Skip to content

Bioavailability of Nasal Naloxone and Injected Naloxone Compared

Bioavailability of Nasal Naloxone and Injected Naloxone Compared. A Randomized, Open Label, 4-way Cross-over Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02598856
Acronym
OPI-15-002
Enrollment
22
Registered
2015-11-06
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drug Overdose

Keywords

Emergency Treatment, Morphine Derivates, Heroin, Antidotes, Administration, Intravenous, Pharmacology, Naloxone, Healthy volunteers, Administration, intramuscular, Administration, intranasal

Brief summary

Opioid overdoses have in the last decade counted for about 230 untimely deaths annually in Norway. The government is currently implementing a strategy for combating this epidemic. Among the actions promoted in this strategy is the distribution of naloxone for intranasal administration. Such administration of naloxone is currently being implemented and tried out around the world, but very little has been done to pharmacologically study this new route of administration of this well known drug, and only 3 open label randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted. A recent guideline from the WHO on community management of opioid overdoses is a comprehensive review of many of the aspects the investigators cover in our research. Regarding both dosage, routes of administration of naloxone and care of these patients in the pre hospital setting. The WHO calls for nasal formulations with a higher concentration, as well as focuses on the current wide spread off label use of nasal naloxone as a problem and identifies several research questions of critical importance and very low evidence.The current study, together with our research group's previous and future studies, aims to provide data for the development of a medicinal product with marketing authorisation for use in pre-hospital overdoses. This to contribute to public health measures for opioid users and those around them.

Interventions

DRUGIntranasal (IN) naloxone 1x

Administered as 100 μl 14.0 mg/ml (1.4 mg naloxone) by Aptar Unitdose device as one puff in one nostril

DRUGIntranasal (IN) naloxone 2

Administered as 2x 100 μl 14 mg/ml (2.8 mg naloxone) by Aptar Unitdose device as two puffs within the same nostril with 3 minutes interval

Administered as 1 ml Naloxon B Braun 0.4 mg/ml (0.4 mg naloxone), in an intravenous cannula in the opposite arm of which the blood samples are drawn from. IV bolus will be given rapidly (in less than 5 seconds)

Naloxone administered as 2 ml Naloxon B Braun 0.4 mg/ml (0.8 mg naloxone) in a Braun Omnifix 2.5 ml syringe using a BD Microlance 3 21G (green) 0.8x40 mm needle in the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant arm

Sponsors

St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
A/S Den norske Eterfabrikk
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Smerud Medical Research International AS
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

In order to participate in this study the subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: * Provision of a signed written informed consent * ECG without any pathological abnormalities * Have a BMI range of 18.5- 26.0 kg/m * Female subject with child bearing potential must use high efficacy contraception. For the purpose of this study acceptable contraception is defined as sterilization, oral contraceptives, patch, implants, vaginal ring, hormonal IUD or copper IUD through out the study until the last visit. * Laboratory values within reference values for the following haematology and biochemistry tests: * Haemoglobin * Creatinine * ASAT * ALAT * Gamma GT

Exclusion criteria

In order to participate in the study subjects must not meet any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Peak plasma concentration (Cmax)4 daysCmax will be compared for single dose IN, IM and IV naloxone
Difference in systemic exposure: Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC-0last)4 daysAUC 0-last will be compared for single dose IN, IM and IV naloxone
Difference in dose adjusted systemic exposure: Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC-0inf)4 daysAUC0-inf will be compared for single dose IN, IM and IV naloxone
Difference in time at which the Cmax is observed (Tmax)4 daysTmax will be compared for single dose IN, IM and IV naloxone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute bioavailability4 daysassessed by comparing dose adjusted systemic exposure (AUC0-last) of IN and IV naloxone
Relative bioavailability4 daysassessed by comparing dose adjusted systemic exposure (AUC0-last) of IN and IM naloxone
Dose proportionality4 daysassessed by comparing systemic exposure (AUC0-last) following one and two doses of 1.4 mg of IN naloxone in the same nostril.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026