Skip to content

A Study of Tazemetostat in Adult Participants With Soft Tissue Sarcoma

A Phase II, Multicenter Study of the EZH2 Inhibitor Tazemetostat in Adult Subjects With INI1-Negative Tumors or Relapsed/Refractory Synovial Sarcoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02601950
Enrollment
267
Registered
2015-11-11
Start date
2015-12-22
Completion date
2024-02-26
Last updated
2025-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Any Solid Tumor With an EZH2 GOF Mutation, Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors (ATRT), Epithelioid Sarcoma, INI1-negative Tumors, Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor of Ovary, Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors (MRT), Poorly Differentiated Chordoma (or Other Chordoma With Sponsor Approval), Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Rhabdoid Tumors of the Kidney (RTK), Selected Tumors With Rhabdoid Features, Synovial Sarcoma

Brief summary

This study will include participants with various types of cancer known as soft-tissue sarcomas. Tissues that can be affected by soft tissue sarcomas include fat, muscle, blood vessels, deep skin tissues, tendons and ligaments. Soft tissue cancers are rare and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Part 1 of this trial will study the safety and the level that adverse effects of the study drug tazemetostat in combination with doxorubicin (current front line treatment) can be tolerated (known as tolerability). It is also designed to establish a recommended study drug dosage for the next part of the study. Part 2 will evaluate and compare how long participants live without their disease getting worse when receiving the study drug plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus placebo (dummy treatment).

Detailed description

This is a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single arm, 2-stage study of tazemetostat 800 mg BID (twice daily) and 1600 mg QD (once daily). Subjects will be screened for eligibility within 21 days of the planned date of the first dose of tazemetostat and enrolled into one of 8 cohorts: Cohort using tazemetostat 800 mg BID * Cohort 1 (Closed for enrollment): malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT), rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and selected tumors with rhabdoid features, including small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), also known as malignant rhaboid tumor of the ovary (MRTO) * Cohort 2 (Closed for enrollment): Relapsed or refractory synovial sarcoma with SS18-SSX rearrangement * Cohort 3 (Closed for enrollment): Other integrase interactor 1 (INI1) negative tumors or any solid tumor with an enhancer of zeste homologue-2 (EZH2) gain of function (GOF) mutation, including: epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), myoepithelial carcinoma, other INI1-negative malignant tumors with Sponsor approval (e.g., dedifferentiated chordoma) any solid tumor with an EZH2 GOF mutation including but not limited to Ewing's sarcoma and melanoma * Cohort 4 (Closed for enrollment): Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) * Cohort 5 (Closed for enrollment): Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) * Cohort 6 (Closed for enrollment): Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) undergoing mandatory tumor biopsy * Cohort 7 (Closed for enrollment): Poorly differentiated chordoma (or other chordoma with Sponsor approval) Cohort using tazemetostat 1600 mg QD • Cohort 8 (Closed for enrollment): Epitheliod sarcoma Participants will be dosed in continuous 28-day cycles. (Note: if treatment with study drug is discontinued prior to completing 2 years, subjects will be followed for a maximum duration of 2 years from start of study drug dosing.) Response assessment will be performed every 8 weeks while on study. Treatment with tazemetostat will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.

Interventions

DRUGTazemetostat

Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) is a selective small molecule inhibitor of the histone-lysine methyltransferase EZH2 gene

