Skip to content

Patient Convenience Study

Non-interventional Study Describing Patients' Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment and Treatment Convenience When Treated With Pradaxa or Vitamin K Antagonist for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02597920
Enrollment
1852
Registered
2015-11-05
Start date
2015-11-11
Completion date
2017-01-30
Last updated
2019-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The aim of this non-interventional study is to describe patient's perception of anticoagulant treatment when using Pradaxa® to prevent stroke and systemic embolism while suffering from atrial fibrillation (according to its approved indication in the approved dosages of 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) in comparison to standard care using Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cohort A: 1. A. Written informed consent prior to participation 2. A. Female and male patients \>= 18 years of age with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. 3. A. At least 3 months of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment. 4. A. Patients switched to Pradaxa® according Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion. OR Cohort B: 1. B. Written informed consent prior to participation. 2. B. Female and male patients \>= 18 years of age newly diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous treatment for stroke prevention (no use of any oral anticoagulant (OAC) within one year prior to enrolment). 3. B. Stroke prevention treatment initiated with Pradaxa® or VKA according to Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication to the use of Pradaxa® or VKA as described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). 2. Patients receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for any other condition than stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. 3. Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device. 4. Current participation in an European registry on the use of oral anticoagulation in AF.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment DurationBaselineVitamin K Antagonist (VKA) treatment duration at baseline is only applicable for Cohort A patients and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.
Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreBaselineCHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score and HAS-BLED bleeding risk score at baseline are patient characteristics.
Patient Characterization at Baseline - Creatinine ClearanceBaselineCreatinine clearance at baseline is a measure of the patient's kidney function and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.
Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentBaseline, Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA), Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).The PACT-Q is a self-administered questionnaire which was developed as a means to investigate patients´ satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment and treatment convenience in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score (CDS). Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score (SDS). High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Baseline, Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).
Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsVisit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). Propensity score matching method is used to identify matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Only the matched patients in each treatment group are summarized and used for comparison.
Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersBaselineCategorical parameters of the patient characteristics at baseline included age, gender, Stroke- and/or bleeding related risk factors in medical history and at baseline (MH), co-morbidities (CoMo), concomitant therapies (CM) and dosing of Pradaxa® (DoP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineBaselineThe PACT-Q1 is composed of a single dimension (7 items), covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment, and was to be administered before treatment initiation. The 7 items are: A1: How confident are you that your anticoagulant treatment will prevent blood clots? A2: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will relieve some of the symptoms you experience? A3: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will cause side effects such as minor bruises or bleeding? A4: How important is it for you to have an anticoagulant treatment that is easy to take? A5: How concerned are you about making mistakes when taking your anticoagulant treatment? A6: How important is it for you to take care of your anticoagulant treatment by yourself? A7: How concerned are you about how much you pay for your anticoagulant treatment? Responses ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/ Completely/ Very much).
Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second AssessmentVisit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Non-interventional study (NIS) on patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1852 patients were enrolled, out of which 1822 were found eligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A Pradaxa®
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who were using Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy for at least 3 months for stroke prevention before entering the study and were switched to Pradaxa®, received 110 or 150 milligram (mg) twice daily dose of Pradaxa® hard capsules containing Dabigatran etexilate (active ingredient: Dabigatran).
585
Cohort B Pradaxa®
Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, not previously treated with an anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke, and initiated on twice daily dose of 110 or 150 mg Pradaxa® hard capsules containing Dabigatran etexilate (active ingredient: Dabigatran).
1,159
Cohort B VKA
Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, not previously treated with an anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke, and initiated on VKA therapy. The choice of vitamin K antagonist and the appropriate dosing was at the discretion of the physician.
78
Total1,822

