Skip to content

Adductor Canal Catheter vs Local Infiltration of Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) and Local Infiltration of Analgesia (LIA) Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02603900
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-11-13
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2021-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Keywords

Adductor Canal Catheter, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Local infiltration of analgesia

Brief summary

The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing local infiltration of analgesia in the knee joint and adductor canal catheters for postoperative analgesia following a primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

Detailed description

The study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two methods of postoperative analgesia following primary TKA. Eligible primary TKA patients must be ASA I - III and require less than 20 mg oxycodone daily (or its equivalent). Exclusion criteria are: allergy to anesthetics, contraindication to regional anesthesia, sensory/ motor disorder involving operative limb, non-english speaking, ASA IV or greater, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, incarceration, renal insufficiency with Cr \> 2.0 and hepatic failure. When patients agree to participate in the study the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, quantitative opiate use, numeric pain score with visual descriptors, painDETECT score, WOMAC score and baseline Pain Management Questionnaire. When designated through randomization, local infiltration of analgesia will be placed intraoperatively by the surgeons, per usual protocol and patients in the LIA group will receive sham adductor canal catheter. All ACC's for both study groups will be placed postoperatively in the PACU. Those collecting data will be blinded from identifying patients in the control group, as both groups will have ACC placed with same technique. Potential risks for each procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity in the form of seizure and cardiac arrest and neuropathy. The preceding are commonly listed though infrequent complications of both procedures. Continuous ultrasound will guide the placement of the ACC. All adductor canal catheters will remain in for 72 hours. Pt from LIA group will be discharged home with sham catheter with a saline infusion at 10 ml/hr via an ambulatory pump. Patients in ACC group will be discharged with continuous adductor canal catheter delivering ropivacaine 0.2% at 10 ml/hr via an ambulatory pump. Patients will be called daily for pain diary results. As well as at 6-8 weeks postoperatively to collect painDetect and WOMAC survey.

Interventions

DRUGropivacaine

15 ml 0.5% Ropivicaine for primary adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance and 0.2% Ropivicaine infusion 10 ml/hr.

DRUGbupivacaine

20 ml bupivacaine ( Marcaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:200000, Hospira Inc. Lake Forest, IL) diluted with 40 ml of normal saline injected intraoperatively into the knee joint before closure.

DEVICESham Adductor Canal Catheter

Sham catheter placement via ultrasound-guided adductor canal block and 10ml/hr saline via OnQ Pump via continuous catheter in adductor canal.

Catheter placed in adductor canal via ultrasound guidance and continuous infusion via OnQ pump.

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 40-85 * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) 1-3. • Undergoing Unilateral, Primary, Total Knee Arthroplasty * English as native language

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal * History of opioid dependence * Contraindication to peripheral nerve block • Pre-existing significant neuropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative pain via numeric rating scale at rest and with activity during each physical therapy sessionpost-operative day #0 to post-operative day #3postoperative pain as measured by numeric rating scale at rest and with movement during each physical therapy session.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative opioid consumptionpost-operative day #0 to postoperative day # 3Opioid consumption during hospitalization in oxycodone equivalents at 24, 48 and 72 hours
Chronic post-surgical pain measured via validated painDetect and WOMAC questionnaires6-8 weeks after surgical dateAssess post-surgical pain and function as measured by PainDetect and WOMAC questionnaires at 6-8 weeks post-operative compared to preoperative pain and function
Passive and Active Range of Motion during Physical TherapyPOD #0 to postoperative day #2Assess quantitative passive and active range of motion during physical therapy as well as Timed up to Go (TUG) which is routine assessment during physical therapy.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026