Skip to content

ACCU-CHEK Connect Personal Diabetes Management Study (PDM CONNECT)

ACCU-CHEK Connect Personal Diabetes Management Study (PDM)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02600845
Enrollment
122
Registered
2015-11-09
Start date
2015-12-30
Completion date
2017-02-20
Last updated
2017-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Brief summary

This post-market, interventional, prospective, single arm, the United States (US) based multi-center study will assess the change in treatment satisfaction of participants who utilize the ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System over a period of 6 months.

Interventions

DEVICEACCU-CHEK

ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System contains ACCU-CHEK Aviva Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System, ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management App, and ACCU-CHEK Connect Online Diabetes Management System.

Sponsors

Roche Diabetes Care
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes for greater than or equal to (\>=) 6 months * Currently using insulin as a component of the diabetes therapy * Allow and be able to provide self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) data at least 1 month prior to study start * SMBG frequency as confirmed by site SMBG data download of participants meter(s): Basal insulin treated participants - SMBG \>=5 times per week and Multiple dose insulin participants - SMBG \>=2 times per day * Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of \>=7.5 percentage (per local laboratory obtained less than or equal to \[\<= 3\] months of Baseline) * Able to read and write in English language * Currently using a Smartphone and have experience with downloading at minimum one application * Smartphone compatibility; must be able to download the ACCU-CHEK Connect system application accordingly * Naive to the ACCU-CHEK Connect system * Willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with insulin pump therapy * Any use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to manage their diabetes during the course of the study * Visually impaired * Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Diagnosed with any clinically significant condition (for example anemia, major organ system disease, infections, psychosis or cognitive impairment) * Participant requires chronic steroid in adrenal suppressive doses, other immuno-modulatory medication or chemotherapy * Participant is the investigator or any sub-investigator, general practitioner, practice staff, pharmacist, research assistant or other staff or relative of those directly involved in the conduct of the study and design of the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Satisfaction: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQc) Score at Week 24Week 24The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24Assessment of HbA1c is an indicator of long-term control of diabetes.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage of Glucose Readings in Target RangeBaseline, Week 24Glucose target range was specified as 70-180 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Mean Blood Glucose LevelBaseline, Week 24Blood glucose is a type of sugar in blood and is measured to assess a participant's control of diabetes.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Glycemic VariabilityBaseline, Week 24Glycemic variability refers to swings in blood glucose levels. Mean glycemic variability is expressed as a standard deviation of blood glucose data. A negative number indicates a decrease in glucose variability. A positive number indicates and increase in glucose variability.
Incidence of HypoglycemiaBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24A hypoglycemic reading was defined as a glucose value that fell below the 70 mg/dL level. The incidence of hypoglycemia was defined as the number of hypoglycemic readings in the interval divided by the total number of blood glucose checks in the interval.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) ScoreBaseline, Week 24Participants rated their level of diabetes distress by answering 17 questions in in the following areas: Regimen-related Distress, Emotional Burden, Diabetes-related Interpersonal Distress and Physician-related Distress (PD) on a 6-point scale: 1=Not a problem to 6=A very serious problem. The Average Total score ranged from 1 (best) to 6 (worst). Results were calculated using a Linear Mixed Model with study group, visit, group-by-visit interaction, baseline DDS, gender, age, and race as fixed effects; and site and subject as random effects. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Percent of Follow-Up Visits With Sufficient SMBG DataUp to Week 24Sufficient SMBG data is based on the ability of the healthcare provider to make informed decisions regarding therapy adjustments.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Blood Glucose Checks at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24An increase in the number of blood glucose checks indicates more glycemic control.
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Frequency at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24An increase in SMBG frequency indicates more glycemic control. The average number of daily SMBG measurements per interval was calculated based on the total number of blood glucose readings recorded during the study visit interval.
Percentage of Blood Glucose Tagged DataWeeks 12 and 24Tagged data specifies the timing of blood glucose recording and includes: fasting, before breakfast, after breakfast, before lunch, after lunch, before dinner, after dinner, and bedtime. The percentage of blood glucose tagged data per interval was calculated as the total number of tagged blood glucose readings during the interval divided by the total number of readings within the interval.
Number of Participants With Competency in Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 24Week 24Competency was defined as appropriate response to high and low glucose values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were identified and recruited from the investigators' established subject populations or from the subject populations of other physicians within the group practice, using protocol-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACCU-CHEK
All participants utilized ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management System containing three primary components: ACCU-CHEK Aviva Connect Blood Glucose Monitoring System intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose, ACCU-CHEK Connect Diabetes Management App indicated as an aid in the treatment of diabetes, and ACCU-CHEK Connect Online Diabetes Management System indicated for use by persons with diabetes or by healthcare professionals in the home or in healthcare facilities.
87
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawal5
Overall StudyNon-compliance with Study Procedures10
Overall StudyReason Not Specified3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicACCU-CHEK
Age, Continuous57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Treatment Satisfaction: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQc) Score at Week 24

