Skip to content

Anticoagulation Preference by AF Patients Study

AF Patient Preferences Towards NOAC Versus VKA Treatment: a Patient Preference Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02607371
Acronym
PRiSMA-AF
Enrollment
198
Registered
2015-11-18
Start date
2015-08-27
Completion date
2016-10-15
Last updated
2017-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Patient treatment preference, Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation, NOAC, VKA

Brief summary

The main research question of this patient survey is to assess AF (Atrial Fibrillation) patients' preferences associated with different attributes which describe the different available anticoagulation treatment options (Vitamin K Antagonists \[VKA\] or New Oral Anticoagulants \[NOACs\] and, in case of NOACs, Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban or Rivaroxaban). VKAs (Marcoumar®, Sintrom ®) will be grouped together and compared to Rivaroxaban.

Detailed description

The objective of this study is to investigate the following research questions in a cross-sectional survey of German-speaking Swiss AF patients being treated either with a VKA or with a NOAC: * Which attributes of a medication to prevent stroke do AF patients view as important? * Do AF patients have a preference regarding the attributes of the medication options VKA or NOAC and, in case of NOACs, with regards to rivaroxaban attributes? * Are there subgroups of AF patients whose preference for one of the medication options appears above or below average? * What is the quality of life of Swiss German-speaking AF patients? Are there subgroups with differences in their quality of life (for example: subgroups of patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores)? * Which burden do German-speaking Swiss AF patients experience in association with their anticoagulation therapy? Are there differences in the burden of treatment (ACTS) between patients treated with VKA or with NOACs?

Interventions

OTHERVKAs

VKA have been prescribed in the customary manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization; decision to prescribe these agents has been made at least 3 months prior to study inclusion; assignment of a patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is only made retrospectively (treatment decision falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicines is separated from the decision to include the patient in the study)

OTHERNOACs including Rivaroxaban (Xarelto, BAY59-7939)

NOAC have been prescribed in the customary manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization; decision to prescribe these agents has been made at least 3 months prior to study inclusion; assignment of a patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is only made retrospectively (treatment decision falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicines is separated from the decision to include the patient in the study)

OTHEREdoxaban

NOAC have been prescribed in the customary manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization; decision to prescribe these agents has been made at least 3 months prior to study inclusion; assignment of a patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is only made retrospectively (treatment decision falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicines is separated from the decision to include the patient in the study)

OTHERApixaban

NOAC have been prescribed in the customary manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization; decision to prescribe these agents has been made at least 3 months prior to study inclusion; assignment of a patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is only made retrospectively (treatment decision falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicines is separated from the decision to include the patient in the study)

NOAC have been prescribed in the customary manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization; decision to prescribe these agents has been made at least 3 months prior to study inclusion; assignment of a patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is only made retrospectively (treatment decision falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicines is separated from the decision to include the patient in the study)

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for AF patients in both the NOAC and the VKA groups: * Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (persistent, paroxysmal, permanent), * Age of at least 18 years at time of study inclusion, * Generally willingness (informed consent) and ability to fill out a survey on satisfaction with treatment and quality of life, and to conduct a structured phone interview (approx. 20 - 30 min) in German language. Additional inclusion criterion for Group 1 (NOAC): * Continuous anticoagulation with either Apixaban, or Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for prevention of Stroke & systemic embolism for at least the previous 3 months. Additional inclusion criterion for Group 2 (VKA): * Continuous anticoagulation with a VKA for prevention of Stroke & systemic embolism for at least the previous 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AF patients'preferences towards anticoagulation treatment with either VKAs or NOACs measured with a DCE (discrete choice experiment) design in a phone interviewup to 4 weeks* DCE is based on the following attributes /attribute levels: * Frequency of intake (once/twice daily), * Need of INR monitoring/dose adjustment (yes/no), * Need of bridging (yes/no), * Interactions with food/drugs (yes/no), * Distance to treating physician (1km or 15km).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related quality of life measured by the SF-12 questionnaireup to 4 weeksVariables: Physical/psychological domain according to SF-12 questionnaire
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: preferred anticoagulation treatment (agent)up to 4 weeks
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: HrQoL as defined by the SF-12 scoreup to 4 weeks
Burden associated with anticoagulation treatment measured by the questionnaire ACTSBaseline
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: TTR (for VKA patients only)up to 4 weeks
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: Ageup to 4 weeks
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: Genderup to 4 weeks
Assessment of factors that may be associated with AF patients preferences towards a specific anticoagulation treatment: AF symptoms as measured by the EHRAup to 4 weeks

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026