Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Participants With International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

A Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Transfusion-Dependent Subjects With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) That is Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02598661
Enrollment
289
Registered
2015-11-06
Start date
2016-01-12
Completion date
2026-10-13
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Imetelstat Sodium, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to ESAs, Transfusion dependent, IMerge

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in terms of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI), of imetelstat sodium to placebo in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment in Phase 3 study. A separate Ventricular Repolarization Substudy (QTc Substudy) will evaluate the effect of imetelstat sodium on ventricular repolarization. An Extension Phase has been included to allow continued treatment for those participants who are benefitting from imetelstat sodium and to continue to evaluate the long-term safety, overall survival (OS), and disease progression, including progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in transfusion-dependent participants with low or immediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2/3, multicenter study of imetelstat sodium in which 289 participants were enrolled. * Phase 2 is an open-label, single-arm design to assess the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium. A total of 57 participants were enrolled in Phase 2, including the expansion cohort. * Phase 3 is a double-blind, randomized design to compare the efficacy of imetelstat sodium with placebo. In the Phase 3 study, 178 participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo, respectively. * In a separate Ventricular Repolarization (VR) Substudy (QTc Substudy), 54 participants were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles in the VR substudy, a participant has no significant change to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant may be unblinded. If the participant was on placebo treatment, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium. The Extension Phase was initiated at the end of the Phase 3 study (24 months after the last participant was randomized in the Phase 3) and will continue until participants who entered Phase 3 study participated in the study for up to 5 years from the first dose of imetelstat sodium (including treatment and follow-up), or 3 years of post-treatment follow-up from the last dose of study treatment, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a participant is lost to follow-up. Participants ongoing on imetelstat sodium and considered to be benefiting from treatment per Investigator in the Phase 3 Study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, have the option to continue receiving imetelstat sodium in the Extension Phase. Participants in the follow-up phase for the Phase 3 study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy have the option to continue the follow-up in the Extension Phase. The Phase 2, Phase 3, and VR Substudy all consist of 3 phases: a Screening phase (up to 28 days); a treatment phase; and a post-treatment follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first). The Extension Phase of the study will consist of an extended treatment phase and an extended follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first).

Interventions

Imetelstat sodium IV infusion.

DRUGPlacebo

Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo IV infusion.

Sponsors

Geron Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Man or woman greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age * Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (Phase 2) or randomization (Phase 3). In Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, diagnosis of MDS or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) according to WHO criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to C1D1 * International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low Risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS * Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, defined as requiring at least 4 RBC units transfused over an 8-week period during the 16 weeks prior to Study Entry; pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) should be less than or equal to (≤) 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) to count towards the 4 units total * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to imetelstat sodium or its excipients * Participant has received an investigational drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Study Entry or is currently enrolled in an investigational study * Prior treatment with imetelstat sodium * Have received corticosteroids greater than (\>) 30 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent, or growth factor treatment within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Has received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or any chemotherapy, immunomodulatory, or immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry (8 weeks for long-acting ESAs) * Phase 3: a) Prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (example \[eg\], azacitidine, decitabine); b) Prior treatment with lenalidomide Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)Up to 5 years in Phase 2Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target PopulationUp to 5 years in Phase 2Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks PeriodUp to 3.7 years in Phase 3Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsAdverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks PeriodUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TIUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TIUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the InvestigatorUp to 5 years in Phase 2As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with \>5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week IntervalUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion BurdenUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth FactorsUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors AdministrationUp to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat SodiumPre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical EncountersUp to 3.7 years in Phase 3Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of HospitalizationUp to 3.7 years in Phase 3Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.
QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORTymara Berry, MD

Geron Corporation

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled in Phase 2 at 48 study sites and in the Phase 3 Study at 77 study sites. Data is reported for the Phase 2, Phase 3 and QTc substudy up to the primary completion date (PCD) of 13 October 2023. Enrolment in Extension phase started after October 2023 and analyses for the participants in extension phase is still ongoing, hence data for extension phase will be reported at study completion date in 2026.

Pre-assignment details

57 participants with MDS received Imetelstat Sodium in Phase 2, followed by Phase 3 where 178 participants were randomized to receive either Imetelstat Sodium or Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo. 54 participants enrolled in QTc Substudy to receive either Imetelstat Sodium or Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium
Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg was allowed before Protocol Amendment 2.
57
Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium
Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
118
Phase 3: Placebo
Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
60
QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium
Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
35
QTc Substudy: Placebo
Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles a participant has no significant change to pRBC transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.
18
Total288

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous70.1 years70.4 years71.7 years69.7 years67.8 years69.9 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
48 Participants100 Participants48 Participants29 Participants15 Participants240 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants12 Participants7 Participants6 Participants3 Participants36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants14 Participants8 Participants2 Participants2 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
46 Participants95 Participants48 Participants29 Participants15 Participants233 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants47 Participants20 Participants8 Participants2 Participants102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants71 Participants40 Participants27 Participants16 Participants186 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
24 / 503 / 735 / 11815 / 591 / 350 / 140 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 506 / 7117 / 11858 / 5933 / 3512 / 1413 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 501 / 741 / 11813 / 598 / 353 / 140 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

Population: Phase 2: Target Population included participants without prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) or lenalidomide use and non del(5q) in karyotype at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population42.1 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)36.8 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 3: The ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period39.8 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period15.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.9, 36.89]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval

Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval3.0 number of RBC transfusions unitsStandard Deviation 3.48
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval3.1 number of RBC transfusions unitsStandard Deviation 3.62
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval3.4 number of RBC transfusions unitsStandard Deviation 2.13
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)

As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

Time frame: Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Set included all densely, and sparsely sampled participants who had received at least 1 dose of imetelstat sodium and who had sufficient data to calculate PK parameters for plasma imetelstat sodium. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)559 hour*micrograms per milliliter(h*mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 43.2
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration

Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants who had at least 1 dose of myeloid growth factors in Phase 2 and Phase 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration1.43 weeks
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration0.71 weeks
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration3.14 weeks
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI

Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated 8-week TI Responder Analysis Set included participants in the All Treated Analysis Set who achieved 8-week RBC TI.~Phase 3: ITT 8-week TI Responder Analysis Set included all participants in the ITT Analysis Set who achieved 8-week RBC TI.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI69.6 weeks
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI51.6 weeks
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI13.3 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.105, 0.586]Log Rank
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Set included all densely, and sparsely sampled participants who had received at least 1 dose of imetelstat sodium and who had sufficient data to calculate PK parameters for plasma imetelstat sodium. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)89.5 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 27.3
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths

TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame: Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2 and Phase 3: Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants with AEs50 Participants
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants who died24 Participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants who died3 Participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants with AEs6 Participants
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants with AEs117 Participants
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants who died35 Participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants with AEs59 Participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and DeathsParticipants who died15 Participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.

Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)55.3 months
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)40.4 months
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)NA months
p-value: 0.94995% CI: [0.526, 1.823]Log Rank
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors

Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors33 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors35.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors5.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium

As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

Population: The Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis Set included all participants who had at least one quantifiable post-dose determination on biomarker, efficacy or safety parameters as defined in the related Pharmacodynamics analysis plan. Overall number of participants analysed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium16.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006

As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 200661.4 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 200663.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 200651.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.11295% CI: [-4.1, 27.56]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period

Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period24.6 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period28.0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period3.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [12.64, 34.18]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden

Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden-62.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.36
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden-57.75 percent changeStandard Deviation 50.22
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden-51.01 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.606
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)34.2 months
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)NA months
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.

Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.~Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)NA months
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)NA months
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)NA months
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI

Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated 24-week TI Responder Analysis Set included participants in the All Treated Analysis Set who achieved 24-week RBC TI.~Phase 3: ITT 24-week TI Responder Analysis Set included all participants in the ITT Analysis Set who achieved 24-week RBC TI.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI8.79 weeks
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI8.43 weeks
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI3.79 weeks
Secondary

Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)

Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 2: All Treated 8-week TI Responder Analysis Set included participants in the All Treated Analysis Set who achieved 8-week RBC TI.~Phase 3: ITT 8-week TI Responder Analysis Set included all participants in the ITT Analysis Set who achieved 8-week RBC TI.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)8.29 weeks
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)9.29 weeks
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)8.29 weeks
Secondary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator

As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.

Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

Population: Phase 2: All Treated Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the InvestigatorPercentage of participants with CR8.8 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the InvestigatorPercentage of participants with PR0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the InvestigatorPercentage of participants with mCR12.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization

Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.

Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants who were hospitalized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization8.0 days
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization16.5 days
Secondary

Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters

Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters39.0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters38.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10\^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10\^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with \>5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.

Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Population: Phase 3: ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomized into the Phase 3 study. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with \>5% baseline bone marrow aspirate blasts per central pathology reviewer's assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with CR0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with PR0 percentage of participants
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with mCR0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with CR0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with PR0 percentage of participants
Phase 3: PlaceboPhase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Percentage of participants with mCR0 percentage of participants
Secondary

QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)

Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)

Population: The QTc substudy analysis set included all participants who participated in QTc substudy and received at least one dose of study drug, with measurements at baseline as well as on-treatment with at least 1 post-dose time point with a ΔQTcF value. By-time Point Analysis Set included each post-baseline time point that had a non-missing change-from-baseline observation. Number analysed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 0.5 hr post-dose4.2 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 1.54
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 1 hr post-dose5.4 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 1.47
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 2 hr post-dose5.5 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 1.56
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 4 hr post-dose1.8 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2.43
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 6 hr post-dose1.7 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2.37
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 8 hr post-dose2.3 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2.53
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 6 hr post-dose-1.1 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 3.12
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 0.5 hr post-dose1.9 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2.09
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 4 hr post-dose1.1 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 3.28
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 1 hr post-dose0.4 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 8 hr post-dose-3.4 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 3.36
Phase 3: PlaceboQTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)Change at 2 hr post-dose3.7 milliseconds (ms)Standard Error 2.12
Other Pre-specified

Extension Phase: Number of Participants With AEs

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. AEs included clinically significant vital signs measurements, clinical laboratory values and electrocardiograms (ECGs) changes.

Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Other Pre-specified

Extension Phase: Overall Survival

Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Other Pre-specified

Extension Phase: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Survival

Progression free survival will be assessed as the time interval from the end of the Phase 3 study until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a subject is lost to follow-up. As per IWG criteria disease progression is defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 percent (%) decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years in the extension phase

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026