Sponsors

Epizyme, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age (at the time of consent/assent): ≥18 years of age 2. Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 3. Has provided signed written informed consent 4. Has a life expectancy of \>3 months 5. Has a malignancy: * For which there are no standard therapies available (Cohorts 1, 3, 4 and 5) * That is relapsed or refractory after treatment with an approved therapy(ies), defined as metastatic or non-resectable, locally advanced disease that has previously been treated with and progressed following approved therapy(ies) (Cohort 2) * That has progressed within 6 months prior to study enrollment (Cohort 5 Expansion, Cohort 6 and Cohort 8 ONLY) 6. Has a documented local diagnostic pathology of original biopsy confirmed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA/College of American Pathologists (CAP) or equivalent laboratory certification 7. For Cohort 1 (rhabdoid tumors only), the following test results must be available by local laboratory: morphology and immunophenotypic panel consistent with rhabdoid tumors, and loss of INI1 or SMARCA4 confirmed by IHC, or molecular confirmation of tumor bi-allelic INI1 or SMARCA4 loss or mutation when INI1 or SMARCA4 IHC is equivocal or unavailable 8. For Cohort 2 (subjects with relapsed/refractory synovial sarcoma only), the following tests must be available by local laboratory: Morphology consistent with synovial sarcomas, and cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or molecular confirmation (e.g., DNA sequencing) of SS18 rearrangement t(X;18)(p11;q11) 9. For Cohort 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 (subjects with INI1-negative/aberrant tumors or any solid tumor with EZH2 GOF mutation only), the following test results must be available by local laboratory: Morphology and immunophenotypic panel consistent with INI1-negative tumors (not applicable for solid tumors with EZH2 GOF mutation), and loss of INI1 confirmed by IHC, or molecular confirmation of tumor bi-allelic INI1 loss or mutation when INI1 IHC is equivocal or unavailable, or molecular evidence of EZH2 GOF mutation 10. For Cohort 6 (subjects with ES undergoing optional tumor biopsy) only: * Morphology and immunophenotypic panel consistent with ES (e.g., CD34, EMA, Keratin, and INI1) 11. Has all prior treatment (i.e. chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy) related clinically significant toxicities resolve to ≤Grade 1 per CTCAE version 4.0.3 or are clinically stable and not clinically significant, at time of enrollment. 12. Prior anti-cancer therapy(ies), if applicable, must be completed according to the criteria below: * Chemotherapy: cytotoxic (At least 14 days since last dose of chemotherapy prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Chemotherapy: nitrosoureas (At least 6 weeks since last dose of nitrosoureas prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Chemotherapy: non-cytotoxic (e.g., small molecule inhibitor) (At least 14 days since last dose of non-cytotoxic chemotherapy prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Monoclonal antibody(ies) (At least 28 days since the last dose of any monoclonal antibody prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Immunotherapy (e.g. tumor vaccine) (At least 42 days since last dose of immunotherapy agent(s) prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Radiotherapy (RT) (At least 14 days from last local site RT prior to first dose of tazemetostat/At least 21 days from stereostatic radiosurgery prior to first dose of tazemetostat/At least 12 weeks from craniospinal, ≥50% radiation of pelvis, or total body irradiation prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * High dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell infusion (At least 60 days from last infusion prior to first dose of tazemetostat) * Hematopoietic growth factor (At least 14 days from last dose of hematopoietic growth factor prior to first dose of tazemetostat) 13. Has sufficient tumor tissue (slides or blocks) available for central confirmatory testing 14. Has measurable disease based on either RECIST 1.1 for solid tumors or RANO for CNS tumors 15. Has adequate hematologic (bone marrow \[BM\] and coagulation factors), renal and hepatic function. 16. For subjects with CNS Tumors only, subject must have seizures that are stable, not increasing in frequency or severity and controlled on current anti-seizure medication(s) for a minimum of 21 days prior to the planned first dose of tazemetostat 17. Has a shortening fraction of \>27% or an ejection fraction of ≥50% by echocardiogram (ECHO) or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class ≤2 18. Has a QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) ≤480 msec 19. Female subjects of childbearing potential must: * Have a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test at time of screening and within 14 days prior to planned first dose of tazemetostat and * Agree to use effective contraception from a minimum of 7 days prior to first dose until 6 months following the last dose of tazemetostat and have a male partner who uses a condom, or * Practice true abstinence or have a male partner who is vasectomized 20. Male subjects with a female partner of childbearing potential must: * Be vasectomized, or * Agree to use condoms as defined in Section 8.6.2, from first dose of tazemetostat until 3 months following the last dose of tazemetostat, or * Have a female partner who is NOT of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