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up790
Overall StudyOther100
Overall StudyOther adverse event20300
Overall StudyOther than specified10315
Overall StudyRefuse to continue in the study3131
Overall StudyWorsening of other pre-existing disease010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A Pradaxa®Cohort B Pradaxa®Cohort B VKATotal
Age, Continuous73.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
72.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
74.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
73.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Age, Customized
≥ 65 and < 75 years
213 Participants424 Participants22 Participants659 Participants
Age, Customized
< 65 years
83 Participants207 Participants10 Participants300 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 75 years
289 Participants528 Participants46 Participants863 Participants
CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score at baseline
High risk (score >=2)
537 Participants1033 Participants75 Participants1645 Participants
CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score at baseline
Intermediate risk (score = 1)
48 Participants126 Participants3 Participants177 Participants
Creatinine clearance at baseline
<30 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
0 Participants0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Creatinine clearance at baseline
30 to < 50 mL/min
85 Participants150 Participants23 Participants258 Participants
Creatinine clearance at baseline
50 to < 80 mL/min
277 Participants510 Participants25 Participants812 Participants
Creatinine clearance at baseline
≥ 80 mL/min
168 Participants371 Participants17 Participants556 Participants
Creatinine clearance at baseline
Missing
55 Participants128 Participants6 Participants189 Participants
HAS-BLED bleeding risk score at baseline
High risk (score >=3)
197 Participants128 Participants19 Participants344 Participants
HAS-BLED bleeding risk score at baseline
Low risk (score < 3)
388 Participants1031 Participants59 Participants1478 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Community health center
24 Participants56 Participants12 Participants92 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Health Maintenance Organisation
7 Participants6 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Medical / academic health center
86 Participants143 Participants13 Participants242 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Other
11 Participants22 Participants0 Participants33 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Other health care corporation
16 Participants8 Participants3 Participants27 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Other hospital
51 Participants140 Participants10 Participants201 Participants
Owner of medical practice
Physician or physician group
390 Participants783 Participants39 Participants1212 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, CustomizedNA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants
Region of Enrollment
Northern Europe
252 Participants447 Participants39 Participants738 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Southern Europe
333 Participants712 Participants39 Participants1084 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
258 Participants520 Participants43 Participants821 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
327 Participants639 Participants35 Participants1001 Participants
Speciality of treating physician
Cardiologist
548 Participants1087 Participants67 Participants1702 Participants
Speciality of treating physician
General practitioner
23 Participants7 Participants2 Participants32 Participants
Speciality of treating physician
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Speciality of treating physician
Other specialist
14 Participants64 Participants8 Participants86 Participants
Type of hospital or practise
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Type of hospital or practise
Other
5 Participants18 Participants0 Participants23 Participants
Type of hospital or practise
Private
373 Participants753 Participants44 Participants1170 Participants
Type of hospital or practise
Public
207 Participants387 Participants33 Participants627 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 5855 / 1,1591 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5850 / 1,1590 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 5858 / 1,1592 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups

The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). Propensity score matching method is used to identify matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Only the matched patients in each treatment group are summarized and used for comparison.

Time frame: Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible. PACT-Q2 score obtained after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure was excluded from the summary for that particular visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsCDS-Visit 278.3 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsCDS-Visit 380.3 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsSDS-Visit 265.9 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsSDS-Visit 368.4 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort B VKAMean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsSDS-Visit 358.8 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Cohort B VKAMean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsCDS-Visit 269.1 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Cohort B VKAMean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsSDS-Visit 258.0 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Cohort B VKAMean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment GroupsCDS-Visit 369.5 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Comparison: Between group comparison of Visit 3 SDSp-value: 0.0004Propensity score matching method
Comparison: Between group comparison of Visit 2 CDSp-value: 0.0005Propensity score matching method
Comparison: Between group comparison of Visit 3 CDSp-value: 0.0002Propensity score matching method
Comparison: Between group comparison of Visit 2 SDSp-value: 0.0002Propensity score matching method
Primary

Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment

The PACT-Q is a self-administered questionnaire which was developed as a means to investigate patients´ satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment and treatment convenience in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score (CDS). Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score (SDS). High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Baseline, Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA), Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible. PACT-Q2 score obtained after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure was excluded from the summary for that particular visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentCDS-Baseline63.4 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentCDS-Visit 277.3 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentCDS-Visit 379.2 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentSDS-Baseline53.8 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentSDS-Visit 267.7 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline AssessmentSDS-Visit 370.0 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13
Comparison: Within group comparison of Baseline CDS with that of Visit 2.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Within group comparison of Baseline CDS with that of Visit 3.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Within group comparison of Baseline SDS with that of Visit 2.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Within group comparison of Baseline SDS with that of Visit 3.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Primary

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score

CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score and HAS-BLED bleeding risk score at baseline are patient characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreCHA2DS2-VASc3.4 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreHAS-BLED2.1 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Cohort B VKAPatient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreCHA2DS2-VASc3.2 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort B VKAPatient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreHAS-BLED1.7 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Cohort B VKAPatient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreCHA2DS2-VASc3.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Cohort B VKAPatient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score and HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk ScoreHAS-BLED2.0 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Duration

Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) treatment duration at baseline is only applicable for Cohort A patients and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Duration4.44 YearsStandard Deviation 3.65
Primary

Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical Parameters

Categorical parameters of the patient characteristics at baseline included age, gender, Stroke- and/or bleeding related risk factors in medical history and at baseline (MH), co-morbidities (CoMo), concomitant therapies (CM) and dosing of Pradaxa® (DoP).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Other Conditions8.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: NSAIDS0.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Proton pump inhibitors18.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Thromboembolism5.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Male55.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antiarrhythmic agents29.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Cardiovascular Conditions79.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 65 and < 75 years36.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Lipid modifying agents45.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Bleedings3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antihypertensives84.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: H2-receptor antagonists2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Other Conditions21.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Female44.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: < 65 years14.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Verapamil3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Thromboembolism14.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersDoP: 110 mg twice daily55.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antidepressants4.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Cardiovascular Conditions22.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 75 years49.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Amiodarone3.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Bleedings4.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersDoP: 150 mg twice daily44.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antithrombotic agents7.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersDoP: 150 mg twice daily42.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: < 65 years17.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 65 and < 75 years36.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 75 years45.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Male55.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Female44.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Thromboembolism9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Cardiovascular Conditions18.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Bleedings2.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Other Conditions6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Thromboembolism4.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Cardiovascular Conditions79.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Bleedings2.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Other Conditions18.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antihypertensives81.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Lipid modifying agents42.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antiarrhythmic agents25.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Proton pump inhibitors15.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antithrombotic agents10.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Amiodarone5.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antidepressants4.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Verapamil2.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: H2-receptor antagonists0.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: NSAIDS1.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersDoP: 110 mg twice daily57.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: H2-receptor antagonists0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Proton pump inhibitors26.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Bleedings7.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 75 years59.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antithrombotic agents21.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Cardiovascular Conditions21.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: < 65 years12.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Amiodarone2.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Thromboembolism12.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: NSAIDS2.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antidepressants6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Bleedings7.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Female55.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Other Conditions25.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Lipid modifying agents51.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersAge: ≥ 65 and < 75 years28.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antihypertensives84.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Cardiovascular Conditions82.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersGender: Male44.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCoMo: Thromboembolism9.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Verapamil1.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersCM: Antiarrhythmic agents19.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical ParametersMH: Other Conditions9.0 Percentage of participants
Primary

Patient Characterization at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance

Creatinine clearance at baseline is a measure of the patient's kidney function and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Patient Characterization at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance74.40 millilitre/ minute [mL/min]Standard Deviation 27.08
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance75.89 millilitre/ minute [mL/min]Standard Deviation 26.6
Cohort B VKAPatient Characterization at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance63.83 millilitre/ minute [mL/min]Standard Deviation 37.55
Secondary

Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at Baseline

The PACT-Q1 is composed of a single dimension (7 items), covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment, and was to be administered before treatment initiation. The 7 items are: A1: How confident are you that your anticoagulant treatment will prevent blood clots? A2: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will relieve some of the symptoms you experience? A3: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will cause side effects such as minor bruises or bleeding? A4: How important is it for you to have an anticoagulant treatment that is easy to take? A5: How concerned are you about making mistakes when taking your anticoagulant treatment? A6: How important is it for you to take care of your anticoagulant treatment by yourself? A7: How concerned are you about how much you pay for your anticoagulant treatment? Responses ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/ Completely/ Very much).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible. PACT-Q1 score at Visit 1 obtained after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure was excluded from the summary.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA32.7 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA52.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA23.1 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA64.1 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA44.2 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA72.9 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort A Pradaxa®Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA13.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA72.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA13.7 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA22.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA32.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA43.8 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA52.9 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Cohort B VKADescription of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at BaselineA63.9 Units on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second Assessment

The PACT-Q2 is composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction are summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores are more favorable. The two dimension scores are presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).

Time frame: Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).

Population: Eligible patients: All patients who took the prescribed treatment and without specific important protocol violations are eligible. PACT-Q2 score obtained after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure was excluded from the summary for that particular visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second AssessmentCDS-Visit 277.3 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second AssessmentCDS-Visit 379.2 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second AssessmentSDS-Visit 267.7 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Cohort A Pradaxa®Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second AssessmentSDS-Visit 370.0 Units on ScaleStandard Deviation 13
Comparison: Within group comparison of Visit 2 CDS with that of Visit 3.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test
Comparison: Within group comparison of Visit 2 SDS with that of Visit 3.p-value: <0.0001Paired t-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026