Skip to content

Transobturator Verus Single Incision Slings

Transobturator Versus Single Incision Slings: 1 Year Results of a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02599051
Enrollment
98
Registered
2015-11-06
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2023-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Brief summary

A randomized control trial to compare the efficacy of the single incision mini-sling to the transobturator sling

Detailed description

Transobturator slings are one type of sling that has become standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence. However, this procedure involves a total of 3 incisions to perform. In contrast, single incision slings have been developed to treat stress urinary incontinence by using only one incision. However, to date the success and complications of these two procedures have not been compared or studied.

Interventions

DEVICEMini-arc

We will place a single incision sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence

DEVICEMonarc

We will place a transobturator sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Sponsors

Cecilia Calvo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence who were planning on undergoing surgery for treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with prior incontinence surgery, a urodynamic diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency and mixed incontinence with a predominance of detrusor overactivity were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Stress Urinary Incontinence1 yearThe primary outcome was presence of leakage during cough stress test(CST) on examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Questionnaire UDI-61 yearResponse to validated questionnaire: Urinary Distress Index(UDI-6) Measures symptoms on three subscales: 1. Irritative 2. Stress 3. Obstructive/Discomfort. The mean value of all questions answered is then multiplied by 25 for the actual score (range 0 to 100) Summary score - Add the scores from the 3 scales together to obtain the summary score (range 0 to 300) The higher the score the greater the perceived impact that pelvic floor dysfunction has on a patient's life.
Subjective Patient Reported Recurrent or Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence1 yearAssess if the patient has any complaint of stress urinary incontinence after surgery in follow up visits. This will be history only, no examination.
Number of Participants Who Completed Self- Assessment of Cure1 yearSelf-assessment of cure is based on 5 point scale, cured, greatly improved, somewhat improved, not improved, and worsened. This is calculated by the number of patients that were analyzed.
Quality of Life Questionnaire IIQ-71 yearResponse to validated questionnaire: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire(IIQ-7) The IIQ measures the impact of urinary incontinence on activities roles, and emotional states. A mean score is derived from each domain, then transferred to give weight to each subscale. Subscale scores range from 0-100. The total IIQ score is calculated by adding the four subscales score with a range of 0-400 possible. A score closer to 0 represents activities not affected at all versus closer to 400 represent activities that were greatly affected.
Quality of Life Questionnaire ICIQ1 yearResponse to validated questionnaire: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire(ICIQ). The ICIQ is a screening tool for incontinence. The scoring scale is 0-21, minimum 0, maximum 21. a higher score indicates greater impairment from incontinence.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Monarc
Placement of a transobturator monarc sling for stress urinary incontinence Monarc: We will place a transobturator sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence
49
Mini-arc
Placement of a single incision mini-arc sling for stress urinary incontinence Mini-arc: We will place a single incision sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence
49
Total98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMini-arcMonarcTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Age, Continuous52.9 years48.9 years50 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 495 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 490 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Stress Urinary Incontinence

The primary outcome was presence of leakage during cough stress test(CST) on examination

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MonarcObjective Stress Urinary Incontinence9 Participants
Mini-arcObjective Stress Urinary Incontinence12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Completed Self- Assessment of Cure

Self-assessment of cure is based on 5 point scale, cured, greatly improved, somewhat improved, not improved, and worsened. This is calculated by the number of patients that were analyzed.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MonarcNumber of Participants Who Completed Self- Assessment of Cure37 Participants
Mini-arcNumber of Participants Who Completed Self- Assessment of Cure31 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire ICIQ

Response to validated questionnaire: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire(ICIQ). The ICIQ is a screening tool for incontinence. The scoring scale is 0-21, minimum 0, maximum 21. a higher score indicates greater impairment from incontinence.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MonarcQuality of Life Questionnaire ICIQ3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Mini-arcQuality of Life Questionnaire ICIQ3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire IIQ-7

Response to validated questionnaire: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire(IIQ-7) The IIQ measures the impact of urinary incontinence on activities roles, and emotional states. A mean score is derived from each domain, then transferred to give weight to each subscale. Subscale scores range from 0-100. The total IIQ score is calculated by adding the four subscales score with a range of 0-400 possible. A score closer to 0 represents activities not affected at all versus closer to 400 represent activities that were greatly affected.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MonarcQuality of Life Questionnaire IIQ-78.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Mini-arcQuality of Life Questionnaire IIQ-712.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire UDI-6

Response to validated questionnaire: Urinary Distress Index(UDI-6) Measures symptoms on three subscales: 1. Irritative 2. Stress 3. Obstructive/Discomfort. The mean value of all questions answered is then multiplied by 25 for the actual score (range 0 to 100) Summary score - Add the scores from the 3 scales together to obtain the summary score (range 0 to 300) The higher the score the greater the perceived impact that pelvic floor dysfunction has on a patient's life.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MonarcQuality of Life Questionnaire UDI-615.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Mini-arcQuality of Life Questionnaire UDI-620.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Secondary

Subjective Patient Reported Recurrent or Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence

Assess if the patient has any complaint of stress urinary incontinence after surgery in follow up visits. This will be history only, no examination.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MonarcSubjective Patient Reported Recurrent or Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence11 participants
Mini-arcSubjective Patient Reported Recurrent or Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence21 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026