Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Delorme's Operation in Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02601326

Enrollment

Registered

2015-11-10

Start date

2012-01-31

Completion date

2015-12-31

Last updated

2016-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Rectal Prolapse

Brief summary

A comparative randomized study between laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy and Delorme's procedure in treatment of complete rectal prolapse to ass both efficacy and complications

Detailed description

A comparative randomized study between laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy and Delorme's procedure in treatment of complete rectal prolapse to ass both efficacy and complications. Follow up is scheduled for 18 months to evaluate recurrence, continence state and complications

Interventions

PROCEDUREDelorme's procedure

Transanal excision of rectal mucosa and plication of muscle layer

PROCEDURELaparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy

Laparoscopic fixation of rectum to sacral promontory using mesh

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

16 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* patients with complete rectal prolapse

Exclusion criteria

* patients who underwent previous surgery for complete rectal prolapse * patients unfit for surgery * patients with associated colorectal diseases or pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Recurrence of the condition	18 month	Measured by counting the number of patients with recurrence of rectal prolapse

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026