A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Either Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine or Obinutuzumab Plus (+) Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CHOP) in Participants With Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Rituximab + CHOP in Participants With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.

Primary end point was positron emission tomography (PET) CR at EOI by IRC according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\</=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \</=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/immunohistochemistry (IHC)-negative bone marrow morphology. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL participants with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of relapsed/refractory \[r/r\] FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Atezo-G-Benda: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy5,6 & D1,15 of Cy2,3 (1Cy:21/28 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction:Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy:21 days), Cy2D1:0.5h postinfusion; Maintenance:Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,3,4,7,15,23, Month 2 D1: 0.5h postinfusion; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was within 5 hour prior to dose for Cy2,3,5,6 during induction phase and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. infusion length: 30-60 minutes.

Time frame: Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,8,9,10,11,12,16,20,25 (1Cy:21 days), 0.5h postinfusion of D1 of Cy2,9; at 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who provided at least one pharmacokinetic (PK) sample. 0 represents no data was collected at that cycle.

Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycle (Cy) 1 and within 5 hour prior to dose for other cycles (Cy 2,5,6) and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Infusion duration for administration of first infusion should begin at an initial rate of 50 milligrams per hour (mg/hour). If no reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 100 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour.

Time frame: Induction: Predose, 0.5 hour (h) postinfusion on Day (D) 1 of Cy1,2,5,6 (1Cy: 21/28 days); Maintenance: Predose, 0.5h postinfusion on Day 1 of Month 1,3,7,15,23; 120 days & 1 year of last dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who provided at least one pharmacokinetic (PK) sample.

Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycle 1 and within 5 hour prior to dose for other cycles (Cycles 2,5,8) during induction phase and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Infusion duration for administration of first infusion should begin at an initial rate of 50 mg/hour. If no infusion-related or hypersensitivity reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 50 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour. If no reaction occurs, increase the infusion rate in 100 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes to a maximum of 400 mg/hour.

Time frame: Predose, 0.5h postinfusion on D1 of Cy1,2,5,8 (1Cy: 21 days); at 120 days and 1 year after last rituximab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and who provided at least one PK sample.

Atezo-G-CHOP: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1 Cy: 21 days); Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,2,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years); Atezo-R-CHOP: Predose on D1 of Cy 2,3,5,8,16,25 (1 Cy: 21 days); at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). Predose time point was any time prior to dose for Cycles 2,3,5,6,8 during induction phase, for Cycles 16,25 during consolidation treatment, and for Months 1 to 24 during maintenance phase. Atezo-G-Benda: Induction: Predose on D1 of Cy2,3,5,6 (1Cy: 28 days), Cy3D15: Predose; ; Maintenance: Predose on D1 of Month 1,4,7,15,23; at 120 days and 1 year of last atezolizumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years). The percentage of participants with positive results for ATAs to atezolizumab at baseline and at post-baseline time points are reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years (assessed at Baseline, 6 to 8 weeks after Day [D] 1 of Cycle [Cy] 6 or 8 (1Cy: 21 or 28 days), then every 2 months up to 24 months, at 35 days of last dose, and at every 3 months post-treatment follow-up [up 4 years])

Population: All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients that received at least one dose of atezolizumab.

Tumor response assessment was performed by the investigator according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. 90% confidence interval (CI) for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Complete response according to modified Cheson 2007 criteria using PET/CT scan: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population. Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Complete response according to the modified Cheson 2007 criteria using PET/CT scan: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. Partial Response (PR): at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All PET evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Induction: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Cy1,5,8 (1Cy: 21 days); Maintenance: at 120 days and 1 year of last rituximab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug in the Atezo-R-CHOP cohort.

Induction: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Cy1,5,6 (1Cy: 21/28 days); Maintenance: Predose (any time prior to dose) on D1 of Month 1; at 120 days and 1 year of last obinutuzumab dose or at treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years)

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 4 years

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug in the Atezo-G-Benda cohort

Tumor response assessment was performed by investigator according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. OR: a response of CR or PR. CR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes & extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PR with a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than \[\>\] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Objective response: having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Tumor response assessment was performed by IRC according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. OR defined as a response of CR or PR. CR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with/without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PR: a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than \[\>\] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).

Objective response: having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. All positron emission tomography (PET) evaluable 1L FL and 1L DLBCL patients with at least one dose of atezolizumab were included in efficacy population.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months

Population: Only Atezo-G-Benda and Atezo-R-Chop cohorts were evaluated for efficacy. 2 participants excluded from Atezo-G-Benda cohort (diagnosis of r/r FL). 2 participants excluded in R-Chop-Atezo cohort (they were excluded prior to Cycle 2, were not treated with atezolizumab).