Skip to content

Automatic Chlorination and Child Health in Urban Bangladesh

Evaluating Low-cost Automatic Water Disinfection Systems to Improve Water Quality and Child Health in Urban Bangladesh

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02606981
Enrollment
1549
Registered
2015-11-17
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-12-20
Last updated
2017-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Communicable Diseases, Diarrhea

Keywords

Water treatment, Child growth, Enteric infection

Brief summary

Municipal water networks within industrialized countries typically rely on centralized treatment to manage piped water quality. Optimal water quality at the tap, however, requires well-maintained piped distribution networks, and performs best when piped systems are fully pressurized. In low-income cities such as Dhaka, water distribution networks are inadequately maintained and typically supply intermittent service; as such, they are vulnerable to recontamination during negative pressure events. Among populations accessing these types of improved water sources in urban settings (e.g. shared taps), it is unknown if consistent treatment to provide chlorinated water at the point of collection would have a significant health benefit. Furthermore, almost all previous studies of water treatment interventions in low-income countries have been unblinded with self-reported diarrhea as the main outcome, casting doubt that reported impacts of water disinfection on diarrhea are not due entirely to social desirability bias. Stanford University in collaboration with icddr,b will conduct a randomized evaluation to assess the impact on access to automatically chlorinated water on water quality and child health.

Detailed description

Investigators will conduct a blinded cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the health and economic impacts of having access to automatically chlorinated water. The unit of randomization will be shared water points that typically serve 20-200 households. Shared water points connected to holding tanks compatible with the water treatment technology, and serving more than 4 households with at least one child under five, will be identified. Households accessing eligible water points as their primary drinking water source will be enrolled before installation of chlorine devices, and a baseline survey will be conducted of water quality, diarrhea prevalence, and health care expenditures. Following this baseline, households will be randomly assigned to control or treatment groups. The chlorination devices will be installed at the treatment group water points, while a doser containing vitamin C (and no chlorine), will be installed in the control group. The free chlorine dosing target will be below \<1ppm to preserve blinding. All households will be surveyed every 2-3 months for a total follow up period of 14-16 months (5-7 survey rounds, budget permitting). Objectives: 1. To evaluate the impact of an automated chlorination system on microbial stored drinking water quality, residual chlorine, user satisfaction, user perceptions of water taste and smell, under-five child diarrhea (longitudinal prevalence) compared to a control group. 2. Compare the marginal additional cost (per person served) of installing and maintaining an automated chlorination system integrated with the current water supply infrastructure in low-income areas of Dhaka. 3. Assess the impact of an automated chlorination system on hospital visits and health care expenditures. 4. To measure secondary outcomes of the impact of an automated chlorination system including under-five child weight-for-age (WAZ), under-five height-for-age (HAZ), as well as levels of C-reactive protein and immunoglobin G in serum samples collected from children under five (these are objective indicators of infection, such as repeat diarrheal episodes). Analysis: The primary analyses will be intent-to-treat (investigators will analyze differences in outcomes between the treatment and control groups, with groups defined by their random allocation). Investigators will also conduct a secondary analysis comparing outcomes between intervention and control, where the intervention group is defined as those households that had free chlorine residual detected in their stored drinking water (treated on the treated analysis).

Interventions

DEVICEWater chlorination by the Flogenic

The chlorine doser delivers a constant amount of chlorine into water as it flows into a holding tank. The water is then piped to public and private taps.

DEVICEActive control, vitamin C dosing into water

The control group will receive a vitamin C dosing device that looks identical to the intervention chlorine doser installed in the holding tank that feeds their shared water access point.

Sponsors

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 60 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Households with at least one child under 60 months old * Households using enrolled shared water point as primary drinking water source

Exclusion criteria

* Households with a private drinking water source Note: New births and children under 60 months that migrate into compounds accessing the enrolled water points for drinking water will be enrolled into the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diarrhea longitudinal prevalenceMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baseline1-week recall period, case definition is 3 or more loose/watery bowel movements in 24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory illness longitudinal prevalenceMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baselineone week recall period, symptoms include congestion, cough, difficulty breathing
total immunoglobin G (IgG)Measured at baseline and conclusion of study (16 months post baseline) among children under five
Prevalence and number of enteric pathogensMeasured 6-12 months after intervention delivery among children under five
Caregiver defined diarrheaMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baseline1-week recall period, defined with local Bengali word for diarrhea
Weight-for-age-z-scoreMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baselineWeight-for-age z-score among children under five years
Height-for-age-z-scoreMeasured at baseline and 16 months after baselineHeight-for-age z-score among children under five
C-reactive proteinMeasured at baseline and conclusion of study (16 months post baseline) among children under five

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
health related treatment and associated costMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baseline
Microbial water qualityMeasured monthly among a subset of households, for 16 months post baselineColony forming units of the fecal indicator bacteria, E. coli
Chlorine residual in household stored drinking waterMeasured every 2-3 months for 16 months post baselineFree chlorine residual in ppm

Countries

Bangladesh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026