Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MONotherapy of TiviCAY® Versus a Triple Therapy in HIV-1-infected Patients

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Dolutegravir Monotherapy (Tivicay®) Versus the Maintenance of a Successful Triple Therapy Using Abacavir + Lamivudine + Dolutegravir (Triumeq®) in HIV-1- Infected Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02596334
Acronym
MONCAY
Enrollment
158
Registered
2015-11-04
Start date
2015-12-23
Completion date
2018-06-23
Last updated
2018-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

HIV-1 infected patient, monotherapy, dolutegravir

Brief summary

Triple antiretroviral regimens have greatly improved the prognosis of patients living with HIV (PLHIV). Patients virologically controlled and having a good immune restoration can have a life expectancy close or equal to that of people not infected with HIV.\[1\] However, this is under the condition of a lifetime maintenance of an undetectable plasma viral load (pVL) (\<50 cp/ml). On the other hand it is well established that aging increases comorbidities among PLHIV and the burden of co-medications.\[2\] This also has the consequence of frequent drug-drug interactions. In this context it is important to decrease pills burden, side-effects and drug-drug interactions, while maintaining undetectability. Currently, there is a strong interest for medical research to validate lightened regimens (i.e. bithérapies \[3-7\] and monothérapies \[8,9\], particularly in a maintenance strategy, with the primary objective of reducing burden of pills and side effects. Several monotherapy trials using a boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) showed high level of viral suppression, even if this proportion was not always non-inferior to maintaining a triple therapy. \[8,9\] Fortunately, when virological failure occurred under monotherapy virologic suppression was easily restored by the addition of two NRTI. Patients who are most likely to maintain viral suppression under a reduced scheme are those that have a high nadir (\> 100 CD4 / mm3), no previous AIDS event and a sustained virologic suppression (\>12 months). Monotherapy is the option that best reduces the burden of pills and the risk of side effects or drug-drug interactions. It must be considered using very powerful molecule that harbor a strong binding to its ligand in order to minimize the risk of selecting resistant mutants in the case of virologic failure. To be as simple as possible in its use, it must be a single agent administered as a single dose once a day and not boosted if possible. The molecule must have very good tolerance. Finally, to be effective in viral sanctuaries this molecule should have a good (or sufficient) diffusion to ensure effective Cmin on wild viral strains. Dolutegravir meets all these exigences.\[10\] In addition, our team recently presented results of a pilot study showing that the switch of a successful combined antiretroviral regimen to dolutegravir monotherapy maintained undetectable viral load (\<20 cp/ml) after a median of 7 months (range 6.5-10 months).

Interventions

DRUGdolutegravir 50mg +abacavir 600mg +lamivudine 300mg
DRUGdolutegravir

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1-infected patients with no previous AIDS event (excluding a healed tuberculosis); * Current antiretroviral treatment associating dolutegravir + abacavir + lamivudine for at least 1 month; * Nadir CD4 ≥ 100/mm3; * Plasma RNA viral load \< 50 copies/ml for at least 12 months; * Plasma RNA viral load \<20 or 40 copies/ml (according to the threshold of the method used by local laboratory) at the screening visit; * No documented virologic failure or known resistance to any integrase inhibitor, * Patient having provided a written consent; * Patients follow-up possible in ambulatory; * Patient age \> 18 years; * Covered by health insurance

Exclusion criteria

* Non-compliant patient * Subject is pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential and without contraception; * Active opportunistic infections (defining AIDS); * Known hypersensibility to abacavir or lamivudine or dolutegravir; * Patients harboring HLA B\*5701; * Major overweight (BMI ≥ 40); * Weight \<40 kg; * Creatinine clearance \< 50ml/min; * Cirrhosis or severe liver failure (factor V \< 50%); * Life Prognosis threatened within 6 months; * Circumstances that may impair judgment or understanding of the information given to the patient; * Co-medication with carbamazepin, oxcarbamazepin, fosphenytoïn, phenobarbital, phenytoïn, primidon, St John's wort or dofetilid; * Malabsorption syndromes; * The following laboratory criteria: * Serum AST,ALT \> 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Thrombocytopenia with platelet count \< 50.000/ml * Anemia with hemoglobin \< 8g/dl * Polynuclear neutrophil count \< 500/mm3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral LoadWeek 24Percentage of patients having a viral load \<50 copies/ml in each arm at week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral loadbetween Week 4 and Week 48Percentage of patients having a confirmed viral load \> 50 copies/ml between week 4 and week 48
Delta CD 4until Week 48delta CD4 in each arms from Baseline to W48, comparison between arms
Residual activation measures (sub study)Week 24CD4+CD38+DR+, CD8+CD38+DR+
Residual activation marker measures (sub study)Week 24sCD14, sCD163,
Pro-inflammatory cytokins measures (sub study)Week 24TNFα, IFNγ, IL6, IP-10
Inflammatory marker measures (sub study)Week 24CRPus
virus genotypeUntil Week 48Evolution of viruses genotype profiles of patients who present a virologic failure
Lipidic profiles48 weeksBiological parameters evolution in each arm
HIV DNA evolutionbetween day 0 and week 48HIV DNA evolution in each arm from baseline to W48; comparison between arms
Virological failure predictive factors48 weeksDetermination of virological failure predictive factors
Impact of the strategy on the acceptability and quality of life48 weeksdetermination of quality of life with questionnary, comparison between arms
Proportion of patients with an adverse event48 weeks
Proportion of patients with a severe adverse event48 weeks
Creatinine clearance change48 weeksBiological parameters evolution in each arm
Clinical events48 weeksClinical events with progression to AIDS or death. Proportion of individuals developing a new CDC-event (as defined by cdc 1993 classification) from baseline to week 48.
RNA and DNA viral load (sub study)Week 24 to week 48RNA and DNA viral load in the genital tract (cervico-vaginal secretions or sperm): comparison between arms

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026