Skip to content

Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT

Comparison of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Without Stent Implantation Against a Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Randomized Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02607241
Acronym
OCTOPUS-3
Enrollment
59
Registered
2015-11-18
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2018-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

drug-coated balloon, bioresorbable scaffold, fractional flow reserve, optical coherence tomography

Brief summary

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different metal-free strategies for elective percutaneous coronary revascularization: the FFR-guided DCB-only PCI (drug-coated balloon: SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) vs. OCT-guided BRS implantation (bioresorbable scaffold: Absorb™, Abbott Vascular).

Detailed description

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for most deaths in the industrialized countries due to its high prevalence of 6-8%. CAD is mainly treated by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), which currently involve in over 90% of cases the implantation of metallic stents, mostly as drug-eluting devices(DES). Despite continuous technological advancement over the last decade, DES are still limited at long-term follow-up by restenosis and also by the risk of thrombosis, occurring in 5-20% and respectively 0.5-1.7% of cases. Therefore, two metal-free strategies are evaluated in order to overcome these intrinsic limitations of DES: 1. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) proved comparable safety and efficacy at 1 year compared to best-in-class DES comparators and also showed in small substudies very promising 5-year results with restoration of vasomotricity and positive vessel remodeling. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the new gold standard for endovascular imaging of stents, atherosclerosis progression, vulnerable plaque and neointimal proliferation. OCT is currently recommended for both guidance of implantation and for assessment of long-term results of BRS. 2. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) were mainly employed to treat restenosis in metallic stents, but newer reports advocate their potential to be used as stand-alone treatment of de-novo stenoses without stenting, especially when fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements are additionally used to assess PCI results. This clinical trial evaluates the FFR-guided DCB-only (experimental arm: SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) PCI against the OCT-guided BRS implantation (comparator arm: Absorb™, Abbott Vascular) for treatment of stable CAD. The trial is designed as a non-inferiority, nationally conducted, multicenter, open-labeled, controlled study using a 1:1 block randomization and am invasive 6-9 month follow-up (f/u) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT. Beyond the pre-specified endpoints the study mainly looking at suppression of neointimal proliferation, we will also investigate the patterns of healing and neointimal proliferation, the plaque morphology and neoatherosclerosis f/u using OCT at 6-9 months. Clinically, we attempt to record the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: acute myocardial infarction, cardiac death, TLR) up to 5 years after the index procedure. A number of 196 patients scheduled for PCI with a native coronary stenosis suitable for BRS implantation and OCT imaging will be openly 1:1 randomized. This number of patients is considered to be sufficient to prove non-inferiority of DCB-only vs. BRS, using a margin of 0.2 mm with a confidence interval of 0.5 mm for the primary endpoint (diameter NLG).

Interventions

DEVICEOCT-guided BRS implantation

Implantation of a BRS using OCT to measure vessel size, choose BRS size and length and assess implantation results and the need of further postdilations

DEVICEFFR-guided DCB-only PCI

PCI performed under FFR guidance using following algorithm: (1) predilation followed by angiographic assessment of residual stenosis and dissections; (2) evaluate suitability for DCB-only, which is deemed feasible if the FFR \> 0.8, residual diameter stenosis \< 40% and no flow-limiting dissections are observed; (3) DCB dilation and (4) assessment of final results using FFR and QCA measurements. Provisional stenting is allowed only if the final PCI results are not acceptable (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 40% or FFR \< 0.8).

Sponsors

KKS Netzwerk
CollaboratorNETWORK
University of Jena
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written consent * indication for elective PCI of a de novo coronary stenosis in a native vessel * coronary multivessel disease with clinically proven indication for repeating coronary angiography at 6-9 months (staged PCI strategy)

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy, lactation, women of childbearing age w/o reliable contraception * life expectance \< 50 % at 1 year * major surgery planned within 6 months * participation in other clinical trials or impossibility to give written consent * acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock within the last 4 weeks * stent thrombosis, defined as probable or definite by ARC * contraindication against dual antiplatelet therapy * allergy against mTOR-inhibitors or taxol derivates * target lesion situated in the left main coronary artery, in a bypass graft or a grafted vessel * reference luminal diameter of the target lesion \> 3.75 mm or \< 2.0 mm * lesion length \> 30 mm, bifurcation lesion requiring intervention on a major side branch

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic NLG6-9 monthsAbsolute net luminal diameter gain measured by QCA as minimal luminal diameter at f/u - minimal luminal diameter at baseline within the region of interest

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volumetric NLG6-9 monthsAbsolute net luminal volumetric gain using three-dimensional OCT-based vessel segment reconstruction at f/u
Angiographic and volumetric LLL6-9 monthsAbsolute late luminal diameter loss (LLL) using QCA and late luminal volumetric loss by OCT at f/u
TLR0-9 months% clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) during f/u

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute TVF0-9 monthsTarget vessel failure requiring emergent revascularization

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026