Skip to content

Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa in Obese Women in Terms of Clinical and Molecular Parameters of IVF Success

Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa in Obese Women in Terms of Clinical and Molecular Parameters of IVF Success

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02606500
Enrollment
70
Registered
2015-11-17
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2018-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to determine, whether clinical efficacy of 150 mcg of Corifollitropin alfa is the same in normal weighing and obese women. Furthermore, investigators want to determine whether oocytes retrieved from normal weighing and obese women, after COH using 150 mcg of Corifollitropin alfa, are of same quality on the molecular level.

Detailed description

The dosage of Corifollitropin alfa used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is adjusted according to the patient's body weight. Meaning, in women with a body weight ≤ 60 kg, a single dose of 100 mcg of Corifollitropin alfa is administered for COH and in women with a body weight \> 60 kg, a single dose of 150 micrograms of Corifollitropin alfa is administered for COH. These two protocols are comparable in safety and efficacy of follicular stimulation. On the other hand, knowledge about the clinical efficacy of 150 mcg of Corifollitropin alfa in obese women (BMI\>30 kg/m2) is lacking. Cumulus cells (CC) surround the oocyte and bi-directional communication between oocyte and CC is necessary for the development of mature and quality oocytes. It has been proposed, that analysis of genes, expressed in CC, can serve as an objective indicator of the oocyte's maturity and developmental potential. Expression of genes in CC as hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), versican (VCAN), progesterone receptor (PR), vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC), serine protease inhibitor E2 (SERPINE2), glutathione peroxidase (GPX3), pentraxin 3(PTX3) was reported to correlate with oocyte maturity and developmental potential. The effect of Corifollitropin alfa on expression of these genes however, is unknown.

Interventions

DRUGElonva

20 obese women will be the study group and 20 normal weighing women will be the control group. Both groups will receive 150 mcg of Elonva for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist will be used to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. Additional daily doses of 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) will be used if necessary. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) will be used for oocyte maturation. 2 mature follicles will be aspirated separately in each patient. Cumulus cell (CC) samples will be collected and stored on -80 oC for subsequent analysis. Clinical and molecular parameters of IVF success will be assessed and compared between the groups. The exclusion criteria will be: polycystic ovary syndrome, severely abnormal sperm parameters, and age \> 38 years.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BMI \> 30 kg/m2 * BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* polycystic ovary syndrome, severely abnormal sperm parameters, and age \> 38 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Mature Oocytes1 monthNumber of mature oocytes obtained was compared between groups
Number of Fertilized Oocytes1 month
Number of Frozen Embryos1 month
Biochemical Pregnancy Rate1 year
Number of Oocytes Retrieved Per Patient1 monthNumber of oocytes obtained in the study group was compared to the number of oocytes obtained in the control group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Real-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular Level12 monthsExpression of some genes that were proposed as biomarkers of oocyte quality was analysed in CC using real-time PCR. Relative expression values of genes were compared between mature oocytes derived from obese women and mature oocytes derived from normal weighing women.

Countries

Slovenia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Group
35 obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) were included to the study group. 150 mcg of Elonva for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on day 2 or 3 of menstrual cycle. GnRH antagonist was used to prevent premature LH surge. Additional daily doses of 200 IU of rFSH were used if necessary to achieve optimal ovarian stimulation. hCG was used to induce final oocyte maturation. Follicles were aspirated separately in each patient. Cumulus cells (CC) samples of the first 2 aspirated follicles were collected and stored on -80 oC for subsequent analyses. Clinical IVF parameters were assessed and compared between the groups. Also, gene expression analyses of CC were performed using quantitative real-time PCR. Inclusion criteria for the study group were: first or second IVF cycle, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, tubal factor of infertility, normal partner's spermiogram.
35
Control Group
35 normal weighing women (BMI 19 - 24.9 kg/m2) were included to the study group. 150 mcg of Elonva for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on day 2 or 3 of menstrual cycle. GnRH antagonist was used to prevent premature LH surge. Additional daily doses of 200 IU of rFSH were used if necessary to achieve optimal ovarian stimulation. hCG was used to induce final oocyte maturation. Follicles were aspirated separately in each patient. Cumulus cells (CC) samples of the first 2 aspirated follicles were collected and stored on -80 oC for subsequent analyses. Clinical IVF parameters were assessed and compared between the groups. Also, gene expression analyses of CC were performed using quantitative real-time PCR. Inclusion criteria for the control group were: first or second IVF cycle, normal BMI (19 - 24.9 kg/m2), tubal factor of infertility and normal partner's spermiogram. s.
35
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Customized
Age
30.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
31.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
30.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants35 Participants70 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovenia
35 Participants35 Participants70 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Women
35 Participants35 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Biochemical Pregnancy Rate

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Study GroupBiochemical Pregnancy Rate18 Biochemical pregnancies
Control GroupBiochemical Pregnancy Rate18 Biochemical pregnancies
p-value: 0.4Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Fertilized Oocytes

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Study GroupNumber of Fertilized Oocytes206 Fertilized oocytes
Control GroupNumber of Fertilized Oocytes207 Fertilized oocytes
p-value: 0.3Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Frozen Embryos

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Study GroupNumber of Frozen Embryos45 Frozen embryos
Control GroupNumber of Frozen Embryos49 Frozen embryos
p-value: 0.9Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Mature Oocytes

Number of mature oocytes obtained was compared between groups

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Study GroupNumber of Mature Oocytes269 Mature oocytes
Control GroupNumber of Mature Oocytes319 Mature oocytes
p-value: 0.5Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Oocytes Retrieved Per Patient

Number of oocytes obtained in the study group was compared to the number of oocytes obtained in the control group

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupNumber of Oocytes Retrieved Per Patient11.3 OocytesStandard Deviation 7.5
Control GroupNumber of Oocytes Retrieved Per Patient12.4 OocytesStandard Deviation 7.4
p-value: 0.9Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Real-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular Level

Expression of some genes that were proposed as biomarkers of oocyte quality was analysed in CC using real-time PCR. Relative expression values of genes were compared between mature oocytes derived from obese women and mature oocytes derived from normal weighing women.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Gene expression in cumulus cells surrounding mature oocytes was analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). We analyzed 53 CC samples in the Study group and 56 CC samples in Control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelProgesterone receptor (PGR)2.52 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 1.73
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelPentraxin 3 (PTX3)1.49 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 1.37
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelSerpin Family E Member 2 (SERPINE2)0.83 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.75
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelFollicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR)1.29 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 1.58
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelGlutathione peroxidase (GPX3)0.66 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 1.31
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelHyaluronan Synthase 2 (HAS2)1.02 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.78
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelVersican (VCAN)5.40 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 4.66
Study GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelVascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC)0.79 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.46
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelVascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC)0.84 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.42
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelProgesterone receptor (PGR)1.31 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.9
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelGlutathione peroxidase (GPX3)0.33 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.25
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelPentraxin 3 (PTX3)0.63 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.58
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelVersican (VCAN)5.09 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 5.6
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelSerpin Family E Member 2 (SERPINE2)0.61 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.43
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelHyaluronan Synthase 2 (HAS2)0.96 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 0.71
Control GroupReal-time PCR Analysis of Genes That Were Proposed as Biomarkers of Oocyte Quality to Determine Effect of Corifollitropin Alpha on Oocyte Quality on Molecular LevelFollicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR)1.2 Arbitrary units (Relative expression)Standard Deviation 1.15

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026