Performance and Team Pre-critical Staff Before Critical Event in High Fidelity Simulation for Anesthesiology Residents

Improvement of Team Performance With a Pre-critical Staff Within the Team Prior to Admission of Critical Simulated Patient in High Fidelity Simulation Session for Anesthesiology Resident During Their Education Curriculum

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02599584

Acronym

Simstaf&perf

Enrollment

Registered

2015-11-06

Start date

2015-11-30

Completion date

2016-06-30

Last updated

2020-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

behaviour

Brief summary

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and plannification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a liberal preparation team staff of 4 min, suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts.

Detailed description

High fidelity simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur, plannification of team resources, priority in the treatment strategy and effective communication within the team, may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a preparation team staff of 4 min. This staff will be suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts. The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independantly. A checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance. Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. the two groups (preparation staff or no preparation staff) will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALprecritical staff

free pre critical scenario team staff

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

OTHER

Masking

DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Anesthesiology resident in the education simulation curriculum

Exclusion criteria

* no verbal consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
performance	one week (review video)	performance scale cotation (rated from 0 to 100 by 2 independant experts) (technikal and non technikal skills scale)

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
stress	min 0, min 4 and min 15 (just after the scenario)	visual analogic scale (transfer to metrics from 0 to 100) of the stress felt by the residents at the time of the cotation

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026