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ACCU-CHEKTreatment Satisfaction: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQc) Score at Week 2414.3 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Frequency at Weeks 12 and 24

An increase in SMBG frequency indicates more glycemic control. The average number of daily SMBG measurements per interval was calculated based on the total number of blood glucose readings recorded during the study visit interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline in Mean Daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Frequency at Weeks 12 and 24Week 240.22 glucose checks per dayStandard Deviation 1.205
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline in Mean Daily Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Frequency at Weeks 12 and 24Week 120.45 glucose checks per dayStandard Deviation 1.201
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Blood Glucose Checks at Weeks 12 and 24

An increase in the number of blood glucose checks indicates more glycemic control.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline in the Number of Blood Glucose Checks at Weeks 12 and 24Week 1216.25 blood glucose checksStandard Deviation 35.653
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline in the Number of Blood Glucose Checks at Weeks 12 and 24Week 249.37 blood glucose checksStandard Deviation 35.132
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) Score

Participants rated their level of diabetes distress by answering 17 questions in in the following areas: Regimen-related Distress, Emotional Burden, Diabetes-related Interpersonal Distress and Physician-related Distress (PD) on a 6-point scale: 1=Not a problem to 6=A very serious problem. The Average Total score ranged from 1 (best) to 6 (worst). Results were calculated using a Linear Mixed Model with study group, visit, group-by-visit interaction, baseline DDS, gender, age, and race as fixed effects; and site and subject as random effects. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) Score-0.3 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Glycemic Variability

Glycemic variability refers to swings in blood glucose levels. Mean glycemic variability is expressed as a standard deviation of blood glucose data. A negative number indicates a decrease in glucose variability. A positive number indicates and increase in glucose variability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Glycemic Variability-9.26 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 19.244
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Mean Blood Glucose Level

Blood glucose is a type of sugar in blood and is measured to assess a participant's control of diabetes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Mean Blood Glucose Level-24.79 milligrams per deciliterStandard Deviation 50.813
Secondary

Incidence of Hypoglycemia

A hypoglycemic reading was defined as a glucose value that fell below the 70 mg/dL level. The incidence of hypoglycemia was defined as the number of hypoglycemic readings in the interval divided by the total number of blood glucose checks in the interval.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKIncidence of HypoglycemiaBaseline1.45 hypoglycemic readingsStandard Deviation 3.227
ACCU-CHEKIncidence of HypoglycemiaWeek 121.08 hypoglycemic readingsStandard Deviation 2.151
ACCU-CHEKIncidence of HypoglycemiaWeek 241.48 hypoglycemic readingsStandard Deviation 3.445
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 24

Assessment of HbA1c is an indicator of long-term control of diabetes.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKMean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12-1.07 percentStandard Deviation 1.384
ACCU-CHEKMean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24-0.95 percentStandard Deviation 1.588
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage of Glucose Readings in Target Range

Glucose target range was specified as 70-180 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKMean Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage of Glucose Readings in Target Range14.74 percentStandard Deviation 34.018
Secondary

Number of Participants With Competency in Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 24

Competency was defined as appropriate response to high and low glucose values.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ACCU-CHEKNumber of Participants With Competency in Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 241 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Blood Glucose Tagged Data

Tagged data specifies the timing of blood glucose recording and includes: fasting, before breakfast, after breakfast, before lunch, after lunch, before dinner, after dinner, and bedtime. The percentage of blood glucose tagged data per interval was calculated as the total number of tagged blood glucose readings during the interval divided by the total number of readings within the interval.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKPercentage of Blood Glucose Tagged DataWeek 1284.24 percentageStandard Deviation 24.461
ACCU-CHEKPercentage of Blood Glucose Tagged DataWeek 2486.87 percentageStandard Deviation 21.545
Secondary

Percent of Follow-Up Visits With Sufficient SMBG Data

Sufficient SMBG data is based on the ability of the healthcare provider to make informed decisions regarding therapy adjustments.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was defined as all participants enrolled and trained who had provided data using the ACCU-CHEK Connect system within 14 days of Scheduled Visit 4 during the investigation, and had completed the DTSQc at Week 24. Data from evaluable participants are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACCU-CHEKPercent of Follow-Up Visits With Sufficient SMBG Data91.71 percentage of follow-up visitsStandard Deviation 15.281

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026