsThe ROC area will be estimated from the BI-RADSS scores assigned by the readers to each suspicious lesion. The BI-RADS scores assigned by the readers in the interpretation of a CEDEM lesion will be used for the CEDEM+PRIME ROC area; the BI-RADS scores assigned by the readers in the interpretation of a CE-MRI case per lesion will be used for the CE-MRI ROC area. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC), or ROC curve, is a graphical plot that illustrates the performance of a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied. The curve is created by plotting the true positive rate (TPR) against the false positive rate (FPR) at various threshold settings

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026