Skip to content

Comparison of Rosuvastatin With Atorvastatin in Chronic Periodontitis

1.2% Rosuvastatin Versus 1.2% Atorvastatin Local Drug Delivery in Treatment of Intrabony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02600520
Enrollment
45
Registered
2015-11-09
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2015-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Periodontitis

Brief summary

The present study is designed as a single-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of two local drug delivery systems containing 1.2% RSV gel and 1.2% ATV gel in treatment of intrabony defects in patients with chronic periodontitis as an adjunct to SRP.

Detailed description

Background: Rosuvastatin (RSV) and Atorvastatin (ATV) are known to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and were proposed to have osteostimulative properties by causing osteoblast differentiation in vivo and in vitro as shown by an increase in matrix formation. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 1.2% RSV and 1.2% ATV gel as local drug delivery systems in adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) for the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with chronic periodontitis (CP). Methods: A total of 90 intrabony defects were treated with either 1.2% RSV, 1.2% ATV or placebo gel LDD after SRP. Clinical parameters (plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth and clinical attachment level) were recorded at baseline and 6 months. Radiographic intrabony defect depth change was calculated on standardized radiographs by using image analysis software at 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGSRP with RSV gel LDD

After SRP, 1.2% Rosuvastatin (RSV) gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket

DRUGSRP with ATV gel LDD

After SRP, 1.2% Atorvastatin (ATV) gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket

DRUGSRP with placebo gel LDD

After SRP, placebo gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket

Sponsors

Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy patients with PD ≥5mm or CA loss ≥4mm and vertical bone loss ≥3 mm on intraoral periapical radiographs with no history of periodontal therapy or use of antibiotics in the preceding 6 months were included

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known systemic disease; * known or suspected allergy to statin group; * on systemic statin therapy; * with aggressive periodontitis; * who used tobacco in any form; * alcoholics; * immunocompromised patients; * pregnant or lactating females were excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in intrabony defect depth from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline to 6 monthsRadiographic defect depth reduction (DDR) in the baseline to 6 months interval wiil be measured

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in plaque index (PI) from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline to 6 monthsReduction in plaque index (PI) from baseline to 6 months wiil be measured
Change in modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline to 6 monthsReduction in modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) from baseline to 6 months wiil be measured
Change in probing depth (PD) from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline to 6 monthsReduction in probing depth (PD) from baseline to 6 months wiil be measured
Change in clinical attachment (CA) level from baseline to 6 monthsBaseline to 6 monthsReduction in clinical attachment (CA) level from baseline to 6 months wiil be measured

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026