1. Has had prior exposure to tazemetostat or other inhibitor(s) of enhancer of zeste homologue-2 (EZH2) 2. Has participated in another interventional clinical study and received investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to the planned first dose of tazemetostat 3. Has known active CNS or any leptomeningeal metastasis of primary extra-cranial tumor. 4. Has had a prior malignancy other than the malignancies under study - EXCEPTION: A subject who has been disease-free for 5 years, or a subject with a history of a completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma is eligible 5. Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to enrollment 6. Has Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or anemia of Grade ≥3 (per CTCAE 4.03 criteria) or any prior history of myeloid malignancies, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Has abnormalities known to be associated with MDS (e.g. del 5q, chr 7 abn) and MPN (e.g. JAK2 V617F) observed in cytogenetic testing and DNA sequencing. 7. Has a prior history of T-LBL /T-ALL 8. Is unwilling to exclude grapefruit juice, Seville oranges and grapefruit from the diet 9. Has cardiovascular impairment, history of congestive heart failure greater than NYHA Class II, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or stroke within 6 months prior to the planned first dose of tazemetostat; or ventricular cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment 10. Is currently taking any prohibited medication(s) 11. Has an active infection requiring systemic treatment 12. Is immunocompromised (i.e. has congenital immunodeficiency), including subjects known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 13. Has known active infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus 14. Has had a symptomatic venous thrombosis within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment - 15. For subjects with CNS involvement (primary tumor or metastatic disease), have any active bleeding or new intratumoral hemorrhage of more than punctuate size of screening MRI obtained within 14 days of starting study drug or known bleeding diathesis or treatment with anti-platelet or anti-thrombotic agents 16. Has known hypersensitivity to any of the component of tazemetostat or other inhibitor(s)of EZH2 17. Is unable to take oral medications, or has a malabsorption syndrome or any uncontrolled gastrointestinal condition (e.g., nausea, diarrhea or vomiting) that would limit compliance with study requirements. 18. Has an uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, uncontrolled infection, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. 19. For female subjects of childbearing potential: Is pregnant or nursing 20. For male subjects: Is unwilling to adhere to contraception criteria from time of enrollment in the study to at least 3 months after last dose of tazemetostat.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the investigator review from start of treatment until progressive disease (PD) or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy or cancer-related surgery, whichever was earlier, as per response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria for primary brain tumors or response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1 criteria for all other solid tumors. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment started. In addition, sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
Cohort 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 16 Weeks of Treatment With TazemetostatAt 16 WeeksPFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PFS rate at 16 week was estimated. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
Cohort 8: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 148 weeksAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant. TEAEs were defined as AEs if one of the following conditions met: emerged after the time of first dose administration, having been absent prior to the first dose; re-emerged, having been present but stopped prior to the time of first dose administration; worsened in severity after the time of first dose administration relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)OS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the date of death due to any cause.
All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56At Weeks 24, 32 and 56OS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the date of death due to any cause. OS rate at 24, 32 and 56 weeks were estimated. Estimates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and 95% CIs using the complementary log-log transformation.
All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration 28 days)DOR was defined as time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR based on investigator review to the time of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever came first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
Cohorts 2 and 8: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR based on investigator assessment from start of treatment until PD or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy or cancer-related surgery, whichever was earlier, as per RANO criteria for primary brain tumors or RECIST v 1.1 criteria for all other solid tumors. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48At Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed response (CR or PR, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria) or who have SD lasting at least 32 weeks from the start of treatment until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.
All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration 28 days)PFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.
All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56At Weeks 24, 32 and 56PFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PFS rate at 24, 32 and 56 weeks were estimated. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. Estimates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and 95% CIs using the complementary log-log transformation.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase II, open-label study was conducted at 28 sites in 9 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) from 22 December 2015 to 26 February 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were enrolled into 1 of the 8 cohorts based on tumor type. A total of 267 participants were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1
Participants with rhabdoid tumors (MRT, RTK, ATRT, and selected tumors with rhabdoid features, including SCCOHT, also known as MRTO) received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
32
Synovial Sarcoma: Cohort 2
Participants with relapsed or refractory synovial sarcoma with SS18-SSX rearrangement received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
33
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3
Participants with other INI-1-negative tumors or any solid tumor with EZH2 GOF mutation, including EMPNST, EMC, myoepithelial carcinoma, other INI-1-negative malignant tumors with sponsor approval, any solid tumor with EZH2 GOF mutation including but not limited to Ewing's sarcoma and melanoma received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
32
RMC: Cohort 4
Participants with RMC received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
14
ES: Cohort 5
Participants with ES received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
62
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6
Participants with ES undergoing optional tumour biopsy received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
69
Chordoma: Cohort 7
Participants with poorly differentiated chordoma (or other chordoma with sponsor approval) received tazemetostat 800 mg BID orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
18
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8
Participants with ES received tazemetostat 1600 mg QD orally in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.
7
Total267

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse event (not related to study treatment)10000200
Overall StudyDeath60314100
Overall StudyDisease progression - clinical35426651
Overall StudyDisease progression - radiological21262211465275
Overall StudyInvestigator discretion10101110
Overall StudyNon-compliance01000110
Overall StudyOther00002210
Overall StudyParticipant enrolled in rollover study00101110
Overall StudyParticipant refused further study treatment01102221
Overall StudyUnacceptable toxicity (related to study treatment)00000100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Synovial Sarcoma: Cohort 2Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3RMC: Cohort 4ES: Cohort 5ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6Chordoma: Cohort 7ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8Total
Age, Continuous37.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.31
38.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
46.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.94
30.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.71
37.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.08
41.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
38.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.49
40.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.74
39.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.89
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants7 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants28 Participants27 Participants13 Participants53 Participants55 Participants17 Participants7 Participants231 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants10 Participants1 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants7 Participants9 Participants1 Participants2 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants11 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants24 Participants28 Participants2 Participants47 Participants54 Participants16 Participants5 Participants200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants12 Participants17 Participants4 Participants23 Participants26 Participants8 Participants4 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants21 Participants15 Participants10 Participants39 Participants43 Participants10 Participants3 Participants154 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 322 / 335 / 323 / 148 / 626 / 692 / 180 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 3228 / 3329 / 3212 / 1458 / 6265 / 6916 / 186 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 3213 / 3311 / 328 / 1425 / 6219 / 697 / 182 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Cohort 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 16 Weeks of Treatment With Tazemetostat

PFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PFS rate at 16 week was estimated. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

Time frame: At 16 Weeks

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Cohort 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 16 Weeks of Treatment With Tazemetostat15.2 Percentage of participants
Primary

Cohort 8: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant. TEAEs were defined as AEs if one of the following conditions met: emerged after the time of first dose administration, having been absent prior to the first dose; re-emerged, having been present but stopped prior to the time of first dose administration; worsened in severity after the time of first dose administration relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous.

Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 148 weeks

Population: Safety population included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 post-dose safety observation recorded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Cohort 8: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs7 Participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Cohort 8: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs2 Participants
Primary

Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the investigator review from start of treatment until progressive disease (PD) or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy or cancer-related surgery, whichever was earlier, as per response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria for primary brain tumors or response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1 criteria for all other solid tumors. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since treatment started. In addition, sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

Time frame: Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)9.4 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)9.4 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)0.0 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)16.1 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)15.9 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7Cohorts 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7: Objective Response Rate (ORR)5.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed response (CR or PR, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria) or who have SD lasting at least 32 weeks from the start of treatment until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.

Time frame: At Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1221.9 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2412.5 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 329.4 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 489.4 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 483.0 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 249.1 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1215.2 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 323.0 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1240.6 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 4812.5 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2421.9 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 3218.8 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1221.4 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2414.3 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 327.1 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 480.0 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 4824.2 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 3225.8 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2429.0 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1245.2 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 4823.2 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 3229.0 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2430.4 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1236.2 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 4811.1 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1250.0 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 3227.8 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2433.3 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 2442.9 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 3214.3 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 4814.3 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 12, 24, 32 and 48Week 1242.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR based on investigator review to the time of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever came first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

Time frame: Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration 28 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat. Only those participants with a confirmed CR or PR (responders) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)29.0 Weeks
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)80.1 Weeks
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)88.0 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)96.1 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)151.6 Weeks
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)119.4 Weeks
Secondary

All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)22.1 Weeks
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)43.4 Weeks
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)37.9 Weeks
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)24.6 Weeks
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)82.4 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)111.4 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)77.7 Weeks
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)49.6 Weeks
Secondary

All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56

OS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the date of death due to any cause. OS rate at 24, 32 and 56 weeks were estimated. Estimates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and 95% CIs using the complementary log-log transformation.

Time frame: At Weeks 24, 32 and 56

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2445.4 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5630.9 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3238.6 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5637.6 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3268.9 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2481.4 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5649.6 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2468.8 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3256.3 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2450.0 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3242.9 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5635.7 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3277.2 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2485.5 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5657.3 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3275.8 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2483.6 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5666.5 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3277.8 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2488.9 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5655.6 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2483.3 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3266.7 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5644.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

Time frame: Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration 28 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)7.9 Weeks
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)8.0 Weeks
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)15.7 Weeks
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)7.3 Weeks
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)23.7 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)16.1 Weeks
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)24.0 Weeks
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)39.9 Weeks
Secondary

All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56

PFS was defined as the interval of time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and the earliest date of PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, as per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. PFS rate at 24, 32 and 56 weeks were estimated. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. Estimates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and 95% CIs using the complementary log-log transformation.

Time frame: At Weeks 24, 32 and 56

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2417.6 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 563.5 Percentage of participants
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3214.1 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 560.0 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3210.6 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2415.9 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5613.8 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2434.4 Percentage of participants
RMC: Cohort 4All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3226.7 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2415.4 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3215.4 Percentage of participants
ES: Cohort 5All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 560.0 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3229.1 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2442.1 Percentage of participants
ES Paired Biopsy: Cohort 6All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5621.3 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3229.3 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2433.8 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5622.6 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3243.6 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2443.6 Percentage of participants
Chordoma: Cohort 7All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5618.2 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 2453.6 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 3253.6 Percentage of participants
ES 1600 mg: Cohort 8All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Weeks 24, 32 and 56Week 5626.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohorts 2 and 8: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR based on investigator assessment from start of treatment until PD or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy or cancer-related surgery, whichever was earlier, as per RANO criteria for primary brain tumors or RECIST v 1.1 criteria for all other solid tumors. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the treatment started. In addition, the sum must have an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

Time frame: Tumor assessment performed at screening and every 8 weeks beginning at Cycle 3 Day 1, until disease progression or the start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first, up to 5.75 years (cycle duration: 28 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tazemetostat.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rhabdoid Tumors: Cohort 1Cohorts 2 and 8: Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 Percentage of participants
Other INI1-negative: Cohort 3Cohorts 2 and 8: Objective Response Rate (ORR)14.3